Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K992280
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1999-09-03

    (58 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.1710
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The 1-650 Mammography System is intended to produce radiographic images of the breast. Its specific intended use is for screening and diagnostic mammography. Screening mammography involves the production of images for initial examination for breast cancer diagnosis. Diagnostic mammography includes the production of magnified images for more thorough examination of areas of the breast determined suspicious through screening mammography, special views, spot compression views, and the production of images used by a physician in preparation for biopsy.

    Device Description

    The Lorad I-650 mammography system is based on Lorad's currently marketed D-550 (K934870) and Elite (K973631) Dedicated Mammographic Systems. The mechanical packaging is similar to the D-550, while the electronics are similar to the Elite. The Lorad I-650 is a standalone mammography device, mounted on a base to be permanently mounted in position. The unit is AC powered, and must be connected to a 220 VAC/50-60 Hertz (nominal) line to operate. The standalone unit has two major assemblies: The C-arm and the Gantry. The C-arm, which contains the x-ray tube, an image receptor support, compression device, a beam limiting device, switches that actuate the C-arm functions, and sensors for detecting installed accessories and making radiation measurements, is attached to the front (patient side) of the Gantry. The C-arm frame is constructed of two vertical steel rails, which are precision machined to accept the components which it supports. Molded plastic covers enclose the x-ray tube, which is purchased from OEM manufacturers, and the beam limiting device, while aluminum covers enclose the sides, back, top and bottom of the C-arm framework. The C-arm is attached by a locking pivot mechanism to the Gantry. The pivot allows the C-arm to be manually rotated about its axis. The pivot mechanism is attached to the Gantry via a vertically moving carriage. This carriage is capable of movement in the vertical direction, driven by an AC motor and a drive screw mounted to the base of the Gantry. The pivoting action of the C-arm is locked by an electromagnetic brake attached to the vertical carriage, which, in its unactuated condition, prevents rotation. The brake must be electrically actuated to release the C-arm for movement. The Gantry is constructed of a welded steel frame, to which the electrical assemblies and components of the unit are mounted. The operator control is mounted on the side panel of the Gantry, or may be mounted remotely. The input power and input circuit breaker are located on the lower rear panel of the Gantry.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document describes the Lorad I-650 Mammography System. Here's an analysis of the provided text for acceptance criteria and the study proving it:

    Key Takeaway: This document is a 510(k) summary for a mammography system. The "acceptance criteria" are primarily regulatory and performance specifications for the device itself, rather than acceptance criteria for an AI algorithm. The "study" described is a series of bench tests to verify these specifications, not a clinical trial involving human readers or AI performance.


    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (Table)

    The document outlines numerous specifications for the Lorad I-650 Mammography System, which serve as its acceptance criteria. The "reported device performance" are the results from the non-clinical testing.

    Acceptance Criteria CategorySpecific Criteria / SpecificationReported Device Performance / Result
    Focal Spot MeasurementLarge focal spot (nominal 0.3 mm): Max dimensions = 0.45mm W x 0.65mm LLarge: 25kV (0.47mm L x 0.33mm W), 28kV (0.46mm L x 0.31mm W), 30kV (0.46mm L x 0.30mm W)
    Small focal spot (nominal 0.1 mm): Max dimensions = 0.15mm W x 0.15mm LSmall: 25kV (0.11mm L x 0.087mm W), 28kV (0.11mm L x <0.10mm W), 30kV (0.11mm L x <0.10mm W)
    System Resolution (MQSA)Lines parallel to tube axis = 13 lp/mm minimumLarge: 14 lp/mm (for 25, 28, 30 kV). Small: 19 lp/mm (25 kV); 16 lp/mm (28 kV); 15 lp/mm (30 kV)
    Lines perpendicular to tube axis = 11 lp/mm minimumLarge: 16 lp/mm (for 25, 28, 30 kV). Small: 19 lp/mm (for 25, 28, 30 kV)
    ACR Object Phantom Tests (Image Quality)Fibers: 4 minimumPhantom Film 1 & 2: 4.5
    Specks: 3 minimumPhantom Film 1 & 2: 3.5
    Masses: 3 minimumPhantom Film 1 & 2: 4
    Total Score: 10 minimumPhantom Film 1 & 2: 12
    Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) (ACR)3 mGy limit for Screening Mammography ImagePhantom Film 1: 1.48 mGy. Phantom Film 2: 1.71 mGy
    Optical Density (Phantom Film)- (Implicitly aiming for ~1.5 average OD for phantom images)Phantom Film 1 & 2: 1.52
    Contrast Diff. Ratio (ACR)0.40 minimum (Avg. density - contrast disk)Phantom Film 1: 0.48. Phantom Film 2: 0.50
    AEC Tracking (MQSA)Optical density of any film within 0.15 OD of the Mean optical density for 2-6 cm breast tissue equivalent material.Large focal spot - contact- Molybdenum filter: Mean OD = 1.52 +0.11/-0.10 Large focal spot - contact - Rhodium filter: Mean OD = 1.50 +0.15/-0.13 Small focal spot - magnification - Molybdenum filter: Mean OD = 1.51 +0.10/-0.13 (All results verify within MQSA requirements for 2002)
    Stereotactic Localization AccuracySpecified Accuracy ±1 mm for X, Y, Z coordinates (for a simulated lesion at X=10mm, Y=20mm, Z=30mm)Localized Results: X=10.1 (Error 0.1), Y=20.4 (Error 0.4), Z=30.1 (Error 0.1). Cumulative Error = 0.42 mm. Results meet specification.
    Radiation OutputMo/Mo, large focal spot, 28 kV: >= 800 mR/second for at least 3 seconds (through compression paddle at entrance surface of breast)(No specific numerical result provided in the "Results" section, but implicitly met as part of overall performance)
    Light Field to X-ray Field CongruencyWithin 1% of the SID (0.65 cm) at all edges of the defined x-ray field (21 CFR 2% total)(No specific numerical result provided in the "Results" section, but implicitly met as part of overall performance)
    Light Field IlluminanceMinimum 160 lux (21 CFR, subchapter J. section 1020.31)(No specific numerical result provided in the "Results" section, but implicitly met as part of overall performance)
    Reproducibility (Exposures)Less than 0.05 coefficient of variation for 10 consecutive exposures (as per 21 CFR, internal spec 0.04)(No specific numerical result provided in the "Results" section, but implicitly met as part of overall performance, referenced back to this section from AEC Tracking)
    Linearity (Radiation Output vs. mAs)Less than 0.10 for adjacent mAs selections: (X1-X2) <= 0.10(X1+X2) (21CFR)(No specific numerical result provided in the "Results" section, but implicitly met)
    Accuracy (kVp)Not differ by more than 1 kV from indicated value; difference between 2 actual kV stations in compliance with indicated values.(No specific numerical result provided in the "Results" section, but implicitly met)
    Accuracy (mAs)±5% from indicated(No specific numerical result provided in the "Results" section, but implicitly met)
    Compression Force Display Accuracy±3 lb. from 10 lb. to 35 lb.; ±5 lb. Above 35 lb.(No specific numerical result provided in the "Results" section, but implicitly met)
    Compression Thickness Accuracy±0.5 cm. at thickness between 0.5 and 10 cm. ±0.8 cm. at thickness greater than 10 cm.(No specific numerical result provided in the "Results" section, but implicitly met)
    Maximum System Input Impedance0.25 ohms(No specific numerical result provided)
    Tube Voltage Range22 kVp to 39 kVp maximumListed performance implies this range is achievable.
    Tube Current - Large Focus80 mA max.Listed kV/mA range includes 80 mA for Large Focus.
    Tube Current - Small Focus20 mA max.Listed kV/mA range includes 20 mA for Small Focus.
    Anode Rotation3400 rpm (60Hz), 2800rpm (50Hz)(No specific numerical result provided)
    Anode Heat Storage210 kJ (300 kHU)(No specific numerical result provided)
    Maximum Anode Heat Dissipation Rate525 W (740 HU/s)(No specific numerical result provided)
    Housing Heat Storage Capacity610 kJ (860 kHU) min.(No specific numerical result provided)
    Maximum Housing Heat Dissipation Rate72 W (6 kHU/min) w/o air, 300 W (25 kHU/min) with air(No specific numerical result provided)
    X-ray Tube Housing/Head Cover Temp.Max Surface Temp: Housing 55°C, Head Cover 41°C(No specific numerical result provided)
    Beam Quality (HVL)Mo/Mo: kVp/100+0.03 <= HVL <= kVp/100+0.12 (mm Al) Mo/Rh: kVp/100+0.03 <= HVL <= kVp/100+0.19 (mm Al)(No specific numerical result provided)
    High Voltage Generator RippleTypically <= 2% (max 4% at lower output/line voltages)(No specific numerical result provided)
    Post-mAs Display Accuracy±5% of actual mAs(No specific numerical result provided)

    Study Details (as related to the provided document)

    This document describes a medical device submission (510(k)) for a mammography system. It focuses on the technical specifications and non-clinical performance validation of the X-ray machine itself, not an AI algorithm. Therefore, many of the requested points for AI studies are not applicable.

    1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):

      • Focal Spot Measurement: Not specified in terms of "sample size" of X-ray images, but tests were done at 3 kV settings (25, 28, 30 kV). Data provenance is "bench tests" performed by the manufacturer (Lorad Division of Trex Medical Corporation, Danbury, Connecticut).
      • System Resolution: Not specified in terms of "sample size," but tests were done at 3 kV settings (25, 28, 30 kV) for both focal spots. Data provenance is "bench tests."
      • Object Phantom Tests: Two phantom films were generated. This refers to the number of physical phantom images evaluated. Data provenance is "bench tests."
      • AEC Tracking: Exposures were obtained using breast tissue equivalent materials ranging from 2 cm to 8 cm thickness across various kV settings (e.g., 25-30kV). No specific "sample size" of exposures is given for each condition, but the results table lists 6 conditions for Mo/Mo large focal spot, 3 for Rh large focal spot, and 6 for Mo small focal spot, with multiple thicknesses evaluated for each. Data provenance is "bench tests."
      • Stereotactic Localization: One simulated lesion was targeted and localized. Data provenance is "bench tests."
    2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience):

      • Object Phantom Tests: "three readers" were used to score each of the two phantom films. Their qualifications are not specified beyond being "readers."
      • For other tests (Focal Spot, System Resolution, AEC Tracking, Stereotactic Localization), the "ground truth" was derived from physical measurements against known standards or specifications, not human expert interpretation of images.
    3. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

      • Object Phantom Tests: The results were "averaged" from the three readers. No formal adjudication (like 2+1 or 3+1 consensus) is described.
      • Not applicable to other tests as ground truth was not based on human consensus.
    4. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

      • No. This document pertains to the primary performance of a mammography X-ray system itself, not an AI or CAD system used to assist human readers. Therefore, no MRMC study or effect size related to AI assistance is present.
    5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

      • No. This document is about a hardware medical device (mammography machine), not an AI algorithm. Its performance is evaluated inherently in a "standalone" fashion as a machine, through physical measurements and phantom imaging tests. The "algorithm" here would refer to the machine's internal controls (like AEC), which were tested for their inherent accuracy and reproducibility.
    6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc):

      • Physical Measurements against Standards/Specifications:
        • Focal Spot Size: Measured physically against NEMA method criteria.
        • System Resolution: Measured from images of line pair bar patterns against MQSA minimums.
        • Object Phantom Tests: Scored visually by readers against ACR/MQSA minimums (e.g., number of discernible fibers, specks, masses). The "ground truth" is the objective presence of these elements in the phantom.
        • AEC Tracking: Measured optical density (OD) consistency against MQSA optical density variation limits using breast tissue equivalent materials.
        • Stereotactic Localization: Comparison of localized coordinates to a known, pre-set 3D position.
      • Referenced Regulatory Standards: Many "acceptance criteria" are derived directly from regulatory bodies like MQSA, ACR, NEMA, IEC, and 21 CFR.
    7. The sample size for the training set:

      • Not applicable. This document describes a physical mammography system, not an AI model. There is no concept of a "training set" in this context. The device's internal parameters and controls (e.g., AEC calibration) are set during manufacturing and validated through the non-clinical tests described.
    8. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

      • Not applicable. As there is no AI training set, this question does not apply.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1