Search Results

Posterior Fixation / Attachment (Pedicle fixation): The Ultium Spinal Plating System bolts when placed in the pedicles are intended only for patients: (a) having severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) of the fifth lumbar - first sacral (LS-S1) vertebral joint; (b) who are receiving fusions using autogenous bone graft only; (c) who are having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine; and (d) who are having the device removed after the development of a solid fusion mass. When used as a pedicle screw system, the bolts may be used for the indications specified previously to affix the plates to vertebral levels L3 to S1 inclusive.

Anterior Fixation / Attachment (antervertebral intervertebral bodies). The Ultium Spinal Plating System when attached anterolaterally to the vertebral bodies of levels T10 to S1, inclusive, is intended for the treatment of: degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic orgin with degeneration of the disk confirmed by historical and radiographic studies); pseudarthrosis, stenosis. scoliosis, spondylolisthesis; unsuccessful previous attempts at spinal fusion; or tumor resection.

The Ultium Soinal Plating System includes plates, a locking nut, standard bolts, and offset bolts. All components are manufactured from a titanium alloy.

The provided text describes a medical device, the Ultium Spinal Plating System, and its substantial equivalence to other systems already on the market. It also details the device's components, indications for use, and mechanical testing results.

However, the input does not contain information related to an AI/ML-based device, nor does it describe a study involving an acceptance criteria table, device performance metrics, sample sizes for test/training sets, expert ground truth, adjudication methods, or MRMC studies.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for the specific information points as they are not present in the provided text.

The text does mention:

• Substantial Equivalence: The safety and effectiveness are based on the long history of use of similar devices already in the market. This implies that the 'acceptance criteria' are likely met by demonstrating equivalence to these predicate devices through design, materials, and mechanical testing.
• Mechanical Testing: Performed according to ASTM standard test methods. The results indicate the device "is capable of withstanding in vivo loading without failure." This serves as a primary method of demonstrating performance and meeting a key safety criterion.

In summary, the provided document is a traditional 510(k) submission summary for a physical medical device, not a regulatory submission for an AI/ML-driven device.

Ask a specific question about this device