Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K041029
    Device Name
    KINETDX
    Date Cleared
    2004-07-08

    (78 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.2050
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The intended use of the KinetDx system is for the acceptance, transfer, display, storage, and post-processing of digital medical images, including manipulation and quantification.

    Device Description

    The KinetDx system is a digital image management system that includes a server. This system receives, stores, distributes, and archives images from digital image acquisition devices such as ultrasound and x-ray angiography machines. The system has workstations that can be used to review, edit, and manipulate image data; as well as review, generate quantitative data, qualitative data, and diagnostic reports.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided 510(k) summary for the KinetDx system (K041029) does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria.

    The document primarily focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices (K023772 and K992259). It describes the device's intended use, general characteristics, and safety aspects, but it does not detail any performance claims or the results of a specific study to validate those claims against quantifiable acceptance criteria.

    Therefore, I cannot populate the table or answer the specific questions as the required information is not present in the provided text.

    The document states:

    • "Risk management is ensured via a risk analysis, which is used to identify potential hazards. These potential hazards are controlled via software development, verification and validation testing."
    • "In summary, Siemens is of the opinion that KinetDx does not introduce any new potential safety risks and is substantially equivalent to and performs as well as the predicate devices."

    These statements indicate that some form of verification and validation was performed to establish safety and substantial equivalence, but the details of these tests, including specific acceptance criteria and outcome measurements, are not included in this summary.

    To provide the requested information, a different section of the 510(k) submission (e.g., performance testing reports) would be needed.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1