Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K140027
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2014-05-22

    (136 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3560
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    ZIMMER PATIENT SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTS/ SYSTEM/PLANNER

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Total Knee Replacement

    The Zimmer® Patient Specific Instruments System is intended to be used as a surgical instrument to assist in the positioning of Total Knee Replacement components intraoperatively and in guiding the marking of bone before cutting provided that anatomic landmarks necessary for alignment and positioning of the implant are identifiable on patient imaging scans.

    The Zimmer® Patient Specific Instruments System is to be used with Zimmer NexGen CR-Flex fixed bearing, Zimmer NexGen CR fixed bearing, Zimmer NexGen LPS-Flex fixed bearing, Zimmer NexGen LPS fixed bearing, Zimmer Gender Solutions Natural - Knee Flex fixed bearing, Zimmer Persona™ CR fixed bearing, Zimmer Persono™ PS fixed bearing and Zimmer Persona™ Trabecular Metal™ prostheses families only.

    Unicompartmental Knee Replacement

    The Zimmer® Patient Specific Instruments System is intended to be used as a surgical instrument to assist in the positioning of Unicompartmental Knee Replacement components intra-operatively and in guiding the marking of bone before cutting and to guide cutting of the bone provided that anatomic landmarks necessary for alignment and positioning of the implant are identifiable on patient imaging scans.

    The Zimmer® Patient Specific Instruments System is to be used with Zimmer Unicompartmental High Flex Knee System prostheses families only.

    The Zimmer® Patient Specific Instruments are intended for single use only.

    Device Description

    The subject device Zimmer® Patient Specific Instruments System 6.0 is a modification to the predicate device Zimmer® Patient Specific Instruments System 4.0 (K113829) to accommodate the new compatible implant system Zimmer® Persona'''' components, cleared via 510(k)s K113369, K122745 and K121771. A similar change was done for Zimmer® Patient Specific Instruments System 5.0 (K121640) where the Zimmer® Personal™ components, cleared via 510(k) K113369, were added to MRI image based system. Zimmer® Patient Specific Instruments System 6.0 is designed to assist a surgeon in the placement of total knee replacement components for Zimmer® Persona'" components. The system consists of a software device, branded as Zimmer® Patient Specific Instruments Planner (ZPSIP) and a hardware component, branded as Zimmer® Patient Specific Instruments (ZPSI).

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) Premarket Notification for the Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments System 6.0. It describes the device, its intended use, and its technological characteristics as compared to predicate devices. However, it does not contain information about specific acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria, as typically found in clinical validation reports or detailed performance studies.

    Instead, the document states: "Results of software verification and validation testing demonstrated the device's safety and effectiveness is substantially equivalent to the predicate device." This indicates that the device's performance was evaluated against the predicate device, Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments System 4.0 (K113829) and 5.0 (K121640), rather than against pre-defined, quantitative acceptance criteria for new performance claims.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information for the following points:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
    2. Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance
    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and their qualifications
    4. Adjudication method for the test set
    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done
    6. If a standalone performance (algorithm only) was done
    7. The type of ground truth used
    8. The sample size for the training set
    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to previously cleared devices through technological similarity and general software verification and validation, rather than presenting a standalone performance study with specific acceptance criteria.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1