Search Results

• hard permanent total or partial relinings for restoring partial and complete dentures - lengthening denture margins

Not Found

I am sorry, but the provided text is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a dental relining material (Ufi Gel hard C). It does not contain any information about acceptance criteria or a study proving that a device meets acceptance criteria.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study based on the provided input.

Ask a specific question about this device

Hard permanent total or partial relinings to restore the functions of partial or complete dentures Lengthening of denture margins

Not Found

Unfortunately, the provided document is a 510(k) clearance letter for the Ufi Gel Hard C, a denture relining resin. This type of document does not contain the detailed information required to fulfill your request about acceptance criteria and a study proving a device meets them.

The 510(k) process primarily demonstrates substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than requiring extensive clinical trials with specific performance metrics and rigorous statistical analysis as would be found in a PMA (Pre-Market Approval) application or a more detailed study report.

Therefore, I cannot provide the following information based on the given text:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: This document doesn't specify acceptance criteria for performance metrics or present any performance data in this format.
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: No test set information is present.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: No information on expert review for a test set.
4. Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable as there's no test set described.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, and the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: This is a material (denture resin), not an AI device, so MRMC studies and AI assistance are not relevant.
6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable for a denture resin.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): Not applicable as performance data is not detailed.
8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable as this is not an AI/software device with a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

To get this type of information, you would typically need a much more comprehensive study report, a PMA application, or a detailed scientific publication about a novel medical device, particularly for software or AI-driven diagnostics/therapeutics.

Ask a specific question about this device