Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K213262
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2022-01-07

    (99 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.2800
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Celerity™ HP Chemical Indicator is a vaporized hydrogen peroxide multivariable chemical indicator. It is designed for routine monitoring of the following cycles:

    · Lumen, Non Lumen, Flexible, Fast Non Lumen or Fast sterilization cycle of a V-PRO® Low Temperature Sterilization System, or

    • Standard, Advanced, Express, Flex or Duo cycles of an ASP STERRAD® System, including those systems with ALLClear Technology.

    Device Description

    The Celerity™ HP Chemical Indicator is a chemical indicator strip consisting of indicator ink containing the reactive chemicals printed on one end of a polypropylene strip. If the critical variables are achieved, the color of the indicator ink changes from magenta to orange/yellow or lighter yellow when exposed to the V-PRO® Low Temperature Sterilization System cycles or ASP STERRAD® System cycles. The indicator is validated to function as a multiple variable indicator with increased resistance characteristics similar to ISO 11140-1:2014 end points for a Type 4 Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP) Chemical Indicator (CI). No changes have been made to the device other than additional testing and updating the labeling for multivariable indicator claims.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the acceptance criteria and study results for the CELERITY HP Chemical Indicator, a medical device used to monitor sterilization cycles. Here's a breakdown of the information requested:

    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance

    1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

    TestingPurposeAcceptance CriteriaStudy Result
    Multivariable CI Performance TestingDemonstrates that the indicator reacts to all critical variables (time, temperature, and sterilant concentration) of the sterilization process.Pass testing per Table 8 of ISO 11140-1:2014 (complete color change)Pass. All CI show a complete color change.
    Fail testing per Table 8 of ISO 11140-1:2014 (incomplete color change)Pass. All CI show an incomplete color change.
    Endpoint color stabilityDemonstrates that the processed indicator color does not significantly change over the labeled time period.Color remains stablePass. Color stable up to 15 months.
    Simulated Use Testing (Leveraged from K192020)Demonstrates that the indicator performs as expected in a commercial sterilizer with worst-case load.Complete color change in a full cycle. Incomplete color change in an abbreviated cycle.Pass. Complete color change in a full cycle. Incomplete color change in an abbreviated cycle.

    Regarding the other information, the provided text does NOT contain details about the following aspects, which are typically relevant for AI/ML-based medical devices or studies involving human readers:

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: This information is not explicitly stated. The study refers to "All CI" for the multivariable performance, implying a batch of Chemical Indicators were tested. The provenance (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is also not detailed, though the manufacturing facility is in the United Kingdom.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and their qualifications: This device is a chemical indicator that shows a color change, not an AI/ML system requiring expert interpretation of images. Therefore, expert consensus on ground truth in that context is not applicable. The "ground truth" here is the physical reaction of the chemical indicator to specific sterilization parameters as defined by ISO standards.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable for a chemical indicator.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, and if so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This is a physical chemical indicator, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This is a physical chemical indicator.

    7. The type of ground truth used: The ground truth for this device's performance is established by ISO 11140-1:2014 standards for chemical indicators and verified by subjecting the indicators to controlled sterilization conditions with specified time, temperature, and sterilant concentration. The "complete color change" and "incomplete color change" are the physical manifestations defining the ground truth.

    8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This is an engineered chemical product, not a machine learning model that requires a training set.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1