Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K100889
    Device Name
    ENDOSKELETON TC
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2010-07-29

    (120 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3080
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Endoskeleton® TC is indicated for use for anterior cervical interbody fusion in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine at one disc level from C-3 to C-7. DDD is defined as discogenic pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. Patients should have received 6 weeks of non-operative treatment prior to treatment with the device. The Endoskeleton® TC is indicated to be used with supplemental fixation and autograft bone.

    Device Description

    The Endoskeleton® TC is a cervical intervertebral body fusion device. The system is comprised of a variety of implant sizes to accommodate various patient anatomy and pathology. All implantable components are manufactured from medical grade titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V-ELI). The center of the implant is hollow and is to be filled with autograft material. The design incorporates "windows" through the implant to permit visualization of the graft material and, over time, formation of new bone.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) summary for the Endoskeleton® TC intervertebral body fusion device. It describes the device, its intended use, and the non-clinical testing performed to establish substantial equivalence to predicate devices. Crucially, this document does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets those criteria in the context of an AI/ML device.

    The provided text describes a traditional medical device (an implantable fusion device) and its regulatory clearance process, which relies on demonstrating substantial equivalence to already marketed predicate devices through mechanical testing. It does not mention any AI/ML components, software, or algorithms. Therefore, it's impossible to extract the requested information regarding AI/ML device performance, ground truth, expert consensus, or comparative effectiveness studies from this document.

    Based on the provided text, I cannot complete the requested tables and descriptions because the document pertains to a physical medical device (an intervertebral body fusion device) and does not describe an AI/ML powered device or a study involving such a device.

    The summary focuses on:

    • Device Description: A titanium intervertebral body fusion device.
    • Intended Use: Anterior cervical interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease.
    • Predicate Devices: Other legally marketed interbody devices.
    • Non-Clinical Testing: Mechanical tests like axial compression, shear, torsion, subsidence, and expulsion, all performed in vitro (e.g., in a lab setting, not on patient data or with AI).
    • Substantial Equivalence: A regulatory pathway showing the new device is as safe and effective as existing ones, primarily based on design, materials, and mechanical performance.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1