Search Results

The DripAssist is a device intended to be used as a supplementary monitor that measures the flow of fluid through the drip chamber of a standard IV administration set. Sensors measure the flow rate and calculations are performed to convert the drip rate to ml/hr measurement and total volume. An alarm is available to alert the drip rate deviates from the infusion rate setting controlled through the IV administration set.

The DripAssist device is intended to be used as a supplementary monitoring system for monitoring the flow rate of intravenous fluids. The DripAssist is a passive device. It does not control the flow rate of fluids passing through a drip chamber. The device operates by monitoring the drops through the drip chamber of a standard IV administration set. By tracking the intervals between drops, the device calculates the flow rate through the chamber and displays the flow rate on an LCD screen. The device operates by tracking drops using an infrared emitter and detector positioned on opposite sides of a well wherein the drip chamber is situated. There is an alarm functionality that can be activated once a desired flow rate, or "set point," is reached. The alarm, when activated, will sound when the flow rate deviates from a fixed percentage from the "set point."

Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the DripAssist device, based on the provided text:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance

Study Information

1. Sample Size used for the test set and the data provenance:

   • The provided text does not specify the exact sample size for each performance test (Drip Rate Accuracy, Alarm Accuracy, EMC, Design Verification and Validation).
   • The data provenance is not explicitly stated (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective). These are non-clinical performance tests conducted on the device itself, rather than clinical studies on patients.

2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

   • This information is not provided. Given these are performance tests of a physical device measuring flow rates, the "ground truth" would likely be established through highly calibrated measurement equipment or standard reference methods, rather than expert human interpretation.

3. Adjudication method for the test set:

   • This is not applicable as the studies described are performance tests of a physical device against predefined metrics, not human-interpreted data requiring adjudication.

4. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

   • No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. The DripAssist is an IV flow rate monitor, not an AI-powered diagnostic device. The studies were focused on the device's accuracy and performance.

5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:

   • Yes, the described studies (Drip Rate Accuracy Test, Alarm Accuracy Test, EMC, Design Verification and Validation) are standalone performance tests of the device itself (algorithm and hardware combined) without human-in-the-loop performance being evaluated as a primary outcome. The device's function is to monitor and alert, it does not involve human interpretation of complex data.

6. The type of ground truth used:

   • For the Drip Rate Accuracy Test, the ground truth would typically be established by a highly accurate, calibrated flow meter or precise measurement of dispensed volume over time.
   • For the Alarm Accuracy Test, the ground truth would be the actual flow rate deviation measured by calibrated equipment.
   • For EMC, the ground truth is adherence to the specified IEC standard.
   • For Design Verification and Validation, the ground truth would be the pre-defined design specifications and user requirements.

7. The sample size for the training set:

   • This information is not applicable. The DripAssist is not an AI/machine learning device that requires a "training set" in the conventional sense for developing a predictive algorithm. It operates based on pre-programmed logic for infrared detection, calculations, and alarm triggers.

8. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

   • This information is not applicable, as there is no "training set" for this type of device.

Ask a specific question about this device