Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K032020
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2003-09-02

    (64 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.2050
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    51cm (20.1 inch) TFT Monochrome LCD Monitor, MU5111BW is intended to be used in displaying for diagnosis of X-ray or MRI, etc.

    Device Description

    51cm (20.1 inch) TFT Monochrome LCD Monitor, MU5111BW is a display for medical use.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a 510(k) submission for a medical monitor and does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving its performance against such criteria. The submission is a premarket notification for a new medical device, the IIYAMA CORPORATION 51cm (20.1 inch) TFT Monochrome LCD Monitor (MU5111BW), seeking substantial equivalence to a predicate device, the EIZO NANAO RadiForce G21 (K024358).

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information about acceptance criteria or a study because the provided text does not contain this information.

    The document is a 510(k) summary and FDA clearance letter, which focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device rather than presenting performance metrics against specific acceptance criteria from a primary clinical or technical study, as would be expected for a novel AI/software device or a device with new performance claims.

    The comparison in the document is primarily a feature-by-feature comparison of technical specifications between the proposed device and the predicate device to argue for substantial equivalence in design and intended use. Performance testing, if conducted, would typically be to ensure the device meets its own specifications (e.g., brightness, contrast, resolution) which are then compared to the predicate, but specific "acceptance criteria" and a "study proving it meets them" in the context of clinical performance (like diagnostic accuracy) are not detailed here.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1