Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K053180
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2006-01-25

    (72 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3027
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Parallax® Acrylic Resin Cartridge with TRACERS is intended for the fixation of pathological fractures of the vertebral body using vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty procedures. Painful vertebral compression fractures may result from osteoporosis, benign lesions (hemangioma), and malignant lesions (metastatic cancers, myeloma).

    Device Description

    Parallax® Acrylic Resin Cartridge with TRACERS is an opacified polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) summary for a medical device (Parallax® Acrylic Resin Cartridge with TRACERS) and an FDA clearance letter. It is for a bone cement and describes its intended use and substantial equivalence to a predicate device.

    It does not contain any information about acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets specific acceptance criteria related to its performance characteristics (like strength, setting time, etc.). The document is focused on regulatory clearance based on substantial equivalence.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance.
    2. Sample size used for the test set and data provenance.
    3. Number of experts used to establish ground truth and their qualifications.
    4. Adjudication method.
    5. Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study, including effect size.
    6. Standalone performance.
    7. Type of ground truth used.
    8. Sample size for the training set.
    9. How ground truth for the training set was established.

    This information would typically be found in a more detailed technical report or study protocol, which is not provided in the given text. The 510(k) process often relies on demonstrating that a new device is "substantially equivalent" to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than requiring extensive de novo studies against specific performance criteria for every new submission, especially for material modifications.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1