Search Results

The Amsco Evolution Series Steam Sterilizer Models HC-2000 and HC-3000 are designed for sterilization of heat and moisture-stable materials used in healthcare facilities and are available in two configurations:

• Prevacuum is equipped with Prevacuum, Gravity, Liquid, Leak Test and DART (Bowie-Dick) cycles.
• Steam Flush Pressure-Pulse (SFPP) is equipped with SFPP, Prevacuum, Gravity, Liquid, Leak Test and DART (Bowie-Dick) cycles.

The Amsco Evolution Series Steam Sterilizer, Models HC-2000 and HC-3000, are designed for sterilization of heat and moisture-stable materials used in healthcare facilities and are available in two configurations:

• Prevacuum is equipped with Prevacuum, Gravity, Liquid, Leak Test and . DART (Bowie-Dick) cycles.
• . Steam Flush Pressure-Pulse (SFPP) - is equipped with SFPP, Prevacuum, Gravity, Liquid, Leak Test and DART (Bowie-Dick) cycles.
  The chamber sizes of the proposed Amsco Evolution Series Steam Sterilizer Models are as follows:
• 26" x 61" x 49" (Model HC-2000) .
• 26" x 61" x 72" (Model HC-3000) .

Here's an analysis of the provided text, focusing on acceptance criteria, study details, and related information for the STERIS Amsco Evolution Series Steam Sterilizer Models HC-2000 and HC-3000.

Important Note: This document describes a steam sterilizer, which is a medical device designed to sterilize other medical materials. The "device" in this context is the sterilizer itself, not an AI algorithm. Therefore, many standard AI/ML study components like a "test set" for performance evaluation, "ground truth" established by experts, "adjudication methods," "MRMC studies," or "standalone (algorithm only)" performance metrics are not directly applicable in the same way they would be for an AI diagnostic device. The "acceptance criteria" here relate to the sterilizer's ability to achieve and maintain sterility, as defined by established standards.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The acceptance criteria are derived from ANSI/AAMI ST8, Fifth Edition, December 2008, a recognized standard for steam sterilization.

• Sterility Assurance Level: At least 10⁻⁶
• F₀ value: At least 12
• Moisture Retention: Less than 3% increase in presterilization test pack weight
• Wet Spots: No evidence of wet spots (Section 5.5.2 and 5.5.2.1 of ANSI/AAMI-ST8) | Achieved a sterility assurance level of at least 10⁻⁶ through an F₀ value of at least 12, moisture retention of less than 3% increase in presterilization test pack weight, and no evidence of wet spots. |
  | SFPP Cycles (Wrapped Instrument Process Challenge Device):
• Sterility Assurance Level: At least 10⁻⁶ (using half-cycle analysis)
• Moisture Retention: Less than 20% increase in presterilization weight of the towel
• Wet Spots: No evidence of wet spots on outer wrapper (Section 5.5.4 and 5.5.4.1 of ANSI/AAMI-ST8) | Achieved a sterility assurance level of at least 10⁻⁶ using half-cycle cycle analysis, moisture retention of less than 20% increase in presterilization weight of the towel, and no evidence of wet spots on the outer wrapper. |
  | Gravity Cycles (Fabric Process Challenge Device):
• Sterility Assurance Level: At least 10⁻⁶
• F₀ value: At least 12
• Moisture Retention: Less than 3% increase in presterilization test pack weight
• Wet Spots: No evidence of wet spots (Section 5.5.2 and 5.5.2.1 of ANSI/AAMI-ST8) | Achieved a sterility assurance level of at least 10⁻⁶ through an F₀ value of at least 12, moisture retention of less than 3% increase in presterilization test pack weight, and no evidence of wet spots. |
  | Gravity Cycles (Wrapped Instrument Process Challenge Device):
• Sterility Assurance Level: At least 10⁻⁶ (using half-cycle analysis)
• Moisture Retention: Less than 20% increase in presterilization weight of the towel
• Wet Spots: No evidence of wet spots on outer wrapper (Section 5.5.4.1 of ANSI/AAMI-ST8) | Achieved a sterility assurance level of at least 10⁻⁶ using half-cycle cycle analysis, moisture retention of less than 20% increase in presterilization weight of the towel, and no evidence of wet spots on the outer wrapper. |
  | Prevac Cycles (Fabric Process Challenge Device):
• Sterility Assurance Level: At least 10⁻⁶
• F₀ value: At least 12
• Moisture Retention: Less than 3% increase in presterilization test pack weight
• Wet Spots: No evidence of wet spots (Section 5.5.2 and 5.5.2.1 of ANSI/AAMI-ST8) | Achieved a sterility assurance level of at least 10⁻⁶ through an F₀ value of at least 12, moisture retention of less than 3% increase in presterilization test pack weight, and exhibited no wet spots. |
  | Prevac Cycles (Wrapped Instrument Process Challenge Device):
• Sterility Assurance Level: At least 10⁻⁶ (using half-cycle analysis)
• Moisture Retention: Less than 20% increase in presterilization weight of the towel
• Wet Spots: No evidence of wet spots on outer wrapper (Section 5.5.4 and 5.5.4.1 of ANSI/AAMI-ST8) | Achieved a sterility assurance level of at least 10⁻⁶ using half-cycle analysis, moisture retention of less than 20% increase in presterilization weight of the towel, and no evidence of wet spots on the outer wrapper. |
  | Liquid Cycles (Three 1,000 ml flasks):
• Sterility Assurance Level: At least 10⁻⁶
• F₀ value: At least 12
• Water Loss: Not exceeding 50 ml
• Flask Closure: Automatic sealing (Section 5.5.3 and 5.5.3.1 of ANSI/AAMI-ST8) | Achieved a sterility assurance level of at least 10⁻⁶ through an F₀ value of at least 12, water loss not exceeding 50 ml, and automatic sealing of the flask closure. |
  | DART Cycle: Uniform color change throughout the test sheet (Section 5.6.1 and 5.6.1.1 of ANSI/AAMI-ST8) | Demonstrated a uniform color change throughout the test sheet using the Bowie-Dick Test Pack. |
  | Software Validation: Compliance with FDA's moderate level of concern recommendations. | Software validation for cycle operation was performed according to FDA's "Guidance for the Content for Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices (05/11/05)." (Successfully implying compliance). |

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size for Test Set: The document does not explicitly state a numerical sample size for the "test set" in terms of number of sterilization runs or items processed. Instead, it refers to validation studies performed "for the Prevac, Gravity, Liquid and SFPP cycles" using specific "process challenge devices" and "fabric process challenge devices." These devices are designed to represent challenging sterilization scenarios, and their successful sterilization across multiple runs (though not quantified) constitutes the "sample."
• Data Provenance: The studies were internal validation studies conducted by STERIS Corporation. The data provenance is therefore internal (presumably USA, where STERIS is based), and prospective in nature, as they were specifically carried out to validate the new sterilizer models.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

Given this is a steam sterilizer, the "ground truth" and "expert" involvement is different from an AI diagnostic device.

• Number of Experts: Not explicitly stated in terms of individual expert count. The "ground truth" is established by adherence to and measurement against the performance requirements set forth in the recognized industry standard ANSI/AAMI ST8, Fifth Edition, December 2008. This standard itself represents a consensus of experts in sterilization science and medical device safety. STERIS's internal team, performing the validation, are implied to be experts in sterilization validation.
• Qualifications of Experts: The qualifications are implicit in the adherence to the ANSI/AAMI ST8 standard and the conduct of the validation studies by a medical device manufacturer (STERIS Corporation), which would employ engineers and scientists with expertise in sterilization.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

Not applicable in the context of a steam sterilizer validation against a standard. The "adjudication" is essentially the direct measurement and verification against the physical and biological criteria outlined in the ANSI/AAMI ST8 standard (e.g., spore kill, F₀ value, moisture retention, color change). There is no "consensus" of individual human adjudicators here; it's an objective measurement against established metrics.

5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This device is a steam sterilizer, not an AI diagnostic device that assists human readers.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This concept is not directly applicable to a steam sterilizer. The sterilizer operates autonomously through its programmed cycles. The "standalone performance" is implicitly demonstrated through the validation studies discussed, where the sterilizer performs its function (sterilization) without direct human intervention during the cycle itself, but under conditions specified by human operators and validated against established standards.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

The ground truth used is primarily biological indicators (complete kill of spores) and physical performance metrics defined by an industry standard.

• Sterility Assurance Level (SAL): Defined as a probability of survival of at least 10⁻⁶ (meaning one in a million chance of a surviving microorganism). This is the key biological "ground truth."
• F₀ Value: A measure of the cumulative lethality of the sterilization process, with a minimum required F₀ of 12.
• Moisture Retention / Wet Spots: Physical criteria to ensure dry products.
• Uniform Color Change: For the DART (Bowie-Dick) test, indicating proper air removal and steam penetration.
• Water Loss / Flask Sealing: For liquid cycles.

These are objective, measurable outcomes as defined by ANSI/AAMI ST8.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a "training set" in the conventional sense of machine learning. The sterilizer's operational parameters are designed and engineered, not "trained" on data.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

Not applicable, as there is no "training set" for an AI/ML model for this device. The "ground truth" for the sterilizer's design and operational parameters is established by decades of sterilization science, engineering principles, and the development of consensus standards like ANSI/AAMI ST8.

Ask a specific question about this device