Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K130610
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2013-08-30

    (176 days)

    Regulation Number
    888.3350
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Indications For Use:

      1. Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis.
      1. Rheumatoid arthritis.
      1. Correction of functional deformity.
      1. Treatment of non-union, femoral neck fracture, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable by other techniques.
      1. Revision procedures where other treatment or devices have failed.

    The Sirius Femoral Hip Stem is intended for cemented use only and may be used in partial and total hip arthroplasties.

    Device Description

    The Sirius femoral stem is a highly polished, double-tapered, cemented stem designed to reduce hip pain for patients and restore ioint biomechanics and stability. The short stem is designed to fit a broad range of patient anatomies for primary or revision cases. The features include a collarless, highly polished, doubletaper design, with a rectangular proximal geometry. The distal portion of the stem has a progressive diminishing cross-section. Each stem is packed with a winged and wingless centralizer, made of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), designed to help create a uniform mantle.. The size ranges are within the ranges of legally marketed predicates. The Sirius stem is made from Co-Cr-Mo, ASTM F799.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document describes the Biomet Manufacturing Corp.'s Sirius Femoral Hip Stem, a medical device, and the non-clinical testing performed to establish its substantial equivalence to predicate devices. No clinical testing was conducted.

    Here's the breakdown of the requested information:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The acceptance criteria for the Sirius Femoral Hip Stem are implied by its demonstration of "substantial equivalence" to legally marketed predicate devices through non-clinical testing. The performance demonstrated that the device is "as safe, as effective, and performs as well as or better than the predicate devices."

    Acceptance Criteria (Implied from Substantial Equivalence to Predicates)Reported Device Performance (as demonstrated by non-clinical testing)
    Mechanical and physiological performance consistent with predicate devices for:
    Distal Stem fatigue strengthMet or exceeded
    Proximal Stem fatigue strengthMet or exceeded
    Cobalt Chrome Modular Head Pull-off from a Type 1 Reduced Taper strengthMet or exceeded
    Range of MotionConsistent with
    Comparison/Justification for Modular ConnectionsMet or exceeded
    Fretting and Corrosion resistanceMet or exceeded
    Material composition (Co-Cr-Mo, ASTM F799)Confirmed to be Co-Cr-Mo, ASTM F799
    Centralizer material (Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA))Confirmed to be PMMA
    Taper-slip principle effectivenessDemonstrated to be effective
    Rotational stabilityDemonstrated to be effective

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    This information is not provided in the document. The document refers to "nonclinical performance testing of the worst-case stem" and standardized tests (ISO 7206-4:2010, ASTM F2068-09, ISO 7206-6:1992, ISO 7206-10:2003, ISO 21535:2009) but does not specify the number of samples or data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective) for these non-clinical tests.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    This information is not applicable as the study described is non-clinical (mechanical testing) and does not involve human expert evaluation for establishing ground truth in a clinical context.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not applicable as the study described is non-clinical and does not involve human adjudication.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, and the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    This information is not applicable. The document describes a medical device (femoral hip stem) and its non-clinical testing for substantial equivalence, not an AI or imaging-based device requiring human reader studies.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    This information is not applicable as the device is a physical medical implant, not a software algorithm.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The "ground truth" for the non-clinical testing was established by international and industry standards and guidance documents (e.g., ISO 7206 series, ASTM F2068-09, "Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Non-clinical Information for Femoral Stem Prostheses"). The performance of the Sirius Femoral Hip Stem was compared against the requirements and performance characteristics outlined in these standards and the known performance of predicate devices.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    This information is not applicable. The device is a physical implant, not a learning algorithm that requires a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    This information is not applicable for the reasons stated in point 8.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1