Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K013566
    Date Cleared
    2001-11-20

    (25 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    862.1545
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The IMMULITE® Intact PTH and IMMULITE® 2000 Intact PTH assays are for in vitro diagnostic use with their respective analyzers for the quantitative measurement of intact parathyroid hormone (parathyrin, PTH) in EDTA plasma or serum, as an aid in the differential diagnosis of hypercalcemia and hypocalcemia.

    Device Description

    IMMULITE Intact PTH and IMMULITE 2000 Intact PTH are solid phase, chemiluminescent enzyme immunometric assays for use with their respective IMMULITE and IMMULITE 2000 Automated Analyzers.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the IMMULITE® Intact PTH and IMMULITE® 2000 Intact PTH devices. It describes the device, its intended use, and technology, but does not contain acceptance criteria or detailed study results demonstrating performance against such criteria. It states, "The data presented in this summary of safety and effectiveness is the data that the Food and Drug Administration has reviewed in its determination of substantial equivalence for IMMULITE Intact PTH and IMMULITE 2000 Intact PTH," but then does not present any of that data.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for the following information based on the provided text, as it is missing from this document:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
    2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance
    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
    4. Adjudication method for the test set
    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
    7. The type of ground truth used
    8. The sample size for the training set
    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    This document primarily focuses on the regulatory submission and classification of the device, rather than detailed performance study outcomes.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1