Search Results

The TrapLiner catheter is intended for use in conjunction with guide catheters to access discrete regions of the coronary and/or peripheral vasculature, to facilitate placement of interventional devices, and to facilitate the exchange of an interventional device while maintaining the position of a guidewire within the vasculature.

The TrapLiner catheter is a rapid-exchange guide extension catheter with a trapping balloon on the distal end of the pushrod. The stainless steel pushrod is covered on the distal end by a semi-circular polymer ('half-pipe') and transitions to a hydrophilic coated full-round polymer guide extension section. There are two radiopaque marker bands on the guide extension segment, one on the distal tip and one on the collar. The trapping balloon is located proximal to the half-pipe and has a single radiopaque gold marker under the proximal end of the balloon.

I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets those criteria in the context of an AI/ML medical device.

The document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for a medical device called the "TrapLiner catheter." This device is a physical catheter used in interventional procedures, not an AI/ML algorithm.

The core of the document discusses:

• The FDA's determination of substantial equivalence to a predicate device.
• The intended use of the catheter.
• A comparison of technological characteristics with a predicate device, noting a "geometry improvement at the distal end of the pushrod."
• Bench tests conducted to evaluate this design change (e.g., Track Force, Guide Catheter Backup Support, Balloon Fatigue, etc.).

There is no mention of:

• Acceptance criteria for an AI/ML algorithm's performance (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC).
• A sample size for a test set or training set for an AI/ML model.
• Data provenance, expert ground truth establishment, or adjudication methods for an AI/ML model.
• Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness studies related to AI assistance.
• Standalone performance of an AI algorithm.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves an AI/ML device meets them based on the provided text.

Ask a specific question about this device