LogoFDA 510(k) Search
Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K123211
    Device Name
    A5 ANESTHESIA DELIVERY SYSTEM
    Manufacturer
    DATASCOPE CORP., PATIENT MONITORING DIVISION
    Date Cleared
    2013-02-14

    (125 days)

    Product Code
    BSZ,CBQ,CBR,CBS,CCK,CCL,NHO,NHP,NHQ
    Regulation Number
    868.5160
    Type
    Abbreviated
    Panel
    Anesthesiology
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    K102471,K092449
    Predicate For
    K131790,K142552,K171311
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The A5 Anesthesia Delivery System is a device used to administer to a patient, continuously or intermittently, a general inhalation anesthetic and to maintain a patient's ventilation. The A5 is intended for use by licensed clinicians, for patients requiring anesthesia within a health care facility, and can be used in adult and pediatric populations.

    Device Description

    The A5 Anesthesia Delivery System is a device used to administer to a patient, continuously or intermittently, a general inhalation anesthetic and to maintain a patient's ventilation.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the A5 Anesthesia Delivery System and its substantial equivalence to predicate devices, but it does not contain specific acceptance criteria or a study detailing device performance against such criteria in the manner requested.

    The document indicates:

    • Summary of Performance Testing: "The A5 has been tested and found to be in compliance with recognized safety, performance and electromagnetic compatibility standards." It then lists numerous IEC, ISO, CGA, and ASTM standards.
    • User Evaluation: "The A5 has been evaluated by end-users and found to meets performed within its intended use and met their specific needs."

    However, it does not provide:

    • A table of specific acceptance criteria (e.g., accuracy +/- X%, sensitivity, specificity) with reported device performance metrics against those criteria.
    • Details on sample sizes for test sets, data provenance, number or qualifications of experts, or adjudication methods for establishing ground truth.
    • Information about multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness studies or standalone algorithm performance.
    • Sample size or specific ground truth establishment methods for a training set.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request to provide a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance, nor details about a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria, because this information is not present in the provided text. The document focuses on regulatory compliance through adherence to standards and user evaluations rather than detailed performance metrics.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1