Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K974204
    Date Cleared
    1998-01-08

    (59 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.6640
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    VISTACAM OMNI AND VIASTCAM OMNI (IC)

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The VistaCam Omni™ system is primarily a tool to provide visual information to dental patients so they may be better equipped to make decisions about the quantity and quality of the healphed co they receive.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a medical device called "Vistacam Omni™ and Vistacam Omni (IC)". This type of letter confirms that the device is substantially equivalent to a previously marketed device and does not inherently contain information about specific acceptance criteria or detailed study results. The document focuses on regulatory approval rather than technical performance data.

    Therefore, most of the information requested in your prompt is not available within this document.

    Here's what can be inferred or explicitly stated based on the provided text:

    • Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance: This information is not present. A 510(k) clearance generally relies on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, which implies the new device performs at least as well as the predicate for its intended use, but specific quantitative acceptance criteria or detailed performance metrics are typically not detailed in the final clearance letter itself. These would be part of the original 510(k) submission, which is not provided here.
    • Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not available.
    • Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not available.
    • Adjudication method: Not available.
    • Multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study: Not mentioned and typically not the primary focus of a 510(k) for a device like this, which primarily provides "visual information to dental patients."
    • Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) study: Not applicable as this is a physical imaging device, not an AI algorithm.
    • Type of ground truth used: Not available.
    • Sample size for the training set: Not applicable (not an AI device with a training set).
    • How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

    In summary, the provided document does not contain the detailed study information or acceptance criteria you've requested. It is purely a regulatory clearance document.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1