Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K132508
    Date Cleared
    2013-09-23

    (42 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    866.3980
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel is intended for use in realtime RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) assays on an Applied Biosystems (ABI) 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument in conjunction with clinical and epidemiological information:

    • . For qualitative detection of influenza virus type A or B from viral RNA in upper respiratory tract clinical specimens (including nasopharyngeal swabs [NPS], nasal swabs [NS], throat swabs [TS], nasal aspirates [NA], nasal washes [NW] and dual nasopharyngeal/throat swabs [NPS/TS]), and lower respiratory tract specimens (including bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL], bronchial wash [BW], tracheal aspirate [TA], sputum, and lung tissue) from human patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection and/or from viral culture:
    • For determination of the subtype of seasonal human influenza A viruses as seasonal A/H1, . A/H3, and/or A/H1pdm09 from viral RNA in upper respiratory tract clinical specimens (including NPS, NS. TS. NA. NW and NPS/TS) and lower respiratory tract specimens (including BAL, BW, TA, sputum and lung tissue) from human patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection and/or from viral culture;
    • For the determination of the genetic lineage of human influenza B viruses as B/Victoria or ● B/Yamagata lineage from viral RNA in upper respiratory tract clinical specimens (including NPS, NS, TS, NA, NW, and NPS/TS) from human patients with signs and symptoms of respiratory infection and/or from viral culture;
    • . For the presumptive identification of virus in patients who may be infected with influenza A subtype A/H5 (Asian lineage) from viral RNA in human respiratory specimens and viral culture in conjunction with clinical and epidemiological risk factors;
    • To provide epidemiological information for surveillance of circulating influenza viruses. .
    Device Description

    The CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel is used in real-time RT-PCR assays (rRT-PCR) on the ABI 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument. The device consists of oligonucleotide primers and dual-labeled hydrolysis (TaqMan®) probes to be used in rRT-PCR for the in vitro qualitative detection and characterization of human influenza viruses from viral RNA in respiratory specimens from patients presenting with influenza-like illness (ILI).

    The CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel is based on technology which is used in many molecular diagnostic assays. rRT-PCR assays are one-tube assays that first reverse-transcribe specific regions of RNA into cDNA copies. The cDNA then serves as a template for a polymerase chain reaction that utilizes thermocyclic heating and cooling of the reaction to logarithmically amplify a specific region of DNA. The probe anneals to a specific internal target sequence located between the target loci of the forward and reverse primers. During the extension phase of the 5' exonuclease activity of Tag polymerase degrades any probe molecules hybridized to amplified target sequence, causing the reporter dye to separate from the quencher dye, and generating a fluorescent signal. With each cycle, additional reporter dye molecules are cleaved from their respective probes, increasing the fluorescence intensity. Fluorescence intensity is monitored at each PCR cycle. The amplification of each target is reflected by a logarithmic increase in fluorescence in comparison to the background signal.

    AI/ML Overview

    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance Study for K132508

    This submission, K132508, describes modifications to the CDC Human Influenza Virus Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel to add the capability to differentiate the two major lineages of influenza B viruses (B/Victoria or B/Yamagata). The predicate device is K130551.

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The acceptance criteria are primarily demonstrated through analytical performance studies (Limit of Detection, Inclusivity, and Exclusivity) and clinical performance studies (Prospective and Retrospective). The specific quantitative acceptance criteria for percent agreement in clinical studies are implicitly represented by the reported 95% Confidence Intervals.

    Acceptance Criteria CategorySpecific Criteria/MetricReported Device Performance (K132508)
    Analytical SensitivityLimit of Detection (LOD)B/Victoria: 102.1 EID50/mL (Invitrogen SuperScript™), 101.4 EID50/mL (Quanta qScript™) B/Yamagata: 103.5 EID50/mL (Invitrogen SuperScript™), 102.8 EID50/mL (Quanta qScript™) (Determined by testing 20 replicates of the highest virus dilution where ≥95% tested positive)
    InclusivityInfluenza B/Victoria & B/Yamagata Lineage: Reactive with all (10/10 each lineage) tested isolates at low concentrations (near LOD), with 3/3 replicates positive for almost all isolates and both enzyme systems (one instance of 2/3 for B/Yamagata with Quanta qScript™).
    Analytical SpecificityExclusivity (Cross-reactivity with opposite B lineage)No cross-reactivity detected with 10 influenza B viruses of the opposite lineage at high titer (3/3 InfB positive, 0/3 VIC/YAM positive) for both enzyme systems.
    Exclusivity (Cross-reactivity with Influenza A)No cross-reactivity detected with 8 influenza A viruses of various subtypes at high titer (all InfB, VIC, YAM results were negative for both enzyme systems).
    Exclusivity (Cross-reactivity with other respiratory pathogens/flora)No cross-reactivity detected with 35 non-influenza organisms (16 viruses, 18 bacteria, 1 yeast) at high concentrations (all InfB, VIC, YAM results were negative for both enzyme systems). 100% concordance with expected results across all exclusivity testing.
    PrecisionWithin-laboratory Precision (Agreement & %CV)B/Victoria Moderate: InfB 100%, VIC 100% agreement (96/96); %CV < 6%. B/Victoria Low: InfB 94.8% (91/96), VIC 71.9% (69/96) agreement. B/Victoria High Negative: InfB 94.8% (91/96), VIC 100% agreement (96/96). B/Yamagata Moderate: InfB 100%, YAM 100% agreement (96/96); %CV < 6%. B/Yamagata Low: InfB 97.9% (94/96), YAM 97.9% (94/96) agreement. B/Yamagata High Negative: InfB 100%, YAM 99.0% (95/96) agreement. (Lower agreement for low concentration B/Victoria VIC primer/probe set noted, but average Ct was near assay cutoff).
    Clinical PerformanceProspective Study (Positive & Negative Agreement with sequencing)Invitrogen SuperScript™:     VIC: Positive Agreement 100.0% (range 92.1-100.0% CI); Negative Agreement 99.9-100.0%.     YAM: Positive Agreement 100.0% (range 83.1-100.0% CI); Negative Agreement 100.0%. Quanta qScript™:     VIC: Positive Agreement 91.7-100.0% (range 64.6-100.0% CI); Negative Agreement 99.6-100.0%.     YAM: Positive Agreement 100.0% (range 34.2-100.0% CI); Negative Agreement 100.0%.
    Retrospective Study (Positive Agreement with sequencing)Invitrogen SuperScript™:     VIC: Positive Agreement 100.0% (range 20.7-100.0% CI for specific specimen types). Quanta qScript™:     YAM: Positive Agreement 96.6% (range 83.0-99.4% CI for NPS/NS).

    2. Sample Size and Data Provenance

    Test Set for Clinical Performance:

    • Prospective Study:
      • Sample Size: 1,002 respiratory specimens initially collected. After exclusions (unknown specimen type, lower respiratory specimen, inconclusive results, technician error), 992 specimens for Invitrogen SuperScript™ analysis and 861 for Quanta qScript™ analysis were used.
      • Data Provenance: Respiratory specimens from patients presenting with influenza-like illness (ILI) from 6 clinical sites in the United States during the 2011-2012 influenza season. This was a prospective collection.
    • Retrospective Study:
      • Sample Size: 51 additional specimens initially identified as influenza B positive. The exact breakdown per enzyme kit and lineage is not explicitly stated in combined totals, but tables show 15 samples for VIC (Invitrogen), 32 samples for YAM (Invitrogen), 14 samples for VIC (Quanta), and 29 samples for YAM (Quanta) used in relevant tables.
      • Data Provenance: Routine influenza surveillance samples collected between September 2012 and January 2013 in the United States. These were retrospective samples.

    3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth Establishment

    The document does not specify the number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the clinical test set. However, the ground truth was established by:

    • Bi-directional nucleic acid sequence analysis of a region of the influenza B hemagglutinin (HA) gene on each specimen containing influenza B viral RNA.
    • Alignment of sequence data of each sample to B/Victoria and B/Yamagata reference virus sequences of the HA gene.
    • Percent homology calculation: A homology exceeding 95% to one lineage reference sequence while showing less than 95% to the other lineage reference sequence confirmed the identification.
    • The overall context of the submission indicates this process was conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), implying highly qualified molecular biologists and virologists were involved in this reference sequencing and analysis.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    The document describes the ground truth for the clinical test set being established directly by bi-directional nucleic acid sequence analysis and comparison to reference sequences.

    • There is no explicit mention of an adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1) involving human experts for the interpretation of the sequencing results. The sequencing analysis itself serves as the objective "adjudication" against established phylogenetic criteria (95% homology).

    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

    There was no Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study done comparing human readers with AI assistance versus without AI assistance. This device is an in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) assay (RT-PCR panel), not an imaging-based AI system that would typically involve human readers.

    6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance)

    Yes, a standalone (algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) evaluation was performed. The device's performance, as reported in the analytical and clinical studies, represents the direct output of the RT-PCR assay interpreted according to its defined cutoff values, without any explicit human intervention to "interpret" or adjust the device's determination of influenza B lineage. The comparative method for the clinical study (sequencing) also represents a standalone, objective reference standard.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth used for both the prospective and retrospective clinical studies was nucleic acid sequencing (bi-directional sequence analysis of the influenza B hemagglutinin (HA) gene), which is a definitive molecular method for viral lineage determination. The results were confirmed by calculating percent homology to established B/Victoria and B/Yamagata reference virus sequences.

    8. Sample Size for the Training Set

    The document does not explicitly mention a "training set" in the context of machine learning or AI models. This device is a RT-PCR assay based on pre-designed oligonucleotide primers and probes. Therefore, the concept of a training set for an algorithm is not directly applicable.

    Instead, the design of the primers and probes would have been informed by:

    • Historical knowledge of influenza B virus genetics: "An alignment of the full length HA sequences from many viruses from both lineages was used to locate a variable region flanked by two conserved regions that could be used to discriminate viruses from the two different lineages." This implies a large dataset of influenza B sequences was used in the initial design and selection of targets for the primers and probes.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    As noted above, a formal "training set" with ground truth in the AI/ML sense is not described. The "ground truth" equivalent for the design phase of this molecular assay would have been established through extensive phylogenetic analysis and sequence comparison of known influenza B virus strains to identify conserved and variable regions suitable for differential detection. This foundational work would precede the actual development and validation of the RT-PCR panel. The reference viruses B/Yamagata/16/88 and B/Victorial2/87 are explicitly mentioned as representing the two distinct lineages, indicating their role as foundational "ground truth" for lineage classification during assay design.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1