K Number
K130184
Device Name
ZENOLUX
Date Cleared
2013-05-24

(119 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
872.6660
Panel
Dental
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

Zenolux are milling blanks, which are intended to be used by professional dental technicians for the CAD/ CAM -fabrication of all-ceramic crowns and 3-unit bridges, in the anterior as well as posterior tooth region. These parts can be used as framework for veneering with suitable dental porcelain and/ or as full-contour monolithic restorations.

Device Description

Zenolux is a discoidal shaped, pre- sintered dental ceramic material that is composed of pure aluminium oxide (> 99,5%). It is a ready- to-use milling blank, which has to be processed in a milling machine with the CAD/CAM technology to achieve the desired shape. Thereafter, the milled unit has to be sintered at high temperatures (about 1350°C) to attain its nominal density and final chemical, physical and biological properties, which ensure its excellent effectiveness and safety, as well as its pleasant aesthetical translucency. Sintered Zenolux material is biocompatible, insoluble in water and have high flexural strength. To achieve a natural and individual tooth color, Zenolux restorations can be veneered with suitable dental porcelains or simply stained and glazed, for example with Allux (K050302), Zenolux meets all applicable requirements of the standard ISO 6872: 2008 "Dentistry - Ceramic materials", and exceeds the thresholds for a Type II, class 5 dental ceramic by far. Zenolux encompasses diverse models, which have a diameter of about 60 mm and thicknesses from 10 mm up to 25 mm.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text describes a dental ceramic material called Zenolux and its substantial equivalence to predicate devices, primarily based on bench testing against the ISO 6872:2008 standard. It does not contain information about an AI-powered medical device, clinical studies with human readers, or the establishment of ground truth by medical experts. Therefore, many of the requested categories cannot be populated from the provided text.

Here's an analysis based on the available information:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The device is evaluated against the ISO 6872:2008 "Dentistry - Ceramic materials" standard. The specific acceptance criteria within this standard are not fully detailed, but the text states the device "exceeds the thresholds for a Type II, class 5 dental ceramic by far."

Acceptance Criteria (from ISO 6872:2008)Reported Device Performance (Zenolux)
Thresholds for Type II, class 5 dental ceramicExceeds thresholds by far (for mechanical strength)
Water solubility limitsExtremely low water solubility
Biocompatibility requirementsHigh biocompatibility
Flexural strength (for Type II, class 5 ceramic, suitable for three-unit prostheses involving molar restoration)Even better compared to predicate devices; exceeds threshold by far.
Wear/abrasion characteristics (compared to conventional veneering porcelain)Similar to predicate materials and lower than conventional veneering porcelain
Fit of 3-unit bridgesExcellent and identical to other clinically approved CAD/CAM materials (e.g., zirconia)

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

  • Sample size: Not specified. The text mentions "Bench testing of the characteristics," but does not detail the number of samples tested for each characteristic.
  • Data provenance: Not explicitly stated but implied to be laboratory bench testing conducted by the manufacturer, Wieland Dental + Technik GmbH & Co. KG (Germany). This is retrospective, as the tests were performed to support a 510(k) submission.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

Not applicable. The ground truth for this device is based on objective measurements against an international standard (ISO 6872:2008) and comparisons with predicate devices, not expert consensus on medical images or clinical outcomes.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

Not applicable. This was bench testing against a standard, not a study requiring adjudication of expert opinions.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

No. This document describes a dental ceramic material, not an AI-powered medical device. Therefore, no MRMC study or AI assistance evaluation was performed.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

Not applicable. This device is a material, not an algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used

The ground truth is derived from:

  • Measurements against the ISO 6872:2008 "Dentistry - Ceramic materials" standard.
  • Direct comparison of technological characteristics (e.g., mechanical strength, wear resistance, fit) with legally marketed predicate devices.

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device; thus, there is no "training set."

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable. As there is no training set for an AI/machine learning model, this question is not relevant.

{0}------------------------------------------------

MAY 2 4 2013

5 510 (k) Summary

Submitter of 510(k): Wieland Dental + Technik GmbH & Co. KG Schwenninger Str. 13 D-75179 Pforzheim Germany Phone: +49-7231-3705-0

Contact person:Dr. Gerhard Polzer
Phone:+49-7231-3705-219
Fax:+49-7231-357959
e-mail:gerhard.polzer@wieland-dental.de

2013-01-19 Date of Summary:

Trade name:

Zenolux

Common name:Dental ceramic
Classification name:Powder, Porcelain
Product code:EIH
C.D.R section:872.6660
Classification:Class II

Legally marketed equivalent device: (510(k) number)

ZENO Al eco Disc (K082257) inCoris AL (K062506) Procera Bridge Alumina (K053050)

Cercon ht (K112152) Zenostar Zr Translucent (K112710)

Page

{1}------------------------------------------------

510 (k) Summary

Device description

Zenolux is a discoidal shaped, pre- sintered dental ceramic material that is composed of pure aluminium oxide (> 99,5%).

It is a ready- to-use milling blank, which has to be processed in a milling machine with the CAD/CAM technology to achieve the desired shape. Thereafter, the milled unit has to be sintered at high temperatures (about 1350°C) to attain its nominal density and final chemical, physical and biological properties, which ensure its excellent effectiveness and safety, as well as its pleasant aesthetical translucency. Sintered Zenolux material is biocompatible, insoluble in water and have high flexural strength.

To achieve a natural and individual tooth color, Zenolux restorations can be veneered with suitable dental porcelains or simply stained and glazed, for example with Allux (K050302),

Zenolux meets all applicable requirements of the standard ISO 6872: 2008 "Dentistry - Ceramic materials", and exceeds the thresholds for a Type II, class 5 dental ceramic by far.

Zenolux encompasses diverse models, which have a diameter of about 60 mm and thicknesses from 10 mm up to 25 mm.

Indications for use

Zenolux is intended to be used by professional dental technicians for the CAD/CAMfabrication of all-ceramic dental restorations for the sole use of a particular patient. It is recommended for manufacturing single crowns and three-unit bridges, which can be applied in the anterior as well as in the posterior tooth region. Zenolux units can be used as frameworks for veneering with suitable dental porcelain and/or as monolithic, full-contour restorations, as well.

Comparison with the predicate device

Page

Zenolux is substantially equivalent to the dental devices Zeno Al eco Disc (K082257), inCoris AL (K062506) and Procera Bridge Alumina (K053050). There is no difference in fundamental scientific technology between these predicates and Zenolux. Similarly, the technological characteristics of Zenolux are identical or even better than those of the predicates. All devices based on pure Aluminium oxide, have to be processed by CAD/CAM technology and to be densely sintered at high temperatures to attain its final properties. The main difference is the extended indication for use including posterior bridges and the use as full -contour crown or bridges.

V1

{2}------------------------------------------------

Bench testing of the characteristics according to ISO 6872:2008 indicate extremely low water solubility and high biocompatibility of the Zenolux material. Mechanical strength (flexural strength) of Zenolux is even better compared to the predicate devices, and exceeds the threshold of a class 5 ceramic, which is suitable for threeunit prostheses involving molar restoration, by far.

Regarding its application as full-contour restoration it is substantially equivalent to the dental devices Cercon ht (K112152) and Zenostar Zr Translucent (K112710) Wear tests showed that the abrasion of the Zenolux -material itself (not veneered) and of the antagonist teeth opposed to the material is similar to the predicate materials and lower compared to conventional veneering porcelain.

The fit of 3-unit Zenolux bridges is excellent and identical to that of other clinically approved CAD/CAM - materials, like zirconia.

Animal or clinical testing were not performed.

Conclusion

The chemical composition of Zenolux, its fundamental scientific technology and its technological characteristics are the same as in the predicate devices. The substantial equivalence of the indications for use has been proven by bench tests and professional evaluations. Therefore Zenolux is substantial equivalent in safety and effectiveness to the predicate device.

Page

{3}------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol that resembles an abstract representation of a person embracing or supporting another, formed by three curved lines.

Public Health Service

Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002

May 24, 2013

Gerhard Polzer, Ph.D. Director, Regulatory Affairs Wieland Dental + Technik GmbH & Co. KG Schwenninger Strasse 13 D-75179 Pforzheim GERMANY

Re: K130184

Trade/Device Name: Zenolux Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.6660 Regulation Name: Porcelain Powder for Clinical Use Regulatory Class: II Product Code: EIH Dated: March 22, 2013 Received: March 28, 2013

Dear Dr.Polzer:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

{4}------------------------------------------------

Page 2 - Dr. Polzer

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical devicerelated adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its tollfree number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21

CFR Part 803), please go to

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.

You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.

Sincerely vours.

Susan Runner, DDS, MA
03
Digitally signed by Mary S. Runner -S
DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=HHS,
ou=FDA, ou=People, cn=Mary S. Runner -S
0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=1300087950
Date: 2013.05.28 12:59:28 -04'00'

Anthony D. Watson, B.S., M.S., M.B.A. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital,

Respiratory. Infection Control and Dental Devices

Office of Device Evaluation

Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{5}------------------------------------------------

22.7 Indication for use statement

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known): K130184

Device Name: Zenolux

Indications for Use:

Zenolux are milling blanks, which are intended to be used by professional dental technicians for the CAD/ CAM -fabrication of all-ceramic crowns and 3-unit bridges, in the anterior as well as posterior tooth region. These parts can be used as framework for veneering with suitable dental porcelain and/ or as full-contour monolithic restorations.

Prescription Use × (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

Over-The-Counter Use AND/OR (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)

(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)

Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)

Digitally signed by Mary 5. Runner -S ーUS, 0=U.S. Government, ou=HHS,
DA, ou=People, cm=Mary S. Runner -S,
DA, ou=People, cm=Mary S. Runner -S,
B42,19200300.100.1.1=1300087950 ate: 2013.05.24 15:16:45 -04'00'

(Division Sign-Off) Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital Infection Control, Dental Devices

510(k) Number:

Page T of 1

§ 872.6660 Porcelain powder for clinical use.

(a)
Identification. Porcelain powder for clinical use is a device consisting of a mixture of kaolin, felspar, quartz, or other substances intended for use in the production of artificial teeth in fixed or removable dentures, of jacket crowns, facings, and veneers. The device is used in prosthetic dentistry by heating the powder mixture to a high temperature in an oven to produce a hard prosthesis with a glass-like finish.(b)
Classification. Class II.