Search Results

The Well Lead PVC Hydrophilic Urethral Catheter is launched for clean intermittent catheterization-CIC treatment and indicated for use by patients with chronic urine retention. The catheter is inserted into the bladder through the urethra for emptying the bladder.

The Well Lead PVC Hydrophilic Urethral Catheter is a flexible tubular single use urinary catheter that is inserted through the urethra to allow drainage of the bladder. The device consists of disposable polyvinyl chloride catheter (medical grade PVC) coated with hydrophilic polymer. When the catheter is immersed in water for 30 seconds it becomes slippery and ready to use.
The catheters come in sizes from 12Fr-24Fr for Male, 12Fr-24Fr for Female and 6Fr-10Fr for Pediatric.

The provided text describes the regulatory submission for the Well Lead PVC Hydrophilic Urethral Catheter. However, it does not contain information about a study comparing the device's performance against specific acceptance criteria in the context of an AI/human-in-the-loop system. The document is primarily a 510(k) summary demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device for a medical catheter, focusing on non-clinical performance and biocompatibility.

Therefore, many of the requested categories related to AI models, clinical studies, ground truth establishment, and expert involvement are not applicable to the provided information.

Here's an analysis based on the information available:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document lists performance tests with the standard they were tested to and the result ("Complies"). These can be considered the acceptance criteria for those specific physical and material properties.

*Note: For sterility, ETO residual, and biocompatibility, the document states the validation method or that the tests were performed, which implies the results met the criteria for approval, even if the exact "Complies" is not explicitly stated in the table for every test as it is for others.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

For the non-clinical performance testing (Flow Rate, Strength, Connector Security, Coefficients of Friction), testing was completed on 3 different size catheters: 8Fr (pediatric size), 14Fr, and 24Fr. The document doesn't specify the number of units per size.
For other tests like packaging and biocompatibility, the sample size is not explicitly stated.
The data provenance (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is not mentioned for these tests. This is a medical device submission, not a clinical trial or AI study, so standard data provenance details for patient data are not relevant here.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

Not applicable. This document is about the physical and chemical properties of a medical device, not an AI model requiring expert-established ground truth from images or patient data.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

Not applicable. This is not an AI model evaluation study involving human adjudication of results.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This document does not describe an AI device or an MRMC study.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

Not applicable. This document does not describe an AI algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

For the non-clinical tests, the "ground truth" is defined by the standards (e.g., ISO 11607, EN1616) they were tested against. The physical and chemical properties of the catheter (e.g., flow rate, strength, seal integrity, biocompatibility) are measured against these established engineering and biological safety standards.

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable. This document does not describe an AI model with a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable. This document does not describe an AI model.

Ask a specific question about this device