K Number
K083669

Validate with FDA (Live)

Device Name
OBI
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2009-06-08

(179 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
872.3640
Panel
Dental
Reference & Predicate Devices
N/A
Predicate For
N/A
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

Surgical placement in mandibular arch to support overdentures in edentulous patients.

Device Description

A set of root form endosseous dental implants and components for surgical placement in maxillary and/or mandibular arch to support crowns, bridges, overdentures in endentulous or partially edentulous patients.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets them. The document is a 510(k) summary and FDA clearance letter for the OBI dental implant, which establishes substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on laboratory testing for functionality and design conformance.

Therefore, I am unable to provide the requested information, including:

  1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: Not present.
  2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not present. The text only mentions "Laboratory testing" without details on sample size or data origin.
  3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable as no clinical study with ground truth establishment is described.
  4. Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable.
  5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. The device is a dental implant, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool.
  6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only, without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable.
  7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): Not applicable. The testing was described as "Laboratory testing... to determine device functionality and conformance to design requirements."
  8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable.
  9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

{0}------------------------------------------------

KDB3669

510(k) Summary

JUN - 8 2009

Name/Address of Submitter:Euroteknika
656 rue du Général de Gaulle
74700, Salanches, France
  • Emmanuel Montini 2. Contact Person: Consultant, BCF Certification inc. Phone: (514) 397-6705 Fax: (514) 397-8515

  • Date Summary Prepared: November 14, 2008 3.

    1. Devices Name: Obi
    1. Predicate Devices:
  • Devices Description: A set of root form endosseous dental implants and 6. components for surgical placement in maxillary and/or mandibular arch to support crowns, bridges, overdentures in endentulous or partially edentulous patients.

  • Intended Use: The device is intended for surgical placement in mandibular arch 7. to support overdentures in edentulous patients.

  • Brief Description of Clinical and Non-clinical Testings: Laboratory testing was 8. conducted to determine device functionality and conformance to design requirements.

  • Conclusion Drawn: Substantially equivalent to the cited predicate devices. 9.

{1}------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

Image /page/1/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle-like symbol with three parallel lines forming the body and wings. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES. USA" is arranged in a circular fashion around the symbol.

Public Health Service

Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850

JUN - 8 2009

Euroteknika C/O Mr. Emanuel Montini Senior Consultant BCF Certification Incorporated 1100 Rene-Levesque-Boulevard West-25ta Floor Montreal, Quebec .... CANADA H3B 5C9

Re: K083669

Trade/Device Name: OBI Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3640 Regulation Name: Endosseous Dental Implant Regulatory Class: II Product Code: DZE, NHA Dated: May 25, 2009 Received: May 27, 2009

Dear Mr. Montini:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition. FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

{2}------------------------------------------------

Page 2 - Mr. Montini

Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/comp/ for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to http://www.fdargov/cdrb/mdr/for the CDRH-s-Office of Surveillance-and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.

You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.

Sincerely yours,

Susan Rinner

Susan Runner, D.D.S., MA Acting Division Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{3}------------------------------------------------

K083669

Indication for Use

Device Name: OBI

Indication for Use: Surgical placement in mandibular arch to support overdentures in edentulous patients.

Concurrence of CDRH Office of Device Evaluation

Prescription Use X = (per 21CFR 801.109)

Over-the-counter Use _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Susan Runne
(Division Sign-Off)

OR

Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital Infection Control, Dental Devices

510(k) Number: K053609

§ 872.3640 Endosseous dental implant.

(a)
Identification. An endosseous dental implant is a prescription device made of a material such as titanium or titanium alloy that is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore a patient's chewing function.(b)
Classification. (1) Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a root-form endosseous dental implant. The root-form endosseous dental implant is characterized by four geometrically distinct types: Basket, screw, solid cylinder, and hollow cylinder. The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-Form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments” will serve as the special control. (See § 872.1(e) for the availability of this guidance document.)(2)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II if it is a blade-form endosseous dental implant. The special controls for this device are:(i) The design characteristics of the device must ensure that the geometry and material composition are consistent with the intended use;
(ii) Mechanical performance (fatigue) testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate maximum load (endurance limit) when the device is subjected to compressive and shear loads;
(iii) Corrosion testing under simulated physiological conditions to demonstrate corrosion potential of each metal or alloy, couple potential for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system, and corrosion rate for an assembled dissimilar metal implant system;
(iv) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible;
(v) Sterility testing must demonstrate the sterility of the device;
(vi) Performance testing to evaluate the compatibility of the device in a magnetic resonance (MR) environment;
(vii) Labeling must include a clear description of the technological features, how the device should be used in patients, detailed surgical protocol and restoration procedures, relevant precautions and warnings based on the clinical use of the device, and qualifications and training requirements for device users including technicians and clinicians;
(viii) Patient labeling must contain a description of how the device works, how the device is placed, how the patient needs to care for the implant, possible adverse events and how to report any complications; and
(ix) Documented clinical experience must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.