Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K102998
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2011-01-04

    (88 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3030
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Acumed Congruent Bone Plate System provides fixation for fractures, fusions, or osteotomies for the clavicle, humerus, radius, ulna, metacarpal, metatarsal, malleolus, tibia, and fibula.

    Device Description

    The predicate Congruent Bone Plate System (K012655) consists of bone plates and screws which provide fixation for fractures, fusions, and osteotomies of the clavicle, humerus, radius, ulna, metacarpal, metatarsal, malleolus, tibia, and fibula. The purpose of this 510(k) is to modify two components of the Congruent Bone Plate System and to add one component to this predicate system. These modifications are intended to allow the operating surgeon to better accommodate various patient anatomies when treating distal and midshaft fractures of the radius. All components are made of titanium alloy conforming to ASTM F136.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a 510(k) summary for the Acumed Congruent Bone Plate System. This is a medical device for bone fixation, and the summary details its indications for use, device description, and preclinical testing.

    However, the information required to answer the specific questions about "acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" is not present in the provided text. The document refers to preclinical testing (static and dynamic 4-point bend testing in accordance with ASTM F382) to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device. This type of testing evaluates the mechanical properties of the device, not its "performance" in the context of diagnostic accuracy, human reader improvement, or ground truth establishment, which are typical metrics for AI/ML-based medical devices or diagnostic tools.

    Therefore, I cannot provide a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance, nor can I answer the specific questions related to sample sizes, data provenance, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or ground truth establishment, as these concepts are not applicable to the type of device and testing described in this 510(k) summary.

    In summary, the provided document does not contain the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and studies related to diagnostic/AI performance.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1