Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K961628
    Device Name
    MINI FLEX COIL
    Date Cleared
    1996-09-05

    (132 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.1000
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K924349, K911806A

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Miniflex Coil is indicated for use in magnetic resonance imaging of the elbow, wrist, ankle, foot, orbits, or other body parts where a flexible coil may be employed.

    Device Description

    The Miniflex Coil is a receive-only coil designed for use with General Electric Medical System's 1.5T SIGNA MRI Scanner. The coil is designed to give better imaging quality than would be possible with the Body Coil, by maximizing signal reception by closely conforming to the specific body part to be imaged. The physical structure of the antenna consists of two figure-eight shaped coils in a flexible, fabric-covered material. This allows the coil to bend, making it easy to wrap around the anatomy of interest. The coil is fastened to the patient with flexible straps. All patient-contact materials are biocompatible and were chosen to maximize patient comfort. User instructions are contained in the User Manual provided with each device.

    AI/ML Overview

    I'm sorry, but the provided text describes a medical device (Miniflex Coil) and its technological characteristics and intended use. It does not contain information about acceptance criteria, a study proving the device meets those criteria, or any of the detailed metrics related to a study (sample size, data provenance, ground truth, expert qualifications, etc.).

    The document seems to be a premarket notification summary (510(k) submission) from 1996 for an MRI accessory, focusing on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices rather than presenting performance study results against predefined acceptance criteria. The only mention of "Imaging Quality" is a subjective statement: "Good to Excellent, compared to predicate devices," with "N/A" for the predicate devices, indicating this is not a quantified performance measure from a study.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them based on the provided input.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1