Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K071163
    Date Cleared
    2007-07-18

    (83 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    868.5905
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The WEINMANNcomfort 2 is for the treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in adult patients. The optional integrated humidifier (WEINMANNaqua) is indicated for the humidification and warming of air from the WEINMANNcomfort 2 flow generator device. The WEINMANNcomfort 2 and WEINMANNaqua are for home and hospital use.

    Device Description

    The WEINMANNcomfort 2 is a microprocessor controlled blower-based device that generates a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) from 4 to 20 cmH2O for the treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). The system includes the flow generator, patient tubing, external power supply, and an optional heated humidifier WEINMANNaqua. A radial compressor draws in ambient air via a filter and conveys it to the unit outlet. From here the air flows through the hose system and the mask to the patient. The WEINMANNcomfort 2 has one mode of operation (CPAP fixed-pressure mode). In this mode the flow generator provides a single fixed-pressure as set by the clinician. Automatic switch on/off can be activated on WEINMANNcomfort 2. The unit can then be switched on by breathing into the mask and will switch off when the mask is removed. The softstart automatic system is installed to help the patient fall asleep more easily. The optional breath humidifier WEINMANNaqua can be snapped onto the therapy unit. The air from the flow generator is directed over a water surface in the humidifier, which functions according to the pass-over principle.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a 510(k) summary for the WEINMANNcomfort 2, a CPAP device. This document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than providing detailed acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria in the way typically expected for novel AI or diagnostic devices.

    Therefore, many of the requested categories simply cannot be filled from the given text.

    Here's a breakdown based on the information provided:

    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance

    The document states: "Design verification testing was performed to ensure that the WEINMANNcomfort 2 based on risk analysis and product requirements met its specifications. All tests were verified to meet acceptance criteria." However, it does not provide a table of these specific acceptance criteria or the reported device performance against them.

    Acceptance Criteria CategoryReported Device Performance
    Specific Performance Criteria (e.g., pressure accuracy, flow stability, noise levels, etc.)Not detailed in the provided text. The document broadly states that "All tests were verified to meet acceptance criteria."
    BiocompatibilityVerified to meet acceptance criteria, ensuring "equivalent safety of the materials that are used."

    Study Details

    The document refers to "Design verification testing" and "Biocompatibility testing" but does not describe them as a comparative clinical study or a study specifically designed to establish performance against acceptance criteria in a quantitative, reportable manner beyond a general statement of compliance.

    1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable. This was design verification testing, not a clinical trial with a "test set" in the context of AI or diagnostic performance.
    2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. Ground truth for a CPAP device's performance would typically refer to objective measurements of its physical parameters, not expert consensus on diagnostic interpretations.
    3. Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable.
    4. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This is a CPAP device, not an AI diagnostic tool.
    5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done: The device itself is standalone in terms of generating CPAP pressure. Performance was evaluated through design verification.
    6. The type of ground truth used: For physical performance parameters (e.g., pressure output, flow), the ground truth would be established by calibrated measurement equipment and industry standards. For biocompatibility, it would be established by standardized testing protocols. The document does not specify the exact ground truth methodologies used for each verification test.
    7. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This is a hardware medical device, not an AI algorithm requiring a training set.
    8. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1