Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K952802
    Date Cleared
    1996-05-23

    (339 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    866.3820
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    VISUWELL REAGIN II

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Visuwell® Reagin II is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the in vitro qualitative detection of non-treponemal (reagin) antibodies as a screening test in syphilis serology. It is not intended for use in screening blood or plasma donors.

    Device Description

    Visuwell® Reagin II is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the in vitro qualitative detection of non-treponemal (reagin) antibodies in syphills serology. In this device, serum is incubated with a mixture of cardiolipin, lecithin, cholesterol dried to a polystyrene solid phase. Antilipid antibodies react with the lipoidal antigen to form an immune complex. The presence of non-treponemal complexed antibodies is detected with a monoclonal anti-human lgG-peroxidase conjugate. The presence of bound conjugate is detected by the addition of enzyme substrate and subsequent development of colour. The reaction is stopped by the addition of acid and colour intensity is determined spectrophotometrically at 450 nm. Test results are interpreted relative to a floating cutoff based on the negative control. Positive and negative controls are used for establishing test validity.

    AI/ML Overview

    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance Study for Visuwell® Reagin II

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance Criteria CategoryAcceptance Criteria (Reference Non-Treponemal Tests Performance)Visuwell® Reagin II Reported PerformanceMet Acceptance Criteria?
    Specificity99.5%97.1%Substantially equivalent
    Sensitivity (Untreated Syphilis)95.8%92.2%Substantially equivalent
    Sensitivity (Treatment Status Unknown)82.4%93.2%Substantially equivalent (Exceeded)
    Sensitivity (Treated Syphilis)90.2%75.4%Lower reactivity, but considered substantially equivalent for untreated syphilis detection. Suggests potential for monitoring therapy.
    Predictive Value of Positive (STD Population)99.4%97.4%Substantially equivalent
    Predictive Value of Negative (All Sites)99.5%99.0%Substantially equivalent
    Specificity in Cross-Reactivity (Non-Syphilitic Conditions)91.9%86.8%Substantially equivalent
    Overall AgreementNot explicitly stated as a single number (comparison to reference tests)96.5%Substantially equivalent

    Note on "Substantially equivalent": The report explicitly states that Visuwell® Reagin II was "substantially equivalent" in performance to the reference tests despite some numerical differences. For example, for sensitivity in treated syphilis, Visuwell® Reagin II showed lower reactivity (75.4% vs 90.2%), but this was interpreted as potentially beneficial for therapy monitoring, and the device was still deemed substantially equivalent for its primary intended use of detecting non-treponemal antibody in untreated syphilis.

    2. Sample Sizes Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Specificity Comparison: 10,738 specimens from random, low-risk, and high-risk populations.
    • Sensitivity Comparison:
      • 306 patients with untreated syphilis
      • 74 patients with unknown treatment status
      • 325 patients with treated syphilis
    • Predictive Values:
      • Predictive value of positive calculated for the Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) population.
      • Predictive value of negative calculated with data from "all sites."
    • Cross-Reactivity: 151 specimens from individuals with various bacterial, viral, and auto-immune disorders, including syphilis biological false-positives, pregnancy, and drug abuse.
    • Overall Agreement: 11,443 total sera (presumably the aggregate of relevant specificity and sensitivity samples).

    Data Provenance: The document does not explicitly state the country of origin or whether the data was retrospective or prospective. It refers to "various populations" and "all sites," suggesting a multicenter study, but lacks specific details on geographical location or study design.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

    The document does not provide information on the number of experts used or their qualifications for establishing ground truth. The comparison is made against "legally marketed reference non-treponemal tests" (VDRL, RPR, RST), implying that the results from these established tests were considered the ground truth.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    The document does not describe any specific adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1). The nature of the study involves comparing the Visuwell® Reagin II results directly to the results obtained from established reference non-treponemal tests. The interpretation of these reference tests (VDRL, RPR, RST) is described as "subjective... according to the presence or absence of flocculation," which implies expert interpretation of the reference test results themselves, but no explicit adjudication process for disagreements is mentioned.

    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

    No Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was mentioned. The study focused on the performance of the Visuwell® Reagin II device compared to existing non-treponemal tests, not on human reader performance with or without AI assistance.

    6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance)

    Yes, this was a standalone performance study. Visuwell® Reagin II is an "enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay," and its results are "objectively spectrophotometrically interpreted." This indicates an automated or semi-automated process where the device's output (color intensity) is directly converted into a result relative to a floating cutoff, without human-in-the-loop interpretation being the primary focus of the comparison with reference methods.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth was established by comparison to existing, legally marketed reference non-treponemal tests (Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) Slide Test, Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) Card Test, Reagin Screen Test (RST)). These tests are implied to be the standard of care for detecting non-treponemal antibodies in syphilis serology. Clinical diagnosis of syphilis (e.g., "patients with untreated syphilis") was also used to categorize some samples for sensitivity calculations.

    8. Sample Size for the Training Set

    The document does not provide specific details about a dedicated "training set" or its size for the Visuwell® Reagin II device development. The information presented pertains to a performance study evaluating the final device's performance against reference methods.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    As no specific training set is described in the provided text, there is no information on how its ground truth was established. The focus of this submission is on the validation of the device, comparing its performance to established methods in various clinical populations.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1