Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K121764
    Date Cleared
    2012-08-21

    (67 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3070
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The CD HORIZON® Spinal System with or without SEXTANT® instrumentation is intended for posterior, non-cervical fixation as an adjunct to fusion for the following indications: degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies); spondylolisthesis; trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation); spinal stenosis; curvatures (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis and/or lordosis); tumor; pseudarthrosis; and/or failed previous fusion.

    Except for hooks, when used as an anterolateral thoracic/lumbar system, the CD HORIZON® Spinal System may also be used for the same indications as an adjunct to fusion.

    With the exception of degenerative disc disease, the CD HORIZON® LEGACY™ 3.5mm rods and the CD HORIZON® Spinal System PEEK rods and associated components may be used for the aforementioned indications in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion. The 3.5mm rods may be used for the specific pediatric indications noted below.

    When used for posterior non-cervical pedicle screw fixation in pediatric patients, the CD HORIZON® Spinal System implants are indicated as an adjunct to fusion to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Additionally, the CD HORIZON® Spinal System is intended to treat pediatric patients diagnosed with the following conditions: spondylolisthesis/spondylolysis and fracture caused by turnor and/or traunta. These devices are to be used with autograft and/or allograft. Pedicle screw fixation is limited to a posterior approach.

    The CD HORIZON SPIRE™ Plate is a posterior, single level, non-pedicle supplemental fixation device intended for use in the non-cervical spine (T1-S1) as an adjunct to fusion in skeletally mature patients. It is intended for plate fixation/attachment to spinous processes for the purpose of achieving supplemental fixation in the following conditions: degenerative disc disease (as previously defined); spondylolisthesis, trauma; and/or tumor.

    In order to achieve additional levels of fixation, the CD HORIZON® Spinal System rods may be connected to the VERTEX® Reconstruction System with the VERTEX® rod connector. Refer to the VERTEX® Reconstruction System Package Insert for a list of the VERTEX® indications of use.

    Device Description

    The CD HORIZON® Spinal System consists of a variety of shapes and sizes of rods, hooks, screws, CROSSLINK® Plates, staples and connecting components, as well as implant components from other Medtronic spinal systems, which can be rigidly locked into a variety of configurations, with each construct being tailor-made for the individual case.

    A subset of CD HORIZON® Spinal System components may be used for posterior pedicle screw fixation in pediatric cases. These constructs may be comprised of a variety of shapes and sizes of rods (ranging in diameter from 3.5mm to 6.35mm), hooks, screws, CROSSLINK® Plates, and connecting components. Similarly to the CD HORIZON® implants used in adult cases, these components can be rigidly locked into a variety of configurations, with each construct being tailor-made for the individual case.

    Certain components within the CD HORIZON® Spinal System are specifically excluded for use in pediatric patients. These include PEEK rods, Shape Memory Alloy Staples, SPIRE™ Plates and DYNALOK® bolts. All screws used in pediatric cases are only cleared for use via a posterior approach. All of the components used in pediatric cases are fabricated from medical grade stainless steel, medical grade titanium, titanium alloy, and medical grade cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy.

    Certain implant components from other Medtronic spinal systems can be used with the CD HORIZON® Spinal System in non-pediatric cases. These components include TSRH® rods, hooks, screws, plates, CROSSLINK® plates, connectors, staples, washers, GDLH® rods, hooks, connectors and CROSSLINK® bar and connectors; LIBERTY® rods and screws; DYNALOK® PLUS and DYNALOK CLASSIC® bolts along with rod/bolt connectors; and Medtronic Multi-Axial rods and screws. Please note that certain components are specifically designed to connect to specific rod diameters, while other components can connect to multiple rod diameters. Care should be taken so that the correct components are used in the spinal construct.

    CD HORIZON® hooks are intended for posterior use only. CD HORIZON® staples and CD HORIZON® ECLIPSE® rods and associated screws are intended for anterior use only. However, for patients of smaller stature and pediatric patients, CD HORIZON® 4:5mm rods and associated components may be used posteriorly.

    The CD HORIZON® Spinal System implant components are fabricated from miedical grade stainless steel, medical grade titanium, titanium alloy, medical grade cobaltchromium-molybdenum alloy, or medical grade PEEK OPTIMA-LT1. Certain CD HORIZON® Spinal System components may be coated with hydroxyapatite. No warranties expressed or implied are made. Implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose or use are specifically excluded. See the MDT Catalog for further information about warranties and limitations of liability.

    Never use stainless steel and titanium implant components in the same construct.

    Medical grade titanium, titanium alloy, and/or medical grade cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy may be used together. Never use titanium, titanium alloy, and/or medical grade cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy with stainless steel in the same construct.

    The CD HORIZON® Spinal System also includes anterior staples made of Shape Memory Alloy (Nitinol - NiTi). Shape Memory Alloy is compatible with titanium, titanium alloy, and cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy. Do not use with stainless steel. These staples are not to be used in pediatric patients.

    PEEK OPTIMA-LT1 implants may be used with stainless steel, titanium, or cobaltchromium-molybdenum alloy implants. CD HORIZON® PEEK Rods are not to be used with CROSSLINK® Plates or in pediatric patients.

    The purpose of this 510(k) submission is to include additional sizes of in-line connectors to the CD HORIZON® Spinal System.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's a summary of the acceptance criteria and study information for the CD HORIZON® Spinal System based on the provided 510(k) summary, structured to answer your specific questions:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Device Performance
    Mechanical Performance: - Static Axial Compression Bending Strength - Dynamic Axial Compression Bending Fatigue StrengthThe subject in-line connectors met or exceeded the performance of the predicate devices as per ASTM F1717-11a and ASTM F1798-97 standards, demonstrating equivalent safety and effectiveness.
    Material Compatibility:Subject components are compatible with existing CD HORIZON® Spinal System components and specified materials (titanium, titanium alloy, cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy, PEEK OPTIMA-LT1).
    Biocompatibility:Not explicitly detailed, but implied to be equivalent to predicate devices which have established biocompatibility.
    Functional Equivalence:The subject in-line connectors are identical to the predicate in terms of indications for use, intended use, and performance specifications. Key differences are additional lengths and overall design profile.

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Sample Size: Not explicitly stated in terms of a "test set" for a clinical study. The evaluation was primarily non-clinical, comparing the new in-line connectors to predicate devices. The number of in-line connectors tested is not specified, but the testing would have involved a sufficient number to meet the requirements of the ASTM standards.
    • Data Provenance: The data is non-clinical bench testing data, conducted in a laboratory environment, not derived from human subjects or retrospective/prospective studies. The country of origin of the test data is not specified but is implicitly associated with Medtronic's R&D and testing facilities.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Experts

    • Not applicable. This submission did not involve clinical testing or human reader assessments where expert ground truth would be established. The "ground truth" for this device's performance was established through recognized industry standards (ASTM F1717-11a and ASTM F1798-97) for mechanical testing.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    • Not applicable. As there was no clinical study or human reader assessment, no adjudication method was used. The compliance was determined by meeting the specified mechanical testing standards.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and Effect Size of Human Reader Improvement with/without AI Assistance

    • No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This 510(k) submission is for an orthopedic implant (spinal system components), not an AI-powered diagnostic device. Therefore, the concept of human reader improvement with AI assistance is not relevant to this submission.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    • Not applicable. This submission is for a physical medical device (spinal system components), not an algorithm or software. Therefore, standalone performance of an algorithm is not relevant.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    • The ground truth used to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the new in-line connectors was compliance with recognized biomechanical testing standards (ASTM F1717-11a and ASTM F1798-97). This involved comparing the new devices against the established performance of legally marketed predicate devices.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    • Not applicable. There was no "training set" in the context of an algorithm or AI model development. The data used for this submission was for testing the physical device.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    • Not applicable. As no training set was involved, no ground truth needed to be established for it.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1