LogoFDA 510(k) Search
Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K062607
    Device Name
    POLYGRAFT BGS
    Manufacturer
    SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
    Date Cleared
    2007-11-09

    (430 days)

    Product Code
    MQV
    Regulation Number
    888.3045
    Type
    Traditional
    Panel
    Orthopedic
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    K030288
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The TRUREPAIR™ Bone Graft Substitute is to be used to fill bony voids or gaps caused by trauma or surgery that are not intrinsic to the stability of the bony structure. The TRUREPAIR™ Bone Graft Substitute is intended to be gently packed into bony voids or gaps of the skeletal system (i.e., the extremities, spine and pelvis). These defects may be surgically created osseous defects or osseous defects created from traumatic injury to the bone. The product provides a bone void filler that resorbs and is replaced with bone during the healing process.

    Device Description

    TRUREPAIR™ implants use the PolyGraft technology and are porous, resorbable scaffolds composed of polylactide-co-glycolide (PLG) copolymer and calcium sulfate. The copolymer is amorphous (noncrystalline) and resorbs in four to twelve months, depending on shape and location. The device also contains Polyglycolide (PGA) fibers and a surfactant.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the TRUREPAIR Bone Graft Substitute. It does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets specific performance criteria. Instead, it focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device (PolyGraft BGS) through comparison of intended use, materials, available shapes, sizes, packaging, shelf life, and sterilization.

    The summary states: "Performance testing conducted includes bench and animal studies that demonstrate substantial equivalence to the PolyGraft BGS." However, it does not provide details about these studies, such as their design, sample sizes, specific performance metrics, or results against any defined acceptance criteria.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance, nor can I provide information on sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or expert involvement, as these details are not present in the provided document.

    The document indicates that the device's substantial equivalence is based on its similarity to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than a direct study demonstrating its performance against specific acceptance criteria.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1