Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K122178
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2012-10-11

    (80 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.5100
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Flash-C PTCA Balloon Dilatation Catheter is indicated for balloon dilatation of the stenotic portion of a coronary artery or bypass graft for the purpose of improving myocardial perfusion. The Flash-C PTCA Balloon Dilatation Catheter is also indicated for the post delivery expansion of balloon expandable stents within the coronary vasculature.

    Device Description

    The Flash-C PTCA Balloon Dilatation Catheter is a .014" guidewire-compatible, rapid exchange (RX) angioplasty balloon catheter with proximal anchoring and a working length of 135cm. The Flash-C PTCA Balloon Dilatation Catheter uses a dual balloon design that features a compliant anchoring balloon, which prevents distal migration of the balloon during angioplasty. The second semi-compliant higherpressure balloon allows for luminal dilatation of de novo lesions and post deployment stent expansion.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the "Flash-C PTCA Balloon Dilatation Catheter" and does not contain information about a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria.

    The document details the device's intended use, its substantial equivalence to predicate devices, and the performance data refers to a list of in-vitro bench testing and biocompatibility testing. These tests are used to confirm the performance characteristics as compared to the predicate device and meet established specifications, rather than proving achievement of specific clinical acceptance criteria in a study.

    Therefore, many of the requested categories for a study proving acceptance criteria cannot be extracted from the provided text, as this type of clinical study was not described.

    Here's a breakdown of what can be extracted or inferred based on the context of a 510(k) submission for this type of device:


    1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

    The document broadly states: "All test results demonstrate that the device materials, the manufacturing process, and the design for the Flash-C PTCA Balloon Dilatation Catheter met the established specifications necessary for consistent performance according to its intended use." And "The Flash-C PTCA Balloon Dilatation Catheter met all predetermined acceptance criteria of design verification and validation as specified by applicable standards, test protocols, and/or customer inputs."

    However, specific quantitative acceptance criteria and their corresponding reported device performance values are NOT provided in the text. The document only lists the types of tests performed.

    Acceptance Criterion (Test Type)Reported Device Performance
    Biocompatibility Testing:"Non-toxic and non-sensitizing to biological tissues consistent with its intended use." (Specific quantitative results not provided)
    ISO MEM Elution AssayMet established specifications
    ASTM Hemolysis AssayMet established specifications
    Complement Activation C3a and SC5b-9 AssayMet established specifications
    Thromboresistance EvaluationMet established specifications
    Materials Mediated Rabbit PyrogenMet established specifications
    ISO Guinea Pig Maximization SensitizationMet established specifications
    ISO Acute Systemic Injection TestMet established specifications
    ISO Intracutaneous Reactivity TestMet established specifications
    Pyrogen (LAL) ChromogenicMet established specifications
    In-vitro Performance Bench Testing:"Confirmed the performance characteristics as compared to the predicate device." (Specific quantitative results not provided)
    Balloon Crossing ProfileMet established specifications
    Catheter Shaft DiameterMet established specifications
    Catheter Working LengthMet established specifications
    Catheter Inner DiameterMet established specifications
    Angioplasty Balloon Rated Burst PressureMet established specifications
    Anchoring Balloon Burst VolumeMet established specifications
    Angioplasty Balloon ComplianceMet established specifications
    Balloon Inflation TimeMet established specifications
    Balloon Deflation TimeMet established specifications
    Angioplasty Balloon Rated Burst Pressure (in Stent)Met established specifications
    Anchoring Balloon Burst Volume (in Stent)Met established specifications
    Angioplasty Balloon FatigueMet established specifications
    Anchoring Balloon FatigueMet established specifications
    Catheter Bond StrengthMet established specifications
    Catheter Tip Pull StrengthMet established specifications
    Catheter Torque StrengthMet established specifications
    Simulated UseMet established specifications
    Flexibility and Kink ResistanceMet established specifications
    RadiopacityMet established specifications
    Angioplasty Balloon Fatigue (in Stent)Met established specifications
    Anchoring Balloon Fatigue (in Stent)Met established specifications

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

    • Sample Size: Not specified for any of the in-vitro or biocompatibility tests.
    • Data Provenance: Not specified. These are laboratory bench tests and in-vitro biocompatibility tests, not clinical data from patients.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

    • This information is not applicable as the "test set" described consists of in-vitro and biocompatibility testing, not human-read clinical data requiring expert ground truth establishment.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set:

    • Not applicable for the described in-vitro and biocompatibility testing.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

    • No MRMC study was done. This device is a PTCA Balloon Dilatation Catheter (a physical medical device, not an AI or imaging diagnostic tool). The provided text does not mention any AI component or human reader interpretation studies.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

    • Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not an algorithm.

    7. The type of ground truth used:

    • Not applicable in the sense of expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data for clinical performance. The 'ground truth' for the in-vitro and biocompatibility tests would be the established engineering specifications and biological safety standards, respectively.

    8. The sample size for the training set:

    • Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not an AI model requiring a training set.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

    • Not applicable.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1