(218 days)
The Rusch TracFlex Plus Pediatric Tracheostomy Tube Set is used in airway management of tracheostomized patients.
The Rusch TracFlex Plus Pediatric Tracheostomy Tube Set is a sterile, single patient use tracheotomy tube, available in sizes 3-6mm in 1 mm increments, with accessories which may be included in a set or sold separately. The device is used to provide an artificial airway. The device is introduced into a tracheotomy incision in the patient's neck that provides access to the trachea. The TracFlex Plus Pediatric tracheostomy tube is made from Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) resin that is formulated without DEHP ("Non-DEHP" = < 0.1% DEHP w/w), and is stainless steel spiral armored. It is available cuffed and uncuffed. Accessories included in the set are a disposable inner cannula, obturator, shower cap, cough cap and sealing cap. The tracheostomy tube is secured using the flange that is connected to the neck strap.
The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the "Rusch TracFlex Plus Pediatric Tracheostomy Tube Set." This submission aims to demonstrate substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices, rather than establishing de novo acceptance criteria for a new type of device. Therefore, the document primarily focuses on comparison to established standards and the predicate device's performance, rather than defining novel performance targets for the AI.
However, based on the non-clinical comparative performance testing conducted to demonstrate substantial equivalence, we can infer some "acceptance criteria" through the lens of meeting established ISO standards or demonstrating comparable performance to the predicate device.
Here's an analysis structured around your request:
Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The "acceptance criteria" for this device are primarily met by adhering to relevant ISO standards and demonstrating performance comparable to the predicate devices. The study performed is a non-clinical comparative performance testing to establish substantial equivalence.
Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
| Test | Standard (if applicable) | Acceptance Criteria (Implied by standard/comparison) | Reported Device Performance (Implied from "meets intended use") |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connector bonding strength | ISO 5366-3 | The connector must remain securely attached under specified axial separation force. | Device met the requirements of ISO 5366-3 for connector bonding strength. |
| Flange (neck-plate) bonding strength | ISO 5366-3 | The neck-plate must remain securely attached under specified axial separation force. | Device met the requirements of ISO 5366-3 for flange bonding strength. |
| Cuff resting diameter | ISO 5366-3 | The cuff resting diameter must be within specified limits when inflated to a reference pressure. | Device met the requirements of ISO 5366-3 for cuff resting diameter. |
| Tube collapse | ISO 5366 | The airway lumen must remain patent with the cuff inflated (steel ball pass through). | The tube maintained patency as per ISO 5366. |
| Cuff herniation | ISO 5366 | The cuff must not herniate excessively beyond the bevel, which could occlude the orifice. | The device demonstrated acceptable cuff herniation as per ISO 5366. |
| Cuff Burst Evaluation | N/A | The cuff must not burst or rupture when inflated inside the trachea. | The cuff demonstrated adequate burst strength. |
| Cuff Bond Strength | N/A | The cuff must remain securely bonded to the tube. | The cuff demonstrated satisfactory bond strength. |
| Side arm bonding strength | N/A | The inflation line connection to the tracheostomy tube must have sufficient retention force. | The side arm demonstrated adequate bonding strength. |
| Ink adhesion test | N/A | Printing must remain legible after aging, sterilization, and wiping with solvent. | The ink adhesion was satisfactory, maintaining legibility. |
| Biocompatibility (Materials) | ISO 10993-1 | All patient-contacting materials must be biocompatible. | Materials complied with ISO 10993-1 (cytotoxicity, sensitization, etc.). |
Note: The document explicitly states "Performance test results demonstrate that the proposed device meets its intended use." This implies that all tested parameters met the specified criteria or acceptable ranges defined by the standards or internal protocols.
Detailed Study Information:
-
Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:
- The document does not specify the exact sample sizes (number of devices/components) used for each non-clinical test. It only lists the tests performed.
- Data Provenance: The data is generated from non-clinical laboratory testing of the new "Rusch TracFlex Plus Pediatric Tracheostomy Tube Set." The country of origin for the testing is not explicitly stated but implied to be under the purview of Teleflex Medical, Inc. (USA-based applicant). The testing is prospective in the sense that the new device was tested in a controlled laboratory environment.
-
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:
- This section is not applicable as this is a non-clinical device performance study, not an AI or diagnostic device study that requires human "ground truth" establishment by experts. The "ground truth" for these tests is defined by the objective pass/fail criteria of the ISO standards or internal test protocols.
-
Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
- Not applicable. This is a non-clinical study. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are used in clinical trials or diagnostic studies to resolve discrepancies among human readers/annotators in establishing ground truth, which is not relevant here.
-
If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- Not applicable. This document describes a traditional medical device (tracheostomy tube) and its non-clinical testing. It does not involve AI or human readers, therefore no MRMC study was conducted.
-
If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not an algorithm.
-
The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
- For this non-clinical performance study, the "ground truth" is defined by:
- Standardized Test Methods and Specifications: Primarily adherence to ISO 5366 and ISO 10993-1. These standards set objective, measurable criteria for device performance and safety.
- Engineering Specifications: Internal design and manufacturing specifications for parameters not covered by ISO standards (e.g., Cuff Burst, Cuff/Side Arm Bond Strength, Ink Adhesion).
- For this non-clinical performance study, the "ground truth" is defined by:
-
The sample size for the training set:
- Not applicable. This refers to a physical medical device, not an AI model requiring a training set.
-
How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not applicable. As above, there is no AI model or training set involved.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Name, Address, Phone and Fax Number of Applicant
MAY 2 3 2014
Teleflex Medical, Incorporated 2917 Weck Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 USA Phone: 919-433-4908 919-433-4996 Fax:
Contact Person
Lori Pfohl Regulatory Affairs Specialist
Device Name
Trade Name: Rusch TracFlex Plus Pediatric Tracheostomy Tube Set
Common Name: Tracheostomy Tube
Classification Name: Tube Tracheostomy and tube cuff (Class II per 21 CFR 868.5800, Product Code JOH)
Predicate Devices
K023918 - Rusch Crystal Clear Tracheostomy Sets, Cuffed and Cuffless K122235 - Rusch TracFlex Plus Tracheostomy Tube Set (Reference)
Device Description and Changes to Predicate
The Rusch TracFlex Plus Pediatric Tracheostomy Tube Set is a sterile, single patient use tracheotomy tube, available in sizes 3-6mm in 1 mm increments, with accessories which may be included in a set or sold separately. The device is used to provide an artificial airway. The device is introduced into a tracheotomy incision in the patient's neck that provides access to the trachea. The TracFlex Plus Pediatric tracheostomy tube is made from Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) resin that is formulated without DEHP ("Non-DEHP" = < 0.1% DEHP w/w), and is stainless steel spiral armored. It is available cuffed and uncuffed. Accessories included in the set are a disposable inner cannula, obturator, shower cap, cough cap and sealing cap. The tracheostomy tube is secured using the flange that is connected to the neck strap.
{1}------------------------------------------------
The Rusch TracFlex Plus Pediatric Tracheostomy Tube Set is used in airway management of tracheostomized patients
Patient Population: Pediatric Patients
Environment of use: Home, Hospital and Sub-acute Institutions
Contraindications
Insurmountable intubation obstruction
For patients during radiation therapy and magnetic resonance imaging
Substantial Equivalence Comparison to Predicates
| Features | Proposed TracFlex PlusPediatric | Predicate Crystal ClearK023918 | Predicate (for reference)TracFlex PlusK122235 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Device | Rusch TracFlex PlusPediatric TracheostomySet | Rusch Crystal ClearTracheostomy Sets, Cuffedand Cuffless | Rusch TracFlex PlusTracheostomy Tube Set |
| Indications for use | The Rusch TracFlex PlusPediatric TracheostomyTube Set is used in airwaymanagement oftracheostomized patients | The Rusch Crystal ClearTracheostomy Sets, Cuffedand Cuffless are intendedfor airway management oftracheostomized patients. | The Rusch TracFlex Plustracheostomy tube set isused in airwaymanagement oftracheostomized patients |
| Environment of Use | Home, Hospital and Sub-acute Institutions | Same | Same |
| Patient Population | Pediatric | Pediatric and adult | Adult |
| FDA Product Code | JOH 868.5800 | Same | Same |
| Contraindications | Insurmountable intubationobstructionFor patients duringradiation therapy andmagnetic resonanceimaging | None | Same |
| Sizes | 3-6 | 3.5 - 10.5 mm | 7 to 11 mm |
| Fenestrated | No | Yes and No | No |
| Cuff (if present) | Low Pressure | Same | Same |
| Available in sets | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Low pressure cuff | Spring return luer | same | Same |
The proposed device is substantially equivalent to the predicate device:
Teleflex Medical
{2}------------------------------------------------
| inflation system | operated valve | |
|---|---|---|
| Radiopaque | Yes | Yes |
| Stainless steel spiralreinforced tube | Yes | Yes |
| Method ofSterilization | Ethylene Oxide | Same |
| Packaging Material | Thermoformed tray withTyvek Lid | Same |
| Inner cannula | Disposable | same |
| Materials in patientcontact | PVC and Silicone | same |
| 15 mm connectorcompliant to ISO5356-1 | Yes | Same |
| Manufactured withDEHP (Non-DEHP) | No | Yes |
- Indications for Use The indications for use are identical for the proposed device when . compared to the predicate - K023918. Each device is indicated for use in airway management of tracheostomized patients.
- . Technology and construction - The design, fabrication, shape, size, etc. are equivalent to the predicate - K023918. This design includes the disposable inner cannula, obturator, shower cap, cough cap and sealing cap. They are available in sizes from 3.0 to 6.0mm OD.
- Environment of use The environments of use are identical to predicate K023918 .
- . Patient Population -The patient population is identical to the predicate - K023918
- Materials -All patient contacting materials are in compliance with ISO 10993-1. Testing ● included cytotoxicity, sensitization, intracutaneous activity, genotoxicity and implantation testing.
Comparison to Predicate Device:
The proposed TracFlex Plus Pediatric tracheostomy tubes are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices with respect to indications for use, technology and construction. The differences between the predicate and the proposed devices are minor and any risks have been mitigated through testing. The proposed device is designed with different materials than the main predicate, but essentially identical materials to the reference predicate. The proposed device is Non-DEHP.
Non-clinical Comparative Performance Testing
Teleflex Medical
{3}------------------------------------------------
A brief summary of tests relied upon to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate can be found in the table below:
| Test | Reference toStandard (ifapplicable) | Principle of Test |
|---|---|---|
| Connectorbonding strength | ISO 5366-3 | The security of the attachment of the connector to thetracheostomy tube is tested by applying an axial separationforce to the connector |
| Flange (neck-plate) bondingstrength | ISO 5366-3 | The security of the attachment of the neck-plate to thetracheostomy tube is tested by applying an axial separationforce to the neck-plate (flange) |
| Cuff restingdiameter | ISO 5366-3 | The resting diameter of the cuff is measured when the cuffis inflated to a reference pressure which is intended toremove creases but minimize stretching of its walls |
| Tube collapse | ISO 5366 | The patency of the tracheostomy tube airway lumen istested by passing a steel ball through the tracheostomytube lumen with the cuff inflated within a transparent tube |
| Cuff herniation | ISO 5366 | The tendency of the cuff to herniate beyond the planeperpendicular to the long axis of the tube at the nearestedge of the bevel is tested by applying an axial force withthe cuff inflated within a transparent tube. A cuff whichprotrudes excessively at its patient end may partially orcompletely occlude the orifice at the patient end |
| Cuff BurstEvaluation | N/A | The cuff restrained burst test is designed to ensure the cuffwill not burst or rupture when inflated inside the trachea |
| Cuff BondStrength | N/A | To evaluate the strength needed to separate the cuff fromthe tube |
| Side armbonding strength | N/A | To evaluate the retention force of the inflation lineconnection to the Tracheostomy tube |
| Ink adhesion test | N/A | To ensure the printing remains legible after the aging andsterilization processes and being wiped with a solvent |
Substantial Equivalence Conclusion
The Rusch TracFlex Plus Pediatric has the same indications for use, patient population and technology of construction as the predicate device. Performance test results demonstrate that the proposed device meets its intended use. It is for these reasons that the devices can be found substantially equivalent.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus, a symbol often associated with medicine and healthcare. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged around the caduceus in a circular fashion.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
May 23, 2014
Teleflex Medical, Incorporated Lori Pfohl Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist 2917 Week Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Re: K133173
Trade/Device Name: Rusch TracFlex Plus Pediatric Tracheostomy Tube Set Regulation Number: 21 CFR 868.5800 Regulation Name: Tracheostomy tube and tube cuff. Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: JOH Dated: April 24, 2014 Received: April 25, 2014
Dear Ms. Pfohl:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
: .
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Lori Pfohl
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportalProblem/default.hum for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Industry and Consumer Education at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industrv/default.htm.
:
:
Sincerely yours.
Teiashri P
Erin 1. Keith. M.S. Acting Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Respiratory, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
Indications for Use
Form Approved: OMB No. 0910-0120 Expiration Date: January 31, 2017 See PRA Statement below.
510(k) Number (if known) K133173
Device Name Rusch TracFlex Plus Pediatric Tracheostomy Tube Set
Indications for Use (Describe)
The Rusch TracFlex Plus Pediatric Tracheostomy Tube Set is used in airway management of tracheostomized patients.
Patient Population: Pediatric Patients per below:
| Pediatric Subgroup | Approximate Age Range |
|---|---|
| Neonate/Newborn | Birth to 28 days |
| Infant | 29 days to < 2 years |
| Child | 2 years to <12 years |
| Adolescent | 12 years to <18 years |
| Transitional Adolescent A | 18 years to <21 years |
Environment of use: Home, Hospital and Sub-acute Institutions
Type of Use (Select one or both, as applicable)
Prescription Use (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE ~ CONTINUE ON A SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED.
CHANGE FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR FOR MILL CONSTITUTION OF THE
Concurrence of Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) (Signature)
Image /page/6/Picture/16 description: The image shows the letters FDA in a stylized font. The letters are made up of small squares and rectangles, giving them a pixelated appearance. The letters are black and the background is white.
Anya C. Harry -S 2014.05.23 02:55:23 -04'00'
This section applies only to requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DO NOT SEND YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE PRA STAFF EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW.
The burden time for this collection of information is estimated to average 79 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and maintain the data needed and complete and review the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this information collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Office of Chief Information Officer Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Staff PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov
"An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB number."
§ 868.5800 Tracheostomy tube and tube cuff.
(a)
Identification. A tracheostomy tube and tube cuff is a device intended to be placed into a surgical opening of the trachea to facilitate ventilation to the lungs. The cuff may be a separate or integral part of the tracheostomy tube and is, when inflated, intended to establish a seal between the tracheal wall and the tracheostomy tube. The cuff is used to prevent the patient's aspiration of substances, such as blood or vomit, or to provide a means for positive-pressure ventilation of the patient. This device is made of either stainless steel or plastic.(b)
Classification. Class II.