Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K042275
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2004-10-28

    (66 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    886.5925
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    VISTAKON (SENOFILCON A) SOFT CONTACT LENS

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The VISTAKON® (senofilcon A) Contact Lens is indicated for daily wear for the correction of refractive ametropia (myopia and hyperopia) in phakic or aphakic persons with non-diseased eyes who may have 1.00D or less of astigmatism.

    The VISTAKON® (senofilcon A) Multifocal Contact Lens is indicated for daily wear for the correction of distance and near vision in presbyopic, phakic or aphakit persons with non-diseased eyes who may have 0.75 D of astigmatism or less.

    The VISTAKON® (senofilcon A) Toric Contact Lens is indicated for daily wear for the correction of visual acuity in phakic or aphakic persons with non-diseased eyes that are hyperopic or myopic and may have 10.00 D of astigmatism or less.

    The VISTAKON® (senofilcon A) Multifocal-Toric Contact Lens is indicated for daily wear for the correction of distance and near vision in presby opic phakic or apakic persons with non-diseased eyes who may have 10.00 D of astigmatism or less.

    VISTAKON® (senofilcon A) UV Blocking Contact Lenses help protect against transmission of harmful UV radiation to the cornea and into the eye.

    Eye Care Practitioners may prescribe the lenses either for single-use disposable wear or frequent/planned replacement wear with cleaning, disinfection and scheduled replacement. When prescribed for frequent/planned replacement wear, the lenses may be disinfected using a chemical disinfection system only.

    Device Description

    • The VISTAKON® (senofilcon A) Contact Lens Clear and Visibility Tint with UV Blocker is available as a spherical lens, a multifocal lens, a toric lens and a multifocal-toric lens.
    • The lenses are made of a silicone hydrogel material containing an internal wetting agent.
    • The VISTAKON® (senofilcon A) Contact Lens may be tinted blue using Reactive Blue Dye #4 to make the lens more visible for handling.
    • A benzotriazole UV absorbing monomer is used to block UV radiation. The transmittance characteristics are less than 1% in the UVB range of 280 – 315nm and less than 10% in the UVA range of 316 – 380nm.
    • The VISTAKON® (senofilcon A) Contact Lens is a hemispherical or hemitoric shell.
    • The lens is supplied in a sterile state, packaged in a buffered saline solution with 0.005% methyl ether cellulose.
    • The composition of the lens is 62% senofilcon A and 38% water by weight when hydrated and stored in the buffered saline solution.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's a summary of the acceptance criteria and study information for the VISTAKON® (senofilcon A) Contact Lens, based on the provided text:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The submission focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than setting specific numeric acceptance criteria for revolutionary performance. The "acceptance criteria" here are implied through comparative performance to the predicate and general safety/effectiveness.

    Characteristic / Study OutcomePredicate Device (Focus® NIGHT AND DAY™ (lotrafilcon A) Contact Lens)VISTAKON® (senofilcon A) Contact LensAcceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Performance (VISTAKON®)
    Material TypeGroup IGroup IMatching predicate material groupGroup I
    Water Content (%)Labeled: 24, Measured: 23Labeled: 38, Measured: 38Safe, effective, and similar in overall performance to predicate38%
    Refractive Index @ 20°CLabeled: 1.43, Measured: 1.43Labeled: 1.42, Measured: 1.42Safe, effective, and similar in overall performance to predicate1.42
    Dk (edge corrected)Labeled: 140, Measured: 141Labeled: 103, Measured: 107Safe, effective, and similar in overall performance to predicate107
    Dk (non-edge corrected)NA, Measured: 168NA, Measured: 126Safe, effective, and similar in overall performance to predicate126
    Base Curve (mm)Labeled: 8.4, Measured: 8.47Labeled: 8.8, Measured: 8.81Safe, effective, and similar in overall performance to predicate8.81
    Diameter (mm)Labeled: 13.8, Measured: 13.80Labeled: 14.6, Measured: 14.62Safe, effective, and similar in overall performance to predicate14.62
    Power (D)Labeled: -1.00, Measured: -1.11Labeled: -0.50, Measured: -0.35Safe, effective, and similar in overall performance to predicate-0.35
    Toxicology/BiocompatibilityN/A - Predicate established as safeNot toxic, not irritatingNot toxic and not irritatingConfirmed non-toxic and non-irritating
    Lens Physical/Material PropertiesConsistent with currently marketed lensesConsistent with currently marketed lensesConsistent with currently marketed lensesConfirmed consistent
    Clinical Performance (Safety/Efficacy)N/A - Predicate established as safe/effectiveSimilar overall performance to concurrent controlsSimilar overall performance in vision, health, comfort, and fit compared to controlsDemonstrated similar overall performance

    2. Sample Size for Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Sample Size: "at least 50 patients" were evaluated in the clinical study.
    • Data Provenance: The document does not explicitly state the country of origin for the clinical study. It was a prospective clinical study conducted over "three (3) months".

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications

    The document does not specify the number of experts or their qualifications for establishing ground truth within the clinical study. The clinical study evaluated parameters like adverse reactions, keratometry changes, reasons for discontinuations, and unscheduled lens replacements, which would typically be assessed by eye care professionals.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    The document does not describe any specific adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1) for the clinical study data or outcomes.

    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

    No. This type of study (MRMC for AI assistance) is not applicable to this device, which is a contact lens and not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool. The study was a clinical trial comparing the new contact lens to a predicate lens.

    6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance

    Not applicable. This device is a contact lens and does not involve an algorithm.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth for the clinical study appears to be based on clinical assessments and observations by investigators during the study, evaluating parameters such as visual acuity, ocular health, comfort, and fit, as well as adverse reactions. For toxicology and biocompatibility, the ground truth was established through in vitro and in vivo preclinical toxicology and biocompatibility tests following GLP regulations.

    8. Sample Size for the Training Set

    Not applicable. This device is a contact lens and does not involve an AI algorithm with a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable. As there is no AI algorithm, there is no training set or ground truth for a training set.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1