Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K083505
    Date Cleared
    2008-12-12

    (16 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.1550
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The device is intended for use by a qualified physician for ultrasound evaluation of abdominal, cardiac, small parts (breast, testes, thyroid, etc.), peripheral vascular, fetal, transrectal, transvaginal, intraoperative (abdominal, thoracic, and vascular etc. ), pediatric, neonatal cephalic, musculoskeletal (general and superficial).

    Device Description

    The DC-3/DC-3T Diagnostic Ultrasound System is a general purpose, mobile, software controlled, ultrasound diagnostic system. Its function is to acquire and display ultrasound images in B-Mode, M-Mode, Color mode, PW mode, CW mode, Power mode, DirPower mode or the combined mode (i.e. B/M Mode). This system is a Track 3 device that employs an array of probes that include linear array, convex array and phased array with a frequency range of approximately 2.0 MHz to 12.0 MHz.

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but the provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for a diagnostic ultrasound system and its transducers. This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than detailed performance studies with acceptance criteria in the way a clinical study for a novel AI device would.

    Therefore, the input does not contain the information requested in your prompt regarding acceptance criteria, device performance tables, sample sizes for test sets, data provenance, number of experts, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, ground truth types, or training set details.

    The document states: "The conclusions drawn from testing of the DC-3/DC-3T Diagnostic Ultrasound System demonstrate that the device is as safe and effective as the legally marketed predicate devices." This is the general statement of meeting the "acceptance criteria" for a 510(k) submission, which is substantial equivalence. However, it does not provide specific performance metrics or study details typically associated with AI/ML device evaluations.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1