The S-LOK™ PSS System is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudoarthrosis).

The S-LOK™ PSS System is also intended for non-cervical pedicle screw fixation for the following indications: severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra in skeletally mature patients receiving fusion by autogenous bone graft having implants attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (L3 to sacrum) with removal of the implants after the attainment of a solid fusion. It is also intended for the following indications: trauma (i.e. fracture or dislocation); spinal stenosis; curvatures (i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis); spinal tumor; pseudoarthrosis; and failed previous fusion.

Device Description

The S-LOK™ PSS System is a top-loading, multiple component, posterior spinal fixation system which consists of pedicle screws, rods, cross links, locking cap screws and hooks. All of the components are available in a variety of sizes to match more closely the patient's anatomy.

AI/ML Overview

Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the S-LOK™ PSS Pedicle Screw System's acceptance criteria and studies:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance

Acceptance Criteria Type	Acceptance Criteria	Reported Device Performance
Mechanical Testing	Static axial gripping (per ASTM F1798)	Equivalent to predicate device(s)
Static flexion/extension moment (per ASTM F1798)	Equivalent to predicate device(s)
Biomechanical Testing	Cadaver study	Equivalent to predicate device(s)

Study Details

Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):
- The document mentions a "cadaver study" but does not specify the sample size (number of cadavers or specific test subjects).
- The provenance of the data (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is not specified.
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience):
- This information is not provided in the document. The studies conducted are mechanical and biomechanical, not clinical studies involving expert interpretation for ground truth.
Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
- Not applicable. The studies are mechanical/biomechanical, not involving human adjudication of results.
If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. The device is a pedicle screw system, not an AI diagnostic tool.
If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:
- No, a standalone (algorithm-only) performance study was not done. The device is a physical medical implant, not an algorithm.
The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
- For the mechanical tests (Static axial gripping, Static flexion/extension moment), the ground truth is derived from the established ASTM F1798 standard and comparison to the predicate device's performance under similar testing conditions.
- For the cadaver study, the ground truth would be based on biomechanical measurements and observations of the system's performance within the cadaveric spine, again likely in comparison to the predicate device.
The sample size for the training set:
- Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not an AI/machine learning model that requires a training set.
How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device.

Summary

{0}------------------------------------------------

NOV 2 0 2012

Special 510(k) Summary for the S-LOK™ PSS Pedicle Screw System

In accordance with 21 CFR 807.92 of the Federal Code of Regulations the following Special 510(k) summary is submitted for the S-LOK™ PSS Pedicle Screw System

1. GENERAL INFORMATION

Date Prepared:	September 20, 2012
Trade Name:	S-LOKTM PSS System
Common Name:	pedicle screw system
Classification Name:	orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation

Class: II

Product Code:	MNIMNH
CFR section:	21 CFR section 888.3070
Device panel:	Orthopedic
Legally MarketedPredicate Device:	PSS System - K092128 / K090033 / K073240 / K071438Nu Vasive SpheRx PPS System - K090981
Submitter:	Spinal USA2050 Executive DrivePearl, MS 39208601-420-424
Contact:	J.D. Webb1001 Oakwood BlvdRound Rock, TX 78681512-388-0199

e-mail: jdwebb@orthomedix.net

2. DEVICE DESCRIPTION

Change from Predicate:

The purpose of this premarket notification is to make a modification to the surgical technique and add an instrument that is specific to that technique.

Materials:

Ti-6AI-4V ELI per ASTM F136 Commercially pure titanium per ASTM F67 CoCr per ASTM F1537 Stainless steel per ASTM F138

Pg. 1 of 2

{1}------------------------------------------------

3. SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE CLAIMED TO PREDICATE DEVICES

The S-LOK™ PSS System is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices in terms of intended use, design, materials used, mechanical safety and performances.

4. Intended use

NON-CLINICAL TEST SUMMARY 5.

The following tests were conducted:

. Static axial gripping per ASTM F1798
Static flexion/extension moment per ASTM F1798 .
Cadaver study .

The results of this testing indicate that the S-LOK™ is equivalent to predicate device(s).

6. CLINICAL TEST SUMMARY

No clinical studies were performed

7. CONCLUSIONS NONCLINICAL AND CLINICAL

Spinal USA considers the S-LOK™ PSS System to be equivalent to the predicate device listed above. This conclusion is based upon the devices' similarities in principles of operation, technology, materials and indications for use.

P
g. 2 of 2

{2}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The logo is circular, with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged around the perimeter. In the center of the circle is an abstract symbol that resembles an eagle or a stylized human figure.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Public Health Service

Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-002

Letter Dated: November 20, 2012

Spinal USA % Orthomedix Group, Inc Mr. J.D. Webb 1001 Oakwood Boulevard Round Rock, Texas 78681

Re: K122931

Trade/Device Name: S-LOK™ PSS System Regulation Number: 21 CFR §888.3070 Regulation Name: Pedicle screw spinal system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MNI, MNH Dated: September 21, 2012 Received: September 24, 2012

Dear Mr. Webb:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register,

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set

{3}------------------------------------------------

Page 2 - Mr. J.D. Webb

forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.

You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ResourcesforYou/Industry/default.htm.

Sincerely yours,

Mark N. Melkerson

Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{4}------------------------------------------------

INDICATIONS FOR USE

510(k) Number (if known): K12293)

Device Name: S-LOK™ PSS System

Indications for Use:

The S-LOK™ PSS System is intended to provide immobilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudoarthrosis).

Prescription Use X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

AND/OR

Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 807 Subpart C)

(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)

Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)

(Division Sign-Off) Diysion of Surgical, Orthopedic, and Restorative Devices

K122931 510(k) Number_

Regulation Number and Section

N/A