Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(65 days)
Powdered vinyl patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.
powdered vinyl patient examination gloves, Clear(non-colored) that meets all of the requirements of ASTM standard D 5250-06.
Here's an analysis of the provided text, outlining the acceptance criteria and study details for the Shijiazhuang Star Plastic Powdered Vinyl Patient Examination Gloves:
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance
| Characteristics | Acceptance Criteria (Standard) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Dimension | ASTM standard D 5250-06 | Meets |
| Physical Properties | ASTM standard D 5250-06 | Meets |
| Freedom from pinholes | 21 CFR 800.20 | Meets |
| Powder Amount | ASTM standard D 5250-06 | < 10mg/dm²Meets |
| Biocompatibility | Primary Skin Irritation in rabbits | Passes (Not a Primary Skin Irritation) |
| Dermal sensitization in the guinea pig | Passes (Not a Dermal sensitization) |
Study Information
-
Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not explicitly stated for specific tests (Dimension, Physical Properties, Freedom from pinholes, Powder Amount). For Biocompatibility, it mentions "rabbits" and "guinea pig" as test subjects, implying a small animal study; specific numbers are not given. The studies are non-clinical, meaning they were conducted in a lab setting, not with human subjects. Data provenance is not specified beyond being part of the manufacturer's evaluation.
-
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. The ground truth for these device performance tests (e.g., dimensions, physical properties, pinholes) is established by adherence to recognized ASTM standards and FDA regulations, not by expert consensus on individual cases. For biocompatibility, the ground truth is determined by standard toxicological testing protocols, not expert consensus in the human sense.
-
Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable for these types of objective device performance tests that rely on adherence to established standards and measurement protocols.
-
If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This device is a patient examination glove, not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive medical imaging device.
-
If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not an algorithm.
-
The type of ground truth used:
- For Dimension, Physical Properties, and Powder Amount: Adherence to ASTM standard D 5250-06.
- For Freedom from pinholes: Adherence to 21 CFR 800.20.
- For Biocompatibility: Results from standard animal primary skin irritation and dermal sensitization tests (likely following ISO10993-10 guidelines, as referenced).
-
The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This device is a physical product, not a machine learning model that requires a training set. The performance is based on manufacturing processes and material science, validated against established standards.
-
How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable, as there is no training set for a physical device. The "ground truth" for manufacturing is the adherence to design specifications and quality control procedures that ensure the product meets the cited standards.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1