Search Results

The Sight Sciences Viscoelastic Injector is a manually operated device for delivery of small amounts of viscoelastic fluid, for example Healon™ or HealonGV™ from Abbott Medical Optics (AMO), Amvisc™ from Bausch & Lomb, or PROVISC™ from Alcon, during ophthalmic surgery.

The Sight Sciences Viscoelastic Injector is a sterile, single use, manually operated instrument used by ophthalmologists to deliver small amounts of viscoelastic into the eye during ophthalmic surgery. The Viscoelastic Injector is designed to function with commonly used viscoelastic fluids made commercially available by companies such as Abbott Medical Optics (AMO), Bausch & Lomb, and Alcon. The Sight Sciences Viscoelastic Injector dispenses fluid on the principle of exchanging volumes much like a syringe. The handheld instrument includes a cannula, injection tube, internal reservoir, plunger tube and finger wheels. The finger wheels on the handle of the device are used to advance the plunger tube into the viscoelastic fluid reservoir thereby dispensing viscoelastic fluid. The finger wheels are placed on both sides of the handle facilitating viscoelastic delivery in either the left or right eye (00 or OS) using either hand.

The provided text does not contain detailed acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria in the typical format for medical device performance studies (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy for diagnostic devices, or specific numerical targets for functional performance).

The document is a 510(k) summary for a "Viscoelastic Injector," indicating it's a submission for regulatory clearance in the US, asserting substantial equivalence to a predicate device. The information provided is primarily for regulatory purposes and highlights manufacturing, design, and general performance testing rather than a clinical efficacy study with detailed metrics and statistical analysis.

Based on the available text, here's what can be extracted and what information is missing:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

Missing Information: Specific, quantifiable acceptance criteria (e.g., "dispenses fluid within +/- X% of target volume," "material strength exceeds Y MPa," "withstands Z N of force") are not provided. The reported performance is general and qualitative ("performs as intended," "functionally equivalent").

2. Sample Size for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

• Sample Size: Not specified. The document states "performance testing was conducted," but no number of devices tested or the amount of data collected (e.g., number of injections, duration of tests) is given.
• Data Provenance: Not specified, but given the nature of a 510(k) submission for a manufacturing and design modification, it's highly likely this was retrospective testing performed on manufactured devices in an engineering lab setting, rather than human-centric prospective studies. The country of origin for the data is not mentioned but can be inferred to be within the US or by the manufacturer, Sight Sciences, Inc., based in California.

3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth:

• Not applicable for this type of device and study. The "ground truth" for a mechanical device like a viscoelastic injector typically refers to engineering specifications, material properties, and functional output (e.g., volume dispensed, pressure exerted). It doesn't involve clinical "experts" establishing a ground truth in the same way as a diagnostic imaging device. The testing would be against established engineering standards and validated measurement techniques.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

• Not applicable. Adjudication methods (2+1, 3+1, etc.) are used in clinical studies where human interpretation of data (e.g., medical images) requires consensus. This device's performance testing would involve objective measurements against engineering specifications.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:

• No comparison study mentioned. The document states the device is "manually operated" by ophthalmologists, but there's no mention of a comparative effectiveness study involving human readers (ophthalmologists) with and without the device, or against a different device, to measure improvement in human performance "with AI vs without AI assistance." This device is a tool, not an AI diagnostic assistant.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance:

• Not applicable. This device is a manually operated mechanical injector, not an AI algorithm. Its performance is tied directly to its physical function.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used:

• The "ground truth" for this device's performance testing would be based on engineering specifications and validated metrology/measurement standards. For example, the accuracy of dispensed volume would be measured against a known reference standard using calibrated equipment. The material strength would be tested against established mechanical engineering limits. The text broadly refers to "viscoelastic injector dispensing performance, intrinsic strength of the materials, and the load to which the Sight Science Viscoelastic Injector would be subjected during intended use" as the basis for acceptance criteria, implying these engineering and functional benchmarks.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set:

• Not applicable. This is a mechanical device, not an AI system that requires a training set.

9. How Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established:

• Not applicable. As above, no training set for an AI-like system is involved.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Sight Sciences Viscoelastic Injector is a manually operated device for delivery of small amounts of viscoelastic fluid, for example Healon™ or HealonGV™ from Abbott Medical Optics (AMO), Amvisc™ from Bausch & Lomb, or PROVISC™ from Alcon, during ophthalmic surgery.

The Sight Sciences Viscoelastic Injector is a sterile, single use, manually operated instrument used by ophthalmologists to deliver small amounts of viscoelastic into the eye during ophthalmic surgery. The Viscoelastic Injector is designed to function with commonly used viscoelastic fluids made commercially available by companies such as Abbott Medical Optics (AMO), Bausch & Lomb, and Alcon. The Sight Sciences Viscoelastic Injector dispenses fluid on the principle of exchanging volumes much like a syringe. The handheld instrument includes a cannula, injection tube, internal reservoir, plunger tube and finger wheels. The finger wheels on the handle of the device are used to advance the plunger tube into the viscoelastic fluid reservoir thereby dispensing viscoelastic fluid. The finger wheels are placed on both sides of the handle facilitating viscoelastic delivery in either the left or right eye (OD or OS) using either hand.

The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the Sight Sciences Viscoelastic Injector, a medical device for delivering viscoelastic fluid during ophthalmic surgery. While the document mentions performance testing, it does not contain the specific details required to fully answer the request regarding acceptance criteria and the comprehensive study that proves the device meets those criteria.

Here's an analysis based on the available information:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Missing Information: The document states that acceptance criteria were "based on viscoinjector dispensing performances, intrinsic strength of the materials, and the load to which the Sight Science Viscoelastic Injector would be subjected during intended use." However, it does not explicitly state the quantitative or qualitative targets for these criteria (e.g., "dispensing accuracy within X%", "material strength > Y MPa"). The reported performance is a general statement that "testing demonstrated that the proposed device performs as intended and is functionally equivalent to the predicate device," without specific data points to correlate to the acceptance criteria.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

• Sample size for test set: Not specified.
• Data provenance: Not specified (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective).

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

• Number of experts: Not specified.
• Qualifications of experts: Not specified.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

• Adjudication method: Not specified.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• MRMC study: Not applicable. This device is a manually operated instrument for delivering fluid, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or imaging device used by human readers. Therefore, an MRMC study comparing human reader performance with and without AI assistance is irrelevant to this device.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

• Standalone performance: Not applicable. This is a mechanical device, not an algorithm. Its performance is inherent in its physical and mechanical functions, not in an independent algorithm. The "simulated use testing" would be the closest analogue, but it still involves human interaction, albeit in a controlled test environment.

7. The type of ground truth used

• Type of ground truth: Not explicitly stated, but based on the nature of the device (a fluid injector), the "ground truth" would likely be derived from:
  • Metrological measurements: Precise measurement of dispensed volumes, flow rates, and consistency.
  • Physical properties analysis: Testing material strength, durability, and sterility.
  • Functional performance: Observational and quantitative data from simulated use, verifying the device's ability to inject viscoelastic fluid smoothly, accurately, and without issues.

8. The sample size for the training set

• Sample size for training set: Not applicable. This is a mechanical device, not an AI model that requires a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• Ground truth for training set: Not applicable (as above).

Ask a specific question about this device