Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K231769
    Date Cleared
    2023-07-13

    (27 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.4515
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    activL**®** Next Generation Instrumentation

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Aesculap Implant Systems® activL® Next Generation Instrumentation are indicated for the successful implantation of the Aesculap activL® device. These instruments are intended to manipulate tissue or implant materials for the positioning, alignment, defect creation, placement, or removal of the activL® device.

    Device Description

    The activl ® Next Generation Instrumentation would allow successful implantation of the Aesculap activL® device. These are manual surgical instruments which aid in selecting, placing, and revising the activL® device. These activL® instruments device comprises of trial, trial holders, single and double chisels, implant inserter, depth stop, depth stop driver, and impaction caps.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification from the FDA regarding the activL® Next Generation Instrumentation. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than presenting a study proving a device meets specific acceptance criteria based on metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or AUC for an AI/CADe device.

    Therefore, the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert involvement, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, and ground truth establishment cannot be found or inferred from the provided text. The document pertains to manual surgical instrumentation, not an AI or diagnostic device that would typically undergo such rigorous performance evaluation.

    The "Performance Testing Summary" section (Page 4, {4}) briefly mentions:

    • Simulated use/Functional testing
    • Transit testing
    • Sterilization/Cleaning validation

    These are standard engineering and manufacturing performance tests for reusable surgical instruments, not clinical performance studies with human subjects or AI algorithm evaluations. The conclusion explicitly states the device is substantially equivalent based on "indication, design, materials, function, and performance" relative to predicate devices, and that performance testing demonstrated it "do not introduce any new question of safety or effectiveness."

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1