(127 days)
This glove is disposable and intended for medical purpose that is worn on the examiner's hand to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.
Powdered Latex Examination Gloves. non-sterile.
The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for "Powdered Latex Examination Gloves" by THAI HUA HOLDING CO. LTD. It outlines the device's characteristics, intended use, and conformance to standards.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets those criteria, based on the provided document:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| CHARACTERISTICS | STANDARDS | DEVICE PERFORMANCE |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ASTM D 3578-05 | Meets |
| Physical Properties | ASTM D 3578-05 | Meets |
| Freedom from Holes | ASTM D 3578-05ASTM D 5151-06 | MeetsAQL 1.5 |
| Residual Powder | ASTM 6124-06 | Less than 10 mg per dm² |
| Protein Content | ASTM D 5712-99 | Less than 200 µg per dm² |
| Biocompatibility (Irritation) | Primary Skin Irritation in RabbitsCPSC Title 16, Chapter II, Part 1500:41 | Passes |
| Biocompatibility (Sensitization) | Guinea Pig SensitizationsISO 10993-10: 2002(E) | Passes |
The "DEVICE PERFORMANCE" column indicates that the gloves meet or pass the specified criteria, demonstrating compliance with the referenced ASTM, CPSC, and ISO standards.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document does not specify the sample size used for the test set (e.g., how many gloves were tested for dimensions, holes, etc.).
It also does not specify the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective). The testing appears to be conducted by the manufacturer to demonstrate compliance with international standards.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
This information is not applicable and therefore not provided in the document. The "ground truth" for this type of device (examination gloves) is established by adherence to predefined objective physical and chemical standards (e.g., ASTM, ISO), not by expert opinion or interpretation in a medical imaging or diagnostic context.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This information is not applicable and therefore not provided in the document. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are typically used in studies involving subjective interpretation (e.g., medical image reading) where disagreements between experts need to be resolved. For objective physical and chemical tests, the results are quantifiable and do not require adjudication.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done
No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is relevant for diagnostic devices where human readers interpret results, and the impact of an AI algorithm on their performance is being evaluated. For medical gloves, the performance is assessed against objective technical standards, not through human reader interpretation.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
This information is not applicable. The device is a physical product (examination gloves), not an algorithm or AI system. Therefore, the concept of "standalone algorithm performance" does not apply.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for this device is based on objective, verifiable physical and chemical standards as defined by:
- ASTM D 3578-05: Standard Specification for Rubber Examination Gloves (for dimensions, physical properties, freedom from holes).
- ASTM D 5151-06: Standard Test Method for Detection of Holes in Medical Gloves.
- ASTM 6124-06: Standard Test Method for Residual Powder on Medical Gloves.
- ASTM D 5712-99: Standard Test Method for the Measurement of Latex Allergens in Natural Rubber and Latex Products.
- CPSC Title 16, Chapter II, Part 1500:41: For Primary Skin Irritation in Rabbits.
- ISO 10993-10: 2002(E): Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 10: Tests for irritation and skin sensitization (specifically for Guinea Pig Sensitizations).
These standards provide the definitive criteria against which the device's performance is measured.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This information is not applicable. The device is a physical product, not an AI/ML model that requires a training set. The manufacturing process of gloves does not involve machine learning training sets.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
This information is not applicable as there is no training set for this type of physical device.
{0}------------------------------------------------
THAI HUA HOLDING CO. LTD
510(k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS As required by §807.92(c) 510(k) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS Powdered Latex Examination Gloves
FEB - 3 2011
| 1. | Applicant | THAI HUA HOLDING CO., LTD.238/1 Ratchadapisek 18, HuaykwangBangkok 10320 ThailandTel: 66-02-274 0471-7Fax: 66-02-274 0231 |
|---|---|---|
| 2. | Contact Person | Mr. Reyong KittipolManaging DirectorTel: 66-02-2740 471-7Fax: 66-02-2740 231OrKok-Kee HonTechnical Advisor & Official Correspondent6324 Meetinghouse WayAlexandria, VA 22312 USATel: 703-941-7656Fax: 703-941-2551 |
| 3. | Device Name: | Patient Examination Gloves |
- Powdered Latex Examination Gloves. (CFR 880.6250) Common Name: 4.
-
- Classification: Class 1
- The Powdered Latex Examination Gloves is substantially equivalent to legally market Predicate Device: 6. K891300 Latex Patient Examination Gloves, class I (21CFR 880.6250), product code LYY that meet all the requirements of ASTM D 3578-05 Standard Specification for Rubber Examination Gloves.
- Device Description; Powdered Latex Examination Gloves. non-sterile. 7.
Intended Use of the Device: 8.
This glove is disposable and intended for medical purpose that is worn on the examiner's hand to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.
Technological Characteristics of Device: 9.
I comboogied. Characteristics or Gloves characteristics are summarized below as compared to ASTM standard requirements and to predicate devices:
| CHARACTERICS | STANDARDS | DEVICE PERFORMANCE |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ASTM D 3578-05 | Meets |
| Physical Properties | ASTM D 3578-05 | Meets |
| Freedom from Holes | ASTM D 3578-05ASTM D 5151-06 | MeetsAQL 1.5 |
| Residual Powder | ASTM 6124-06 | Less than 10 mg per dm² |
| Protein Content | ASTM D 5712-99 | Less that 200 µg per dm² |
| Biocompatibility | Primary Skin Irritation in RabbitsCPSC Title 16, Chapter II, Part 1500:41 | Passes |
| Biocompatibility | Guinea Pig SensitizationsISO 10993-10: 2002(E) | Passes |
Are summarized above 10. Performance Data:
- Not required Clinical Data: 11.
-
- Conclusion:
The Powdered Latex Examination Gloves base on the nonclinical tests The Fordered Later as effective and performs at least as safely and effectively as the legally market predicate device identified or legally marketed Latex Patient Examination Gloves, Class I (21CFR 880.6250), product code LYY. December 4th, 2010
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three lines representing its wings, and the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" arranged in a circular fashion around the eagle. The logo is in black and white.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Mr. Kok-Kee Hon Official Correspondent Thai Hua Holding Company, Limited 6324 Meetinghouse Way Alexandria, Virginia 22312-1718
FEB - 3 201
Re: K102838
Trade/Device Name: Powdered Latex Examination Gloves Regulation Number: 21 CFR 880.6250 Regulation Name: Patient Examination Gloves Regulatory Class: I Product Code: LYY Dated: January 24, 2011 Received: January 26, 2011
Dear Mr. Hon:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration. Please note: CDRH does not evaluate information related to contract liability warranties. We remind you, however, that device labeling must be truthful and not misleading.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Page 2- Mr. Hon
Enclosure
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices /ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Anthony D. Watson, B.S., M.S., M.B.A. Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Canter for Devices and Radiological Health
{3}------------------------------------------------
INDICATION FOR USE
| Applicant: | THAI HUA HOLDING CO., LTD |
|---|---|
| 510 (K) Number: | |
| Device Name: | Powdered Latex Examination Gloves. |
Indications for Use:
This glove is disposable and intended for medical purpose that is worn on the examiner's hand to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.
Prescription Use______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (Part 21CFR 801.109) (PLEASE DO NOT INRITE BELOW THIS LINE)
X AND/OR Over the-Counter Use
(21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Elizabeth F. Clamie-Will
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital Infection Control, Dental Devices
510(k) Number: K102838
§ 880.6250 Non-powdered patient examination glove.
(a)
Identification. A non-powdered patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. A non-powdered patient examination glove does not incorporate powder for purposes other than manufacturing. The final finished glove includes only residual powder from manufacturing.(b)
Classification. Class I (general controls). The device, when it is a finger cot, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 880.9.