Search Results

The TheyFit male condom is used for contraceptive and for prophylactic purposes (to help prevent pregnancy and the transmission of sexually transmitted infections).

The TheyFit Male Condom is made of a natural rubber latex sheath, which completely covers the penis with a closely fitted membrane. The condom is shaped with a reservoir end and is flat with a cylindrical shape. TheyFit condoms are available in 34 sizes, of different length/width combinations. TheyFit Condoms are provided pre-lubricated with a silicone-based lubricant. TheyFit condoms are not provided with spermicide. The user must use a fitting kit (FitKit) to select the appropriate size TheyFit Condom.

The provided text describes the 510(k) summary for the TheyFit Male Condom, detailing its performance data and substantial equivalence to a predicate device. Here's an analysis to extract the requested information:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

• Sample Size for Test Set: 203 condom use surveys (for the clinical performance study).
• Data Provenance: The study was a "customer survey clinical study" with participants "recruited from TheyFit customers who had ordered a condom in the eligible size range." This indicates a prospective, real-world usage study, likely originating from TheyFit's customer base, which would be international given the global nature of product sales but no specific country of origin is mentioned.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts:

• Number of Experts: Not applicable. The clinical performance study was a self-report survey conducted by customers.
• Qualifications of Experts: Not applicable. The data was based on user self-reports.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

• Adjudication Method: Not applicable in the traditional sense of expert adjudication. The study relied on customer self-reports. However, there was an interpretation of the self-reported data regarding slippage during withdrawal (whether to count it as clinical or user error), referencing ISO/DIS 29943-1:2014 guidance. This could be considered a form of interpretation or categorization based on a standard, rather than expert adjudication of individual cases.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

• MRMC Study: No, this type of study was not conducted. The device is a male condom, not an AI-powered diagnostic or interpretive tool.

6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

• Standalone Performance: Not applicable. The device is a physical medical device (condom), not an algorithm. The clinical performance study evaluated the device's physical function in human use.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):

• Ground Truth: For clinical performance, the ground truth was based on self-reported outcomes data from users regarding breakages and slippages during actual use.

8. The sample size for the training set:

• Sample Size for Training Set: Not applicable. The document describes studies for a physical medical device (condom), not a machine learning model that would require a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

• Ground Truth for Training Set: Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device and study.

Ask a specific question about this device