Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(147 days)
Personal Lubricating Gel is designed to enhance the ease and comfort of intimate activity and is compatible with latex condoms.
Personal Lubricating Gel is a non-sterile, clear, non-staining, non-greasy, liquid gel used as a personal lubricant. This product is highly lubricous and may be used with or without a latex condom during intimate sexual activity.
The provided document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification for a Personal Lubricating Gel. It details the device's substantial equivalence to a predicate device, its intended use, and non-clinical performance data. However, the document does NOT contain information about specific acceptance criteria related to a study that proves the device meets those criteria, nor does it describe a study involving a "device" in the context of an AI/ML algorithm or diagnostic tool.
The document focuses on:
- Substantial Equivalence: Comparing the new lubricating gel to an existing, legally marketed predicate device (K-Y Ultra Gel Personal Lubricant) based on features, chemical properties, ingredients, and perceptual qualities.
- Non-Clinical Studies: Stability and preservative effectiveness of the new lubricating gel.
- Intended Use: "designed to enhance the ease and comfort of intimate activity and is compatible with latex condoms."
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table and information as it pertains to AI/ML or diagnostic device studies. The document describes a medical device (personal lubricant) and its regulatory submission, which does not typically involve the types of acceptance criteria, test sets, ground truth establishment, or multi-reader studies you've asked about for AI/ML performance.
Specifically, the information requested below is not present in the provided text:
- A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance.
- Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance.
- Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts.
- Adjudication method for the test set.
- If a multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, and its effect size.
- If a standalone (algorithm only) performance study was done.
- The type of ground truth used.
- The sample size for the training set.
- How the ground truth for the training set was established.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1