Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K052130
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2005-08-15

    (10 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.6660
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    VITA IN-CERAM 2000 AL CUBES FOR INLAB, MODELS AL20/AL40

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    In-Ceram® 2000 AL CUBES for inLab® are indicated for use as a substructure for porcelain fused ceramic fixed dental restorations; for single unit anterior or posterior crowns and 3 unit anterior bridges.

    Substructures of AL Cubes for Cerec are machined using the Cerec 2, Cerec 3 and InLab cad/cam systems.

    For use by or on the order of a dental professional such as DDS or DMD. Not for use by the general public or OTC.

    Device Description

    Vita In-Ceram® 2000 AL Cubes for inLab® are indicated for use as a substructure for porcelain fused ceramic fixed dental restorations; for single unit anterior or posterior crowns and 3 unit anterior bridges. Substructures of AL Cubes for Cerec are machined using the Cerec 2, Cerec 3 and InLab cad/cam systems.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification letter from the FDA regarding "Vita In-Ceram® 2000 AL Cubes for inLab®". It states that the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices and outlines general control provisions and other regulations.

    However, the document does not contain specific information about acceptance criteria, device performance metrics, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, or study designs (e.g., MRMC, standalone) as requested in your prompt. This type of information is typically found in the test reports, clinical study summaries, or performance sections of a 510(k) submission, but it is not detailed in the FDA's decision letter provided here.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table and information based on the given text. The document confirms the device's classification and allows it to be marketed, but it does not delve into the technical validation studies that led to that determination.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1