(51 days)
A surgical glove is a disposable device made from Natural or Synthetic rubber intended to be worn by operating room personnel to protect the surgical wound from contamination.
Not Found
This appears to be a 510(k) clearance letter for Powder Free Polychloroprene Sterile Surgical Gloves. These letters typically document the FDA's decision regarding substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than providing detailed acceptance criteria or a study proving device performance in the way a clinical trial for a novel AI/software medical device might.
Regarding the specific questions you asked:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document provided does not contain a table of acceptance criteria or reported device performance for an AI/software device. This letter is for a physical medical device (surgical gloves). For surgical gloves, performance is typically assessed against recognized consensus standards (e.g., ASTM standards for barrier integrity, physical properties). The letter itself does not detail these standards or test results.
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
This information is not available in the provided document. The 510(k) letter confirms clearance based on substantial equivalence, but it doesn't detail the testing performed on the device or the characteristics of the data used for any such testing.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
This information is not applicable and not available in the provided document. Surgical gloves do not typically involve expert ground truth establishment in the way an AI diagnostic tool would.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
This information is not applicable and not available in the provided document for the reasons stated above.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
This information is not applicable and not available in the provided document, as it is not an AI/software device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
This information is not applicable and not available in the provided document, as it is not an AI/software device.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
This information is not applicable and not available in the provided document for the reasons stated above.
8. The sample size for the training set
This information is not applicable and not available in the provided document, as it is not an AI/software device.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
This information is not applicable and not available in the provided document for the reasons stated above.
Summary based on the provided document:
The document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for "Powder Free Polychloroprene Sterile Surgical Gloves" (K030228). It states that the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices. The letter itself does not include specific acceptance criteria or detailed study results for performance relative to those criteria. For surgical gloves, performance is generally demonstrated through adherence to recognized consensus standards (e.g., for barrier integrity, biocompatibility, dimensions, physical properties), which would be part of the 510(k) submission but are not detailed in the clearance letter itself.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The seal features a stylized eagle with three wing segments, representing health, human services, and prevention. The eagle is encircled by the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" in a circular arrangement.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
MAR 1 4 2003
Mr. Anil Taneja Vice President PT. MediSafeTechnologies JL. Kapt. Pattimura No. 3, Medan, North Sumatra, INDONESIA
Re: K030228
Trade/Device Name: Powder Free Polychloroprene Sterile Surgical Gloves Regulation Number: 878.4460 Regulation Name: Surgeon's Gloves Regulatory Class: I Product Code: KGO Dated: February 14, 2003 Received: February 21, 2003
Dear Mr. Taneja:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Taneja
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807): labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions 531-542 of the Act): 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits vour device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4618. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely vours.
Susan Rummer
Susan Runner, DDS, MA Interim Director Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital, Infection Control and Dental Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for MediSafe Technologies. The logo consists of a stylized letter "M" formed by three angled lines, with the company name "MediSafe" printed below it in a bold font. Underneath "MediSafe" is the word "TECHNOLOGIES" in a smaller, less bold font. The logo is black and white.
PT. MediSafe TECHNOLOGIES
3.0
INDICATION FOR USE Applicant: 510(k) Number (if known): * __ Not known __ K 630228 Device Name:
Indications For Use: A surgical glove is a disposable device made from Natural or Synthetic rubber intended to be worn by operating room personnel to protect the surgical wound from contamination.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED) Concurrence of CDHR Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use Or Over-The-Counter _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Per 21 CFR 801.109 (optional Format 1-2-96)
- For a new submission, do NOT fill in the 510(k) number blank.
contd/-....
Chisa S. Lin
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Anesthesiology, General Hospital. Infection Control, Dental De
510(k) Number. K03022
$\sigma/$
§ 878.4460 Non-powdered surgeon's glove.
(a)
Identification. A non-powdered surgeon's glove is a device intended to be worn on the hands of operating room personnel to protect a surgical wound from contamination. A non-powdered surgeon's glove does not incorporate powder for purposes other than manufacturing. The final finished glove includes only residual powder from manufacturing.(b)
Classification. Class I (general controls).