Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K190060
    Device Name
    Urethrotech UCD
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2019-10-04

    (266 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    876.5130
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Urethrotech UCD

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Urethrotech Urethral Catheterization Device is intended for use for bladder management including urine drainage, collection and measurement and / or bladder fluid instillation or irrigation.

    Device Description

    The Urethrotech UCD® (Urethral Catheterization Device) 3-way Silicone Foley Balloon Catheter is composed of a silicone tube with an embedded radiopaque blue stripe, a silicone balloon and polyvinylchloride valve and an integrated introducer guidewire. The tube has three lumen for urinary drainage which is to be connected to a urine collection container, one lumen with two-way valve for inflation/deflation of a Foley balloon and one lumen for the integrated removable guidewire made of Nitinol with hydrophilic coating for the introduction of the catheter through the urethra into the bladder to negotiate any prostatic curve or tight external urethral sphincter, and also for irrigation of the bladder after guidewire removal. The UCD® is intended to be used to provide safe urinary tract access through the urethra and into the bladder and to pass fluids to and from the urinary bladder and to provide continuous bladder irrigation of fluids and drainage of urine from the urinary tract. The device is provided sterile and is intended for short-term use (

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Urethrotech UCD®, a urethral catheterization device. It details the device description, indications for use, comparison to a predicate device, and performance testing. However, it does not describe a study involving an AI or algorithm-based device, human readers, or the establishment of ground truth by expert consensus.

    Therefore, many of the requested items related to AI/algorithm performance, human reader studies, and ground truth establishment cannot be extracted from this document. The document describes traditional medical device performance testing, not AI/ML model validation.

    Here's an analysis based on the available information:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    StandardTest DescriptionAcceptance CriteriaResults
    ASTM F 623-19, Section 4.1Flow Rate through Drainage LumenLabel French size catheters 14 through 24 inclusive shall have a minimum average flow rate of 100 cm3/min, and a label French size 12 catheter shall have a flow rate of 70 cm3/min.4 Pass/ 0 Fail
    ASTM F 623-19, Section 4.2Balloon IntegrityThe inflation balloon must be inflated easily with distilled or deionized water to labeled volume without showing any evidence of breakage throughout the test period.4 Pass/ 0 Fail
    ASTM F 623-19, Section 4.3Inflated Balloon Response to PulloutThe entire balloon of catheters label French size 14 through 26 shall not pass into or through the funnel barrel.4 Pass/ 0 Fail
    ASTM F 623-19, Section 4.4Balloon Volume MaintenanceCatheter maintains its volume throughout the test4 Pass/ 0 Fail
    ASTM F 623-19, Section 4.5Balloon Size and Shaft SizeThe base dimension for the requirement on sizes and tolerances on the diameter of the catheter tip, the size of the balloon, and the diameter of the shaft is the “label French size.” The proximal catheter tip, the balloon, and the shaft, for 10 in. distal to the balloon, shall meet the requirements on size and tolerances on diameter shown in Table 1 of ASTM F623.4 Pass/ 0 Fail
    ASTM F 623-19, Section 4.6Deflation ReliabilityBalloon deflates to within four French sizes of the label French size within 15 minutes or be otherwise manipulated to effect drainage within this time period4 Pass/ 0 Fail

    Biocompatibility Testing:

    Biological EffectTestCompliance Standard
    CytotoxicityMem ElutionISO10993-5
    Systemic ToxicitySystemic Injection TestISO10993-11
    Systemic ToxicitySubchronic Toxicity Study in RatsISO10993-11
    SensitizationMagnusson-Kligman testISO10993-10
    Irritation, Intracutaneous ToxicityIntracutaneous Injection TestISO10993-10
    PyrogenicityPyrogenicity TestISO10993-11
    (Note: Results for biocompatibility tests are not explicitly stated as 'Pass/Fail' in the provided text, just that these tests were deemed appropriate and likely conducted.)

    2. Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance
    For the physical performance tests (ASTM F 623-19 sections), the sample size was 4 for each test (indicated by "4 Pass/ 0 Fail," meaning 4 samples were tested and all passed).
    The provenance of the data (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is not specified. These are typical in-vitro/bench tests, not clinical studies involving patient data. The device sponsor is Urethrotech Ltd., based in the United Kingdom.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
    Not applicable. This document describes physical performance testing of a medical device, not a study evaluating an AI algorithm's performance against human expert ground truth.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
    Not applicable. This describes physical performance testing, not a clinical study requiring adjudication of diagnoses or findings.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
    No. The document explicitly states: "Clinical testing was not performed with this device." This is not an AI-assisted device that would involve human readers.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
    No. This is not an AI/algorithm-based device.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
    The "ground truth" for the performance tests derived from established engineering and material science standards (ASTM, ISO) for medical devices, defining acceptable physical properties and performance characteristics (e.g., flow rate, balloon integrity, material biocompatibility). It is based on objective measurements against these standards, not medical diagnoses.

    8. The sample size for the training set
    Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a training set.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
    Not applicable. As above, no training set for an AI/ML model.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1