Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K071118
    Date Cleared
    2007-09-07

    (140 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    882.1320
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The cutaneous, surface cup electrode system is intended for use in the general recording and monitoring of the electroencephalography (EEG), evoked potential (EP) as well as ground and reference related to the EEG and EP recording.

    Device Description

    The cutaneous surface electrode (GCE, SCE, SCE, SCE' and CPES) are electrodes that are all applied to the surface of the patient's skin, they are non-invasive. These electrodes are used for the recording of electroencephalography (EEG), evoked potential (EP) as well as the ground and reference associated with the recording. They consist of a disc or cup made from a variety of materials, which include, gold, silver, conductive plastic, Ag-Ag/Cl, that have long been used for this intended purpose throughout the industry. The recording disc is permanently connected to a lead wire. This joint is then covered in a heat-shrink tube so as not to allow exposed lead wires and also to provide a strain relief. The lead wires are insulated with a Teflon insulation or equivalent. The lead wires are short and terminate in a small mass connector than conforms to DIN 42-802 for electrical safety. This small mass connector mates with a harness system as per K062880 (an Ives EEG Solutions 510K describing a Subdermal Wire Electrode System) which connects to the EEG recording instrument using molded "touch-proof" connectors which also conform to DIN 42-802.

    AI/ML Overview

    This 510(k) summary describes an EEG Surface Electrode System but does NOT contain information regarding acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets said criteria.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request to provide:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
    2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance
    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and their qualifications
    4. Adjudication method for the test set
    5. Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study details
    6. Standalone algorithm performance
    7. The type of ground truth used
    8. The sample size for the training set
    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    The document primarily focuses on the description of the device, its intended use, a comparison to predicate devices for substantial equivalence, and regulatory correspondence from the FDA. It does not provide any performance data or details of a scientific study as requested.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1