K Number
K122814
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2012-12-03

(81 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
888.3070
Reference & Predicate Devices
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

The Everest Spine Galleon Pedicle Screw System is intended for posterior, noncervical pedicle fixation for the following indications: severe spondylolisthesis (grade 3 or 4) of the L5-S1 vertebrae; trauma (i.e. fracture or dislocation), spinal stenosis, curvatures (i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis); tumor; pseudoarthrosis; and failed previous fusion. The device is to be used in skeletally mature patients, and for stabilization and immobilization of the spine as an adjunct to fusion with bone graft. The levels of fixation are T8 - S1.

Device Description

The Everest Spine Galleon Pedicle Screw System consists of longitudinal rods, polyaxial screws, and cross connectors. The Everest Spine Galleon Pedicle Screw System components are available in titanium alloy conforming to ASTM F-136 specifications.

AI/ML Overview

The provided document describes the Galleon Pedicle Screw System, a medical device. The acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets these criteria are outlined in section "7. Performance Testing".

Here's the breakdown of the requested information:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
Comparable function to predicate device"demonstrate comparable function"
Comparable performance characteristics to the predicate device"demonstrate comparable performance characteristics"
Performed in accordance with ASTM F1717"completed in accordance with ASTM F1717"
Withstand bending stress (implied)The longest pedicle screw (SE-112-CA-5.75 55mm) was tested to "provide greatest potential for bending stress".

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

  • Sample size: Not explicitly stated as a numerical value for number of screws. It mentions "Representative samples of the device".
  • Data provenance: The document does not specify the country of origin of the data or whether it was retrospective or prospective. The testing was conducted by or for Everest Spine LLC.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

This information is not provided in the document. The study described is a mechanical performance test, not a clinical study involving expert interpretation or ground truth establishment in a diagnostic sense.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

This information is not applicable as the study is a mechanical performance test, not a study requiring adjudication of expert opinions.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This information is not applicable as the study is a mechanical performance test, not an MRMC study related to AI assistance.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This information is not applicable as the study is a mechanical performance test, not an algorithm performance study.

7. The type of ground truth used

The concept of "ground truth" as typically applied in diagnostic studies (e.g., expert consensus, pathology) is not directly applicable to this mechanical performance test. The "ground truth" here is the physical behavior of the device under specific, standardized test conditions defined by ASTM F1717 and compared against the benchmark of the predicate device's performance under similar conditions.

8. The sample size for the training set

This information is not applicable as the study is a mechanical performance test and does not involve training a model or algorithm.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This information is not applicable as the study is a mechanical performance test and does not involve training a model or algorithm.

{0}------------------------------------------------

510(k) Summary

  1. Sponsor

Everest Spine LLC 8300 Greensboro Dr. Suite 800 McLean, VA 22102 USA

Primary Contact:Ravi Sharma PhD
Telephone:1- 703-918-4850

August 30, 2012 Date Prepared:

2. Galleon Pedicle Screw System:

Proprietary Name:Galleon Pedicle Screw System
Common/Usual Name:Pedicle Screw Spinal System
Classification Name:Pedicle Screw Spinal System(21 CFR 888.3070), Class II Product Codes MNH,MNI

3. Predicate Devices

K091110 Spinal Edge Titan Pedicle Screw System

4. Device Description

The Everest Spine Galleon Pedicle Screw System consists of longitudinal rods, polyaxial The Everest Spine Galleon Pedicle Screw System screws, and cross connectors. components are available in titanium alloy conforming to ASTM F-136 specifications.

5. Intended Use

The Everest Spine Galleon Pedicle Screw System is intended for posterior, noncervical pedicle fixation for the following indications: severe spondylolisthesis (grade 3 or 4) of the L5-S1 vertebrae; trauma (i.e. fracture or dislocation), spinal stenosis, curvatures (i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis); tumor; pseudoarthrosis; and failed previous fusion. The device is to be used in skeletally mature patients, and for stabilization and immobilization of the spine as an adjunct to fusion with bone graft. The levels of fixation are T8 - S1.

6. Technological Characteristics and Substantial Equivalent

The Everest Spine Galleon Pedicle Screw System and its predicate device(s) have the same indications for use, operating principles and are made of the same materials.

DEC 3 2012

{1}------------------------------------------------

Representative samples of the device.underwent testing to demonstrate comparable function and performance characteristics to the predicate device.

7. Performance Testing

The testing method for the Everest Spine Gulleon Pedicle Screw System was completed in accordance with ASTM F1717 "Standard Test Method for Spinal Implant Constructs in a Vertebrectomy Model''. Part number SE-112-CA-5.75 55mm length screw was used for testing. The longest pedicle screw was tested to provide greatest potential for bending stress. The performance testing and component descriptions in this submission demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices.

{2}------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three lines representing its wings, and the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" arranged in a circular fashion around the eagle. The text is in all caps and appears to be in a sans-serif font. The logo is black and white.

Public Health Service

Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Center - WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-002

December 3, 2012

Everest Spine, LLC % CHS Business Associates, LLC Ms. Christina Vacca 33650 Reserve Way Avon, Ohio 44011

Re: K122814

Trade/Device Name: Galleon Pedicle Screw System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3070 Regulation Name: Pedicle screw spinal system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MNI, MNH Dated: November 2, 2012 Received: November 9, 2012

Dear Ms. Vacca:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you; however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set

{3}------------------------------------------------

Page 2 – Ms. Christina Vacca

forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803). please go to

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.

You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.

Sincerely vours.

Erin I. Keith

Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of Orthopedic Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{4}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use Statement

510(k) Number (if Known): K122814

Device Name: Galleon Pedicle Screw System

Indications for Use:

The Everest Spine Galleon Pedicle Screw System is intended for posterior, noncervical pedicle fixation for the following indications: severe spondylolisthesis (grade 3 or 4) of the L5-S1 vertebrae; trauma (i.e. fracture or dislocation), spinal stenosis, curvatures (i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis); tumor, pseudoarthrosis; and failed previous fusion. The device is to be used in skeletally mature patients, and for stabilization and immobilization of the spine as an adjunct to fusion with bone graft. The levels of fixation are T8 - S1.

Prescription Use: _____X (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) AND/OR

Over-The-Counter Use:_ (Part 21 CFR 807 Subpart C)

(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)

Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)

Ronald P. Jean

(Division Sign-Off) · Division of Orthopedic Devices 510(k) Number: K122814

§ 888.3070 Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system.

(a)
Identification. (1) Rigid pedicle screw systems are comprised of multiple components, made from a variety of materials that allow the surgeon to build an implant system to fit the patient's anatomical and physiological requirements. Such a spinal implant assembly consists of a combination of screws, longitudinal members (e.g., plates, rods including dual diameter rods, plate/rod combinations), transverse or cross connectors, and interconnection mechanisms (e.g., rod-to-rod connectors, offset connectors).(2) Semi-rigid systems are defined as systems that contain one or more of the following features (including but not limited to): Non-uniform longitudinal elements, or features that allow more motion or flexibility compared to rigid systems.
(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls), when intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra; degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment; fracture; dislocation; scoliosis; kyphosis; spinal tumor; and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). These pedicle screw spinal systems must comply with the following special controls:(i) Compliance with material standards;
(ii) Compliance with mechanical testing standards;
(iii) Compliance with biocompatibility standards; and
(iv) Labeling that contains these two statements in addition to other appropriate labeling information:
“Warning: The safety and effectiveness of pedicle screw spinal systems have been established only for spinal conditions with significant mechanical instability or deformity requiring fusion with instrumentation. These conditions are significant mechanical instability or deformity of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine secondary to severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra, degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). The safety and effectiveness of these devices for any other conditions are unknown.”
“Precaution: The implantation of pedicle screw spinal systems should be performed only by experienced spinal surgeons with specific training in the use of this pedicle screw spinal system because this is a technically demanding procedure presenting a risk of serious injury to the patient.”
(2) Class II (special controls), when a rigid pedicle screw system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis other than either severe spondylolisthesis (grades 3 and 4) at L5-S1 or degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment. These pedicle screw systems must comply with the following special controls:
(i) The design characteristics of the device, including engineering schematics, must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use.
(ii) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate the mechanical function and durability of the implant.
(iii) Device components must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(iv) Validation testing must demonstrate the cleanliness and sterility of, or the ability to clean and sterilize, the device components and device-specific instruments.
(v) Labeling must include the following:
(A) A clear description of the technological features of the device including identification of device materials and the principles of device operation;
(B) Intended use and indications for use, including levels of fixation;
(C) Identification of magnetic resonance (MR) compatibility status;
(D) Cleaning and sterilization instructions for devices and instruments that are provided non-sterile to the end user; and
(E) Detailed instructions of each surgical step, including device removal.
(3) Class II (special controls), when a semi-rigid system is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine as an adjunct to fusion for any indication. In addition to complying with the special controls in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) of this section, these pedicle screw systems must comply with the following special controls:
(i) Demonstration that clinical performance characteristics of the device support the intended use of the product, including assessment of fusion compared to a clinically acceptable fusion rate.
(ii) Semi-rigid systems marketed prior to the effective date of this reclassification must submit an amendment to their previously cleared premarket notification (510(k)) demonstrating compliance with the special controls in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (v) and paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section.