Search Results

Indicated to soothe and cool teething babies and help reduce teething pain.

The proposed Water-filled teether is a simple plastic shaped device which is filled with water. It may be placed in a refrigerator to be cooled and then provided to the teething baby to help sooth any pain from teething. This is an OTC device.

The provided text is for a Water-Filled Teether, which is a medical device of Class II (Fluid-filled teething ring, 21 CFR 872.5550). This type of device does not typically involve complex algorithms, AI, or advanced imaging, and as such, the concept of a "study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" in the context of clinical trials with human readers, ground truth establishment, or multi-reader multi-case studies, as described in your prompt's subsequent questions, is not applicable here.

Instead, acceptance criteria for this device are based on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device through non-clinical performance testing against established safety standards for toy and medical device materials, as well as an identical indication for use.

Here's an analysis based on the provided document:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Regarding the other questions in your prompt, as explained above, they are not applicable to the evaluation of this specific medical device (a water-filled teether) as described in the 510(k) summary. This document concerns a physical product with predetermined safety and performance characteristics, not an AI or software-driven diagnostic or image analysis tool.

Here's why the other points are not relevant in this context:

• 2. Sample size for the test set and data provenance: No "test set" in the sense of patient data is used. The testing involves physical samples of the device and its materials. The provenance of the actual materials used for the physical device would be its manufacturing origin (Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China).
• 3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and their qualifications: "Ground truth" in this context refers to compliance with established international and national safety standards (ISO, CFR, ASTM, CPSIA, CA Prop 65). The "experts" are the regulatory bodies and standard-setting organizations that define these criteria, and the laboratories that perform the tests according to these standards, not medical experts evaluating AI performance.
• 4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable. Compliance is determined by objective laboratory test results against predefined pass/fail criteria for each standard.
• 5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable, as this is not an AI/diagnostic device.
• 6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable.
• 7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): The "ground truth" for this device is the objective performance against established safety standards and regulatory requirements. For example, a "pass" on a phthalates test means the device's material has phthalate levels below the regulated limit.
• 8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable, as no algorithm or AI model is being trained.
• 9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Water Filled Teether is used for the temporary relief of pain and discomfort in infants and toddlers caused by teething.

Not Found

This document is a 510(k) premarket notification letter from the FDA regarding a Water Filled Teether. It is a regulatory approval document, not a study report. Therefore, it does not contain the information requested about acceptance criteria, device performance, study details, or ground truth establishment.

The letter confirms that the device is "substantially equivalent" to legally marketed predicate devices, meaning it has met the regulatory requirements for this type of device based on existing standards, rather than new performance studies with specific statistical outcomes.

Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from the provided text.

Ask a specific question about this device

-User is asked to wash teethers in warm, soapy water, rinse clean, and then to chill them in refrigerator -teether then acts as a cold compress for baby's gums and helps reduce the discomfort of teething

Water Filled Teether

This document is a 510(k) premarket notification letter from the FDA for a "Baby Snoopy Water Filled Teether". It confirms that the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.

However, this document does not contain the type of information requested about acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, ground truth, or multi-reader multi-case studies, which are typically associated with performance evaluations of AI/ML-enabled medical devices or diagnostic tools.

The letter is a regulatory approval based on demonstrating substantial equivalence, not a performance study of a device against specific acceptance criteria in the way your prompt describes. The device is a "teething ring," a simple consumer product, not a complex diagnostic or therapeutic device requiring extensive clinical performance studies.

Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from this document.

Ask a specific question about this device

Ask a specific question about this device

Ask a specific question about this device