Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K990454
    Date Cleared
    1999-07-01

    (139 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3040
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Bio-Interference Screw is intended for fixation of soft tissue grafts or bone-tendon-bone grafts during cruciate ligament reconstruction surgeries of the knee.

    Device Description

    The Bio-Interference Screw is a biodegradable interference screw intended for interference fit fixation of soft tissue grafts or bone-tendon-bone grafts during cruciate ligament reconstruction surgeries of the knee. The device is offered in varying diameters and lengths.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the 510(k) premarket notification for the Innovasive Bio-Interference Screw. Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them, based only on the provided information:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    Acceptance CriteriaDevice Performance
    Substantially equivalent ultimate holding strength to predicate deviceTesting demonstrates substantially equivalent performance between the Innovasive Bio-Interference Screw and the Arthrex Bio-Interference Screw.

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

    The document does not explicitly state the sample size used for the bone model testing or the data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective). It only mentions "Bone Model Testing."

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    This information is not provided in the document. The study involves mechanical testing on a bone model, not expert assessment of images or data that would require "ground truth" established by experts in the typical sense for medical imaging algorithms.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set

    This information is not applicable and not provided. The study involves mechanical testing, not a process that would typically require adjudication.

    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    An MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This document describes a medical device (an interference screw) and its mechanical performance, not an AI algorithm for diagnosis or interpretation that would typically involve human readers.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

    This is not applicable. The device is a physical medical implant, not a standalone algorithm.

    7. The type of ground truth used

    The "ground truth" in this context is the mechanical performance of the predicate device (Arthrex Bio-Interference Screw). The Innovasive Bio-Interference Screw's performance was compared directly to this established device. This is a form of functional equivalence based on established device performance.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    This information is not applicable and not provided. The device is not an AI algorithm that would have a "training set."

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    This information is not applicable and not provided, as there is no "training set" for this type of medical device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1