The LOGIC Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is indicated for stand-alone intervertebral body fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one (1) or two (2) contiguous levels of the lumbosacral spine (L2-S1). DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have had at least six (6) months of non-operative treatment.

In addition, these patients may have had a previous non-fusion spinal surgery at the involved level(s) and may have had up to a Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s).

The LOGIC Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is to be used with autogenous bone graft material.

Device Description

The LOGIC system consists of a PEEK spacer with titanium bone screws for intervertebral body fusion. Screws are available in a variety of diameter-length combinations. Spacers are available in a variety of widths. depths, and heights. Fixation is achieved by inserting bone screws through the openings in the spacer into the vertebral bodies of the lumbar spine. The screws are intended to be used as integrated fixation for stand-alone use of the device.

AI/ML Overview

The provided regulatory document describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the "LOGIC Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device." This type of submission relies on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than requiring extensive clinical trials for efficacy and safety from scratch.

Therefore, the information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving device performance, as typically understood for AI/software-as-a-medical-device (SaMD) or novel device submissions, is not present in this document. Instead, the "performance data" refers to non-clinical bench testing to demonstrate mechanical equivalence.

Here's the breakdown of what can be extracted based on your request, explicitly stating what information is not available due to the nature of a 510(k) for this type of device:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance for the LOGIC Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device

The LOGIC Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device, a Class II medical device, demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate devices through non-clinical mechanical testing. The acceptance criteria for this type of device are primarily tied to meeting established ASTM standards for intervertebral body fusion devices, ensuring the device's mechanical integrity and performance under simulated physiological conditions.

Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Acceptance Criteria (Standard)	Reported Device Performance Statement
Static and dynamic axial compression (ASTM F2077-11)	"The results of this non-clinical testing show that the LOGIC device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices."
Static and dynamic compressive shear (ASTM F2077-11)	"The results of this non-clinical testing show that the LOGIC device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices."
Static Subsidence (ASTM F2267-04)	"The results of this non-clinical testing show that the LOGIC device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices."
Static Expulsion (ASTM Draft Standard F-04.25.02.02)	"The results of this non-clinical testing show that the LOGIC device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices."

Study Details:

Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Test Set Sample Size: Not applicable. The "test set" here refers to the physical devices subjected to mechanical bench testing, not a dataset of patient images or clinical outcomes. Specific numbers of devices tested per standard are not provided in this summary, but typically multiple samples are used for each test.
- Data Provenance: The data is generated from in vitro mechanical testing performed on the device itself.
- Retrospective or Prospective: Not applicable, as this is bench testing.
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. Ground truth for mechanical testing is based on objective measurements against engineering standards, not expert clinical interpretation.
Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable. Mechanical test results are quantitative and do not require expert adjudication in the same way clinical diagnoses do.
If a multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This device is a physical implant, not an AI or imaging diagnostic tool. Therefore, MRMC studies are not relevant.
If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This device is a physical implant, not an algorithm.
The type of ground truth used: For mechanical testing, the "ground truth" is defined by the objective measurements obtained from standardized tests (e.g., force applied, displacement, cycles to failure) and comparison to the performance of predicate devices or established minimum thresholds set by the ASTM standards.
The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This device does not involve a "training set" in the context of machine learning or AI.
How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

Summary of Substantial Equivalence:

The submission highlights that the LOGIC device is substantially equivalent to its predicates (Biomet Solitaire PEEK Anterior Spinal System, Binder Intervertebral Body Fusion Device, Synthes Synfix-LR system, Centinel Spine STALIF system) in terms of:

Intended use
Design
Materials (PEEK-OPTIMA®, tantalum markers, titanium alloy screws)
Processing
Operational principles

The non-clinical mechanical performance data further supports this claim of substantial equivalence.

Summary

{0}------------------------------------------------

EP 1 3 2013

Submitter's Name:	Binder Biomedical. Inc.
Submitter's Address:	1951 NW 7th Avenue, Suite 13135Miami, FL 33136
Submitter's Telephone:	561.981.2682
Contact Name:	Lawrence Binder
Date Summary was Prepared:	06 March 2013
Trade or Proprietary Name:	LOGIC Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device
Common or Usual Name:	Lumbar stand-alone intervertebral body fusion device
Classification:	Class II per 21 CFR §888.3080
Product Code:	OVD
Classification Panel:	Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Devices Panel
Predicate Devices:	Biomet Solitaire PEEK Anterior Spinal System (K081395 & K120557)Binder Intervertebral Body Fusion Device (K093015)Synthes Synfix-LR system (K072253)Centinel Spine STALIF system (K073109)

5.510(K) SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE

INDICATIONS FOR USE

In addition, these patients may have had a previous non-fusion spinal surgery at the involved level(s) and may have had up to a Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s).

The LOGIC Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is to be used with autogenous bone graft material.

{1}------------------------------------------------

TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS

The device is manufactured from PEEK-OPTIMA® (ASTM F2026, ISO 10993) with tantalum (ASTM F560-08) markers. Both materials have a successful history of use in the spinal implant industry and use of it in these devices does not introduce any previously unaccepted patient risks. The predicate devices are manufactured from PEEK-OPTIMA® and titanium alloy along with tantalum markers. All referenced predicates are also manufactured from PEEK-OPTIMA®.

The bone screws are manufactured from titanium alloy meeting requirements of ASTM F136-11, Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6 Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) Allov for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R56401). Titanium alloy has a successful history of use in the spinal implant industry and use of it in these devices does not introduce any previously unaccepted patient risks. The predicate bone screws are also manufactured from titanium alloy.

PERFORMANCE DATA

The LOGIC system has been tested in the following test modes:

. Static and dynamic axial compression per ASTM F2077-11
Static and dynamic compressive shear per ASTM F2077-11 �
· Static Subsidence per ASTM F2267-04
· Static Expulsion per ASTM Draft Standard F-04.25.02.02. "Static Push-out Test Method for Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices." Draft #2 - August 29, 2000

The results of this non-clinical testing show that the LOGIC device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.

SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE

The LOGIC device is substantially equivalent to its predicates for intervertebral body fusion in regards to intended use, design, materials, processing, and operational principles. Based upon the overall technology characteristics and mechanical performance data, it is has been established that the LOGIC Stand Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices currently on the market.

{2}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three lines representing its wings and body. The eagle is surrounded by text that reads "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" in a circular arrangement. The text is in all caps and appears to be in a sans-serif font.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Public Health Service

September 13, 2013

Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0012

Binder Biomedical. Incorporated Mr. Lawrence Binder President and CEO 1951 Northwest 7th Avenue, Suite 13135 Miami, Florida 33136

Re: K130641

Trade/Device Name: 1.OGIC Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3080 Regulation Name: Intervertebral body fusion device Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: OVD Dated: July 26, 2013 Received: August 12, 2013

Dear Mr. Binder:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice. labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA 's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set

{3}------------------------------------------------

Page 2 - Mr. Lawrence Binder

forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the clectronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address

http://www.fda.gov/McdicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803). please go to

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.

You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its internet address

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.

Sincerely yours,

Mark N. Melkerson -S

Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{4}------------------------------------------------

4. INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT

10 August 2017 - 10:00 AM Production 2017 - 10:00 PM 2017 - 10:00 PM 2017 - 10:00 PM IST 2017 - 10:00 PM P

510(k) Number if known: K130641

Device Name: LOGIC Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device

In addition, these patients may have had a previous non-fusion spinal surgery at the involved level(s) and may have had up to a Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s).

The LOGIC Stand-Alone Intervertebral Body Fusion Device is to be used with autogenous bone graft material.

Prescription Use _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Over-The-Counter Use AND/OR (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)

Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)

Anton E. Dmitriev, PhD Division of Orthopedic Devices

Regulation Number and Section

§ 888.3080 Intervertebral body fusion device.

(a)
Identification. An intervertebral body fusion device is an implanted single or multiple component spinal device made from a variety of materials, including titanium and polymers. The device is inserted into the intervertebral body space of the cervical or lumbosacral spine, and is intended for intervertebral body fusion.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls) for intervertebral body fusion devices that contain bone grafting material. The special control is the FDA guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intervertebral Body Fusion Device.” See § 888.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.(2) Class III (premarket approval) for intervertebral body fusion devices that include any therapeutic biologic (e.g., bone morphogenic protein). Intervertebral body fusion devices that contain any therapeutic biologic require premarket approval.
(c)
Date premarket approval application (PMA) or notice of product development protocol (PDP) is required. Devices described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall have an approved PMA or a declared completed PDP in effect before being placed in commercial distribution.