Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K091705
    Device Name
    PRIMER PLUS
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2009-08-28

    (79 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3200
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Primer Plus is a universal restoration primer.

    The principle uses of the Primer Plus are:

      1. Indirect restorations (such as composite, endodontic posts, metal/metal alloys, porcelain, zirconia, alumina, ceramics, and hybrid ceramics)
      1. Intraoral repairs of fractured crowns and bridges (such as metals/metal alloys, porcelain, zirconia, alumina, ceramics, hybrid ceramics, or composite resin)
    Device Description

    The Primer Plus is a universal restoration primer.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is for a 510(k) summary for a dental product called "Primer Plus Universal Restoration Primer" by Bisco, Inc. This document does not contain information about the acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria in the context of an AI/ML medical device.

    The document is a regulatory submission for a dental material, not an AI/ML diagnostic or assistive device. Therefore, the concepts of "acceptance criteria," "test set," "ground truth," "MRMC study," "standalone performance," and "training set" as they relate to AI/ML device performance are not applicable to this submission.

    The document discusses:

    • Description of the Device: "Primer Plus is a universal restoration primer."
    • Intended Use: Indirect restorations and intraoral repairs of fractured crowns and bridges.
    • Substantial Equivalence: The device is being cleared based on its substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices (Clearfil Ceramic Primer (K061906) and One Step Plus (K011159)) in terms of intended use, indications for use, chemical composition, and physical properties.
    • Biocompatibility: An evaluation of biocompatibility was conducted to determine safety.

    In a traditional medical device 510(k) submission like this, "acceptance criteria" would refer to the performance benchmarks demonstrated by the predicate device that the new device must meet or exceed to prove substantial equivalence. The "study" mentioned would typically involve material property testing (e.g., bond strength, mechanical properties, biocompatibility) to show that the new device performs comparably to the predicates.

    However, none of the specific AI/ML-related questions you asked can be answered from this document.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1