Search Results

Profoject™ Insulin Syringes (Model A):
The Profoject™ Insulin Syringes are intended for subcutaneous injection of U-40 and U-100 insulin in the treatment of diabetes.

Profoject™ Insulin Syringes (Model B):
The Profoject™ Insulin Syringes are intended for subcutaneous injection of U-40 and U-100 insulin in the treatment of diabetes.

Profoject™ Safelock Disposable Insulin Syringe:
The device is intended for the delivery of U-40 or U-100 insulin. The needle stick prevention feature of the device, once activated, guards against accidental needle-sticks.

Profoject™ Insulin Syringes: Profoject™ Insulin Syringes are categorized into Model A and Model B, the difference is that Model A utilizes an integrated hub and barrel design, and Model B has a separate hub and barrel. The proposed device are 0.3mL, 0.5mL, and 1mL syringes designed for subcutaneous injection of a desired dose of insulin, consisting of needle cap, needle tube, plunger stopper, plunger, barrel and hub (only Model B). Profoject™ Insulin Syringes are sterile, single-use, non-toxic and work on the principle of a piston syringe.

Profoject™ Safelock Disposable Insulin Syringe: The Profoject™ Safelock Disposable Insulin Syringe are 0.3mL, 0.5mL, and 1mL syringes designed for subcutaneous injection of a desired dose of insulin, consisting of needle cap, needle tube, plunger stopper, plunger, barrel, collar and protective shield. The Profoject™ Safelock Disposable Insulin Syringe is a sterile, single-use, non-toxic and work on the principle of a piston syringe.

N/A

Ask a specific question about this device

The Instylla Delivery Kit is intended to be used for the intra-arterial or intra-venous administration of radiographic contrast media, saline, and other aqueous solutions.

The Instylla Delivery Kit is comprised of two delivery syringes, a syringe holder, and a plunger clip (link). The barrel contains a fixed male luer connector, which is compatible with female luer hubs.

The Instylla Delivery Kit is a sterile, single patient use device intended to be used for the intra-arterial or intra-venous administration of radiographic contrast media, saline and other aqueous solutions. The device consists of a double-barreled syringe holder which holds and couples two (2) 1mL commercially available needleless syringes with calibrated hollow barrels and movable plungers. A single plunger clip is attached to both syringe plungers to facilitate the simultaneous injection of two distinct fluids when depressed.

The syringes of the Instylla Delivery Kit are composed of polycarbonate. The plunger clip and holder are composed of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS).

N/A

Ask a specific question about this device

Smart Caps are indicated for use as sterile tip caps with tamper-evident function for luer-lock syringes. The use time of the Smart cap should be ≤ 24 hours.

The Smart Cap is a tamper-evident syringe cap with a clear indication of cap removal to ensure sterility and reduce the risk of medical fluids being compromised accidentally or intentionally. Its assembly includes an outer cover, an inner cap and an inner ring. It is made of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polypropylene (PP) and is sterilized by ethylene oxide.

N/A

Ask a specific question about this device

Verisafe Safety Ret retractable Insulin Syringes are intended for aspiration and subcutaneous injection of insulin. After injection, the needle can be retracted directly from the patient's skin into the syringe barrel to avoid exposure to a contaminated needle, thereby minimizing accidental needle stick injuries.

Safety Retractable Insulin Syringes is a sterile device consisting of a calibrated barrel, plunger, piston, push button, retraction cylinder, sealing ring, spring and a needle. It is made of plastic, stainless steel and silicone materials. Type 5 is a syringe with a fixed needle.

The needle cap color is used to indicate insulin concentration that red for U40 and orange for U100.

Safety Retractable Insulin Syringes is using plunger to fill syringe as well as discharge the fluid. After use, by continuing to press the push-button down to depress the plunger all of the way within the barrel, the safety mechanism will be triggered, then the needle tube, needle hub and retraction cylinder will be retracted into the barrel completely under the force of the spring to minimize the risk of accidental sharps injury.

Product is delivered sterile. Sterilization process is validated according to EN ISO 11135.

This is a single-use device. Safety Sterile Syringes is intended to be used in Professional Healthcare Facility,
Home Environment and Transport (Ambulatory) Environment.

N/A

Ask a specific question about this device

The Merit Syringe is used to inject fluids into, and withdraw fluids from, the body.

The Merit Syringe a standard three-piece piston syringe intended for general purpose injection and aspiration by a qualified clinician. The syringe is constructed of a calibrated, hollow, clear polycarbonate barrel into which is inserted a closely fitted movable ABS plunger with black silicone rubber piston seal (tip). The barrel is marked with standard graduations per ISO 7886-1 requirements and contains an ISO 80369-7 compliant fixed male luer, small-bore connector. The subject device is single use and is available in either an ethylene oxide (EO) or gamma-sterile configuration.

N/A

Ask a specific question about this device

Sure-Fine Insulin Syringes are hypodermic insulin syringes for subcutaneous injection of U100 insulin.

Sure-Fine Insulin syringes are designed for the subcutaneous injection of a desired dose of insulin. The syringe has a graduated barrel(U-100), a plunger rod, needle cap, protective end cap and needle permanently affixed to the tip of the syringe with epoxy.

The syringes are available in the following size and cap color.

N/A

Ask a specific question about this device

Monoject Syringes with Luer tip are intended for single use by health care professionals for general purpose fluid aspiration and and/or injection.

Not Found

The provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter pertains to Monoject™ Syringes, which are physical medical devices (piston syringes) and not an AI/ML software device. Therefore, the concepts of acceptance criteria for algorithm performance, study methodology for AI models, sample sizes for training/test sets, ground truth establishment, expert adjudication, or MRMC studies are not applicable to this document.

The letter indicates that the device has received substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices, meaning it meets the safety and effectiveness requirements for its intended use, which is general purpose fluid aspiration and/or injection by healthcare professionals.

To answer your request, if this were an AI/ML device, the information would typically be found in the 510(k) submission summary or a separate clinical study report, neither of which is present in the provided FDA clearance letter. The letter itself is a notice of clearance, not a detailed technical report of the studies performed.

Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from the provided document as it does not contain details about an AI/ML study or its performance criteria.

Ask a specific question about this device

The BD Plastipak™ Syringe is intended for use by health care professionals for general purpose fluid aspiration/injection.

The BD Plastipak™ Syringe is a three-piece, single use, sterile, hypodermic syringe with a 6% (Luer) male connector in 20 mL and 50 mL eccentric luer slip tip configurations. The BD Plastipak™ Syringe is intended for use by health care professionals for general purpose fluid aspiration/injection. The syringe assembly consists of a lubricated polypropylene barrel with a graduated scale, a lubricated synthetic rubber stopper and a polypropylene plunger rod. The plunger rod is pulled back to aspirate fluids or depressed to inject or expel fluids. The syringe barrel incorporates a male 6% (Luer) connector which is connectable to a compatible female 6% (Luer) connector. The BD Plastipak™ Syringe is provided sterile by Ethylene Oxide Gas (ETO) sterilization method.

The provided text is a 510(k) Clearance Letter for a medical device (BD Plastipak™ Syringe). It details the device's characteristics, intended use, and comparison to a predicate device. However, it does not describe an AI/ML-driven medical device or a study involving human readers or expert consensus for ground truth establishment.

The document discusses bench performance testing and biocompatibility tests for a physical device (syringe), not a software or AI-based diagnostic tool. Therefore, many of the requested criteria (like sample size for test/training set, number of experts, adjudication method, MRMC study, standalone performance, ground truth types) are not applicable to this specific submission.

Despite the irrelevance of some questions to the provided document, I will structure the answer based on the questions asked, indicating "Not Applicable" or providing the information that is present in the document.

Here's an analysis of the provided 510(k) clearance letter in the context of the requested information about acceptance criteria and study data:

This 510(k) clearance letter pertains to a physical medical device, the BD Plastipak™ Syringe, not an AI/ML-driven diagnostic or image analysis tool. As such, many of the typical acceptance criteria and study methodologies applicable to AI models (e.g., ground truth established by experts, MRMC studies, training/test set sizes for algorithms, human reader improvement with AI assistance) are not relevant or described in this document.

The "study" referenced in the document primarily consists of non-clinical performance and biocompatibility testing to demonstrate the substantial equivalence of the new syringe (with a changed barrel resin) to a previously cleared predicate syringe.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document states, "The subject device met all the predetermined acceptance criteria for the above listed performance and biocompatibility tests." However, it does not explicitly list the quantitative acceptance criteria or the specific numerical performance results for each test. It only lists the tests performed and the standards they adhere to.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size for Test Set: Not specified in the provided document. The tests are "bench performance testing" on various syringe units.
• Data Provenance: Not specified, but generally, bench testing for physical devices is conducted in a controlled lab environment by the manufacturer. It is non-clinical.
• Retrospective or Prospective: Not applicable for this type of physical device testing.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

• Not Applicable. Ground truth for this physical device testing is established through standardized laboratory test methods and measurements against international or internal specifications, not by human experts interpreting clinical data.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

• Not Applicable. (See point 3)

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• No. This is not an AI/ML device. Therefore, no MRMC study or assessment of human reader improvement with AI assistance was conducted or is relevant.

6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

• No. This is not an AI/ML device. Therefore, no standalone algorithm performance was assessed. The performance tests are for the physical syringe itself.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

• The "ground truth" for this device's performance is based on measurements against established engineering specifications and international standards (e.g., ISO, ASTM, USP) for physical and material properties (e.g., force, leakage, volume accuracy, biocompatibility reactions). It is not based on expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data in the clinical sense.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

• Not Applicable. This is not an AI/ML device. There is no concept of a "training set" in the context of the reported non-clinical bench testing for a physical syringe.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

• Not Applicable. (See point 8)

Ask a specific question about this device

FORCYTE Autograft Harvest Kit is intended to harvest cancellous bone and bone marrow for combination with commercially available allograft or bone void fillers for filling bony voids or gaps that are not intrinsic to the stability of the bony structure.

The Subject device is a kit comprised of a bone and marrow harvesting needle, collection jar, suction tubing, drill-tip guide pin, and bone void filler hydration chamber. The FORCYTE system harvests autologous bone and marrow for use as a bone void filler.

Based on the provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the Forcyte Autograft Harvest Kit (K243407), the device is a Gastroenterology-Urology Biopsy Instrument. The letter explicitly states that "No clinical evaluations were conducted" for this device. This means that the 510(k) clearance relies solely on non-clinical (bench) testing, and therefore, it is not possible to provide acceptance criteria or a study description related to AI algorithm performance or diagnostic accuracy, human reader performance, or multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness studies from this document.

The information requested in the prompt (AI algorithm performance data, expert ground truth, MRMC studies, etc.) is typically associated with software as a medical device (SaMD) or AI/ML-enabled devices that perform diagnostic or prognostic functions based on image analysis, pattern recognition, etc. The Forcyte Autograft Harvest Kit, however, is a physical instrument for harvesting bone and bone marrow.

Therefore, many of the requested items are not applicable to the information provided in this 510(k) clearance letter. I will address the relevant points based on the document's content and explicitly state when information is not available.

Analysis of the Forcyte Autograft Harvest Kit (K243407) based on the Provided 510(k) Clearance Letter:

The Forcyte Autograft Harvest Kit (K243407) is a physical medical device, not an AI/ML-enabled device or software medical device. The 510(k) clearance for this device was based on non-clinical (bench) testing and substantial equivalence to a predicate device, not on clinical performance studies involving human readers or AI algorithms.

Therefore, most of the requested information regarding AI acceptance criteria, clinical study design (sample size, expert ground truth, MRMC), and training data is not applicable to this specific device and the provided document.

Here's an attempt to address each point based on the provided text, clarifying what information is present and what is absent:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

Based on the document, the acceptance criteria and performance data are related to the physical characteristics and functionality of the harvesting kit, not diagnostic accuracy.

Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance (Non-Clinical)

Note: The document states "All testing had satisfactory results" but does not provide specific numerical acceptance criteria or detailed numerical results for each test. The acceptance criteria are implicitly that the device performs as intended and meets safety requirements.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

• Sample Size for Test Set: Not specified in terms of number of units or test runs for the bench tests. The document only states "bench testing including simulated use testing, tensile, compression, torque, flexural, and vacuum testing were conducted."
• Data Provenance (Country of Origin, Retrospective/Prospective): Not specified. As these are bench tests, the concept of "retrospective" or "prospective" data collection from patients is not applicable. The tests would have been performed in a laboratory setting. No geographical origin of the testing data is mentioned.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

• Not Applicable. This device is a biopsy instrument, not an imaging or diagnostic AI device requiring expert interpretation for ground truth establishment. Bench testing does not typically involve "experts" establishing a "ground truth" in the diagnostic sense; rather, it involves engineers and quality control personnel assessing physical performance against specifications.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

• Not Applicable. As no expert interpretation or diagnostic "ground truth" was established, there was no need for an adjudication method. Bench testing results are typically assessed against pre-defined engineering and material specifications.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• No. The document explicitly states: "No clinical evaluations were conducted." Therefore, no MRMC study, human reader improvement, or AI assistance was involved in the clearance. This type of study is irrelevant for a physical bone harvesting instrument.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• Not Applicable. This is a physical medical device, not an algorithm or software. There is no "standalone" algorithm performance to evaluate.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

• Not Applicable in the diagnostic sense. For a physical device, "ground truth" is established by manufacturing specifications, engineering design, and material properties. The device's performance is measured against these established physical and functional parameters (e.g., tensile strength, proper vacuum seal, successful harvesting of material, biocompatibility).

8. The sample size for the training set

• Not Applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a "training set" of data.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• Not Applicable. As there is no training set for an AI/ML algorithm, no ground truth was established for it.

Ask a specific question about this device

The ProfojectTM Disposable Syringe and the ProfojectTM Disposable Syringe with Needle are intended to be used for medical purposes to inject fluid into or withdraw fluid from body.

The ProfojectTM Disposable Syringe is available in a sterile state. It is a single-use device comprising a polypropylene barrel with a Luer slip or Luer lock nozzle, a polypropylene plunger, and a polyisoprene rubber plunger stopper. Syringes are available in various volume specifications, ranging from 1mL to 60mL. The syringe barrel is printed with a legible graduated scale in milliliters. The syringe is compatible with U.S. legally marketed devices featuring Luer slip or Luer lock connectors that comply with ISO 80369-7. The syringe is intended for manual use only. The plunger of the syringe is pulled back to aspirate fluids or depressed to inject or expel fluids.

The ProfojectTM Disposable Syringe with Needle is supplied in a sterile state. It is a single-use device comprising a Luer slip or Luer lock syringe and a hypodermic needle. The hypodermic needle consists of a stainless steel needle tube, a polypropylene needle hub, and a polypropylene needle cap. The hypodermic needle is available in variety of combinations of needle gauge (18G, 20G, 21G, 22G, 23G, 25G, 26G, 27G) and needle length (15mm, 20mm, 25mm, 30mm, 38mm). Needle hubs are color-coded to identify the gauge of the needle tube. The Disposable Syringe with Needle is available in various combinations of syringe volume and needle size. It is intended for manual use only. The plunger of the syringe is pulled back to aspirate fluids or depressed to inject or expel fluids.

The provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter and summary for the Profoject™ Disposable Syringe and Profoject™ Disposable Syringe with Needle focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to a predicate device (K211211) through non-clinical testing. It does not describe a study involving an AI component, human readers, or a ground truth established in the way typical for AI/ML medical devices.

Therefore, the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, device performance, sample size for test sets, data provenance, expert ground truth establishment, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, and training set details are not applicable as this is a traditional medical device submission without an AI/ML component.

Instead, the submission relies on a comparison of technological characteristics and performance testing against recognized international standards for syringes and needles to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

Here's a summary based on the provided document, addressing the relevant points and noting where information is not applicable due to the nature of the device:

Acceptance Criteria and Study Details for Profoject™ Disposable Syringe

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The acceptance criteria for this device are based on compliance with a comprehensive set of international standards rather than specific performance metrics directly stated in a table for each criterion. The "reported device performance" is indicated by the statement that the tests met the requirements of these standards.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The document does not specify exact sample sizes for each test. It states that "the following tests have been performed" and that "the testing results demonstrate that the proposed device complies with the applicable standards requirements." For biocompatibility, performance, sterilization, package, and shelf-life testing, samples of the device were used as required by the specific standards.

• Sample Size: Not explicitly stated as a single number for a "test set." Samples were drawn and tested according to the requirements of each individual standard (e.g., ISO, ASTM, USP).
• Data Provenance: The tests were conducted by the manufacturer (CMT Health Pte. Ltd., based in Singapore) or their designated testing facilities to demonstrate compliance with international standards. This is prospective testing performed on manufactured devices.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications

N/A. This device is a traditional medical device (syringes) and not an AI/ML device requiring expert-established ground truth for a diagnostic test. The "ground truth" here is compliance with established engineering and biological safety standards.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

N/A. Not applicable to engineering performance and biocompatibility testing of a physical device. Test results are compared directly against the quantitative or qualitative pass/fail criteria defined within the referenced international standards.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done

N/A. This is a traditional medical device (syringe), not an AI-assisted diagnostic or interpretative device. Therefore, MRMC studies are not relevant.

6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

N/A. This device does not involve an AI algorithm. Its performance is evaluated through bench testing against established standards.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

The "ground truth" for this device's acceptance is defined by the objective, measurable requirements and pass/fail criteria specified within the referenced international and national standards (ISO, ASTM, USP) for its physical, chemical, and biological properties. This includes:

• Engineering specifications (e.g., dimensions, force required for operation, leak integrity).
• Material safety (biocompatibility, leachable substances).
• Sterility assurance.
• Packaging integrity.
• Shelf-life stability.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

N/A. This is a traditional medical device and does not involve machine learning algorithms requiring a training set.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

N/A. No training set is applicable for this device.

Ask a specific question about this device