Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K160052
    Device Name
    CUR Model 1
    Date Cleared
    2016-05-20

    (130 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    882.5890
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) Mode which is indicated for the symptomatic relief and management of chronic intractable pain, and for temporary relief of pain associated with sore and aching muscles in the shoulder, waist, back, neck, upper extremities (arm) and lower extremities (leg) due to strain from exercise or normal household work activities. , and

    A powered muscle stimulation (PMS) mode which is indicated to improve and facilitate muscle performance in healthy muscles.

    The CUR Model 1 should be applied to normal, healthy, dry and clean skin of adult patients.

    Device Description

    CUR is a high-quality wearable medical device that provides professional-grade TENS therapy along with an easy-to-use interface and compact aesthetic design. It is comprised of the main CUR device, a disposable gel pad, and a charging cable with AC adapter for recharging the device.

    A use session typically begins with the user placing the Gel Pad on the skin near the location of pain, attaching the CUR Device to the Gel Pad using the magnetic attachment points on the bottom surface of the Device and on the plastic connector of the Gel Pad. The user then presses the power "start/stop" button on the Device to begin treatment. The user may use buttons on the Device labeled with standard ISO "+" and "-" symbols to control the intensity of treatment. They also may connect the Device to a compatible Mobile Device via Bluetooth and control treatment through the CUR Mobile App. After treatment is finished, the user may leave the Device attached to the Gel Pad until the next treatment session, or may remove the Device from the Gel Pad and attach the Device to the Charging Base using the magnetic attachment points on the Device and Charging Base to store and re-charge the Device.

    CUR Model 1 may be used for pain relief on most parts of the body. Intended placements include:

    • Shoulder ●
    • Waist ●
    • Back
    • Neck
    • Upper extremities (arm) ●
    • Lower extremities (leg)

    Do not place CUR Model 1 on the throat, chest, or head.

    The disposable Gel Pad utilizes a high-quality polyacrylate hydrogel material that provides excellent patient comfort, biocompatibility, and adherence to a wide range of skin types. Pads typically last about 6-10 days with regular daily use and storage before needing to be replaced. And since the Device uses an internal rechargeable battery for power, no other batteries or consumables are needed offering increased convenience and positive benefit to the environment.

    The Mobile App provides access to treatment controls and usage instructions for the device from a compatible mobile device. This is an added convenience for cases where the user would rather adjust the treatment from their mobile devices rather than directly from the app and also a means of providing detailed warnings and usage instructions information in a portable way that the user can access at any time.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the Thimble Bioelectronics CUR Model 1, a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS) and powered muscle stimulation (PMS) device. The document primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices rather than directly presenting a standalone study for the device against specific acceptance criteria.

    However, based on the non-clinical testing section and the comparison tables, we can infer the acceptance criteria are largely related to meeting established electrical performance specifications and international safety/performance standards.

    Here's an analysis of the requested information:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    Since specific acceptance criteria are not explicitly listed in a direct "acceptance criteria table" in the document, these are inferred from the technological characteristics comparison with predicate devices and the non-clinical testing performed against recognized standards. The "reported device performance" refers to the CUR Model 1's measured electrical specifications.

    Acceptance Criterion (Inferred)Reported Device Performance (CUR Model 1)Justification/Reference
    Electrical Safety Standards ComplianceComplies with IEC 60601-1:2012, IEC 60601-2-10:2012, IEC 60601-1-11:2010"Verification and validation test results established that the device meets its intended use... including compliance with the following standards: Safety: IEC 60601-1... IEC 60601-2-10... IEC 60601-1-11" (Page 10)
    EMC Standards ComplianceComplies with IEC 60601-1-2:2014, FCC Part 15"EMC: IEC 60601-1-2:2014... FCC part 15" (Page 10)
    Software Standards ComplianceComplies with IEC 62304:2006"Software: IEC 62304:2006" (Page 10)
    Usability Standards ComplianceComplies with IEC 62366-1:2015"Usability: IEC 62366-1:2015" (Page 10)
    Biocompatibility Standards ComplianceComplies with ISO 10993-5:2009, ISO 10993-10:2010"Biocompatibility: ISO 10993-5:2009... ISO 10993-10:2010" (Page 10)
    Patient Leakage Current (Normal Condition)< 10 µA (Battery powered)Table 2: Basic Unit Characteristics Comparison Table (Page 6). Matches predicate devices.
    Patient Leakage Current (Single Fault Condition)< 50 µA (Battery powered)Table 2: Basic Unit Characteristics Comparison Table (Page 6). Matches predicate devices.
    Average DC Current through Electrodes< 0.1 µATable 2: Basic Unit Characteristics Comparison Table (Page 6). Better than one predicate, matches other.
    Automatic Overload TripYesTable 2: Basic Unit Characteristics Comparison Table (Page 6). Matches predicate devices.
    Automatic No-Load TripYesTable 2: Basic Unit Characteristics Comparison Table (Page 6). Matches predicate devices.
    Automatic Shut OffYesTable 2: Basic Unit Characteristics Comparison Table (Page 6). Matches predicate devices.
    Maximum Output Voltage (TENS)42.6V @ 500Ω to 87.8V @ 10kΩ (depending on mode)Table 3: Output Specification for TENS Mode Comparison Table (Page 7). Comparable to predicate devices.
    Maximum Output Current (TENS)8.8 mA @ 10kΩ to 86.3 mA @ 500Ω (depending on mode)Table 3: Output Specification for TENS Mode Comparison Table (Page 7). Comparable to predicate devices.
    Maximum Phase Charge (TENS)4.14 µC @ 500Ω to 7.45 µC @ 500Ω (depending on mode)Table 3: Output Specification for TENS Mode Comparison Table (Page 8). Comparable to predicate devices.
    Maximum Output Voltage (PMS)38.4V @ 500Ω to 85.0V @ 10kΩTable 4: Output Specifications for EMS Mode Comparison Table (Page 9). Comparable to predicate device.
    Maximum Output Current (PMS)8.1 mA @ 10kΩ to 76.7 mA @ 500ΩTable 4: Output Specifications for EMS Mode Comparison Table (Page 9). Comparable to predicate device.
    Maximum Phase Charge (PMS)16.21 µC @ 500ΩTable 4: Output Specifications for EMS Mode Comparison Table (Page 9). Comparable to predicate device.

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    The document states, "Thimble determined that bench and non-clinical testing were sufficient to demonstrate that the CUR Model 1 device is as safe and effective as the predicate devices." (Page 10)

    • Sample Size: Not specified for non-clinical testing, but typically refers to a statistically significant number of test units or components tested according to engineering and quality assurance protocols for device performance, and materials tested for biocompatibility. No human subject data (test set) is mentioned for clinical performance.
    • Data Provenance: The tests are described as "bench and non-clinical testing" conducted by Thimble Bioelectronics (a US company, based on the address). This indicates laboratory or bench-top testing rather than clinical data from patients. The document does not specify the country of origin of the data or if it was retrospective or prospective in a clinical sense, as it was non-clinical.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    Not applicable. The document states that no clinical testing was performed to establish ground truth from human experts. The assessment was based on non-clinical engineering and performance testing against established standards and comparison to predicate devices, not on expert interpretations of medical results.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    Not applicable. As no clinical test set with human data or expert review was conducted, no adjudication method was used.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    Not applicable. This device is a TENS/PMS stimulator, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or interpretive device. No MRMC study was performed, nor would it be relevant for this type of medical device which directly delivers electrical stimulation.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

    Not applicable. This device does not involve an "algorithm only" component in the sense of AI or diagnostic interpretation. Its "performance" is its ability to generate electrical signals according to specifications. The device operates either directly through physical buttons or via a mobile app interface.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

    The "ground truth" for the device's acceptable performance is defined by compliance with recognized international safety and performance standards (e.g., IEC 60601 series, ISO 10993 series, FCC Part 15) and by meeting its own design specifications as verified through electrical, mechanical, and software testing. It also uses the performance characteristics of legally marketed predicate devices (NeuroMetrix ASCEND and Philips Consumer Lifestyle PulseRelief) as a basis for demonstrating substantial equivalence. No clinical "ground truth" (e.g., pain relief scores, muscle performance measurements) from patient outcomes was used in this submission.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    Not applicable. There is no mention of a "training set" as this is not an AI/machine learning device.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    Not applicable, as no training set was used.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1