Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K191619
    Device Name
    TurboTemp EZ
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2019-09-11

    (85 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3770
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    TurboTemp EZ is a is a self-cure crown-and-bridge composite indicated for the fabrication of long- and short-term provisional restorations including veneers, inlays/onlays, crowns, bridges and long-span bridges. TurboTemp EZ is also indicated for incorporation of most mechanically anchored attachment components into the acrylic base of a denture, an overdenture, or a partial denture.

    Device Description

    TurboTemp EZ is a provisional resin based material intended to be used for the fabrication of crowns, bridges, inlays, onlays, and veneers. The composite material is provided in a dual-barrel cartridge that when combined in the mixing tip, it is dispensed as a self-curing restorative material.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the regulatory clearance of a dental device, "TurboTemp EZ," and includes information relevant to its performance testing and comparison to predicate devices, rather than a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria in terms of algorithm performance for an AI/ML device.

    Based on the content provided, here's an analysis structured according to your request, with the understanding that this is for a physical medical device, not an AI/ML algorithm:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    For a physical dental material, acceptance criteria often relate to physical, chemical, and biological properties, usually benchmarked against industry standards or predicate devices.

    Acceptance Criteria (from predicate/standards)Reported Device Performance (TurboTemp EZ)
    Transverse Strength (Typically >= 100 MPa from predicate/standards)94 MPa
    Water Sorption (Typically <= 20 ug/mm³ from predicate/standards)17.111 ug/mm³
    Compliance to ISO 10477 (Dentistry - Polymer-Based Crown and Veneering Materials)Demonstrated compliance
    Compliance to ISO 4049 (Dentistry - Polymer-Based Restorative Materials)Demonstrated compliance
    Biocompatibility (Compliance to ISO 7405, ISO 10993-1, and FDA guidance for Dental Composite Resin Devices)Demonstrated compliance
    Indications for Use (Match predicate)Same as predicate
    Curing Features (Match predicate)Self-curing (predicate offers self-curing & dual-curing)
    Resin & Fillers (Same type as predicate)Dimethacrylate resin, Silica-based glass fillers
    Mode of Operation (Same as predicate)Dual-barrel cartridge

    Note: While the Transverse Strength of TurboTemp EZ (94 MPa) is slightly lower than the predicate (100 MPa), the FDA deemed it "substantially equivalent." This suggests the overall profile of properties, including compliance with standards, was considered acceptable for the intended use.

    2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    The document does not specify the sample sizes used for the physical and chemical performance tests (e.g., transverse strength, water sorption) or the provenance of the data. It merely states that "Performance testing of TurboTemp EZ has demonstrated compliance" to certain ISO standards and FDA guidance.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    This question is not applicable as the document describes a physical dental material, not an AI/ML device requiring expert ground truth for image or data interpretation. The "ground truth" for this type of device is established through standardized laboratory testing and material characterization.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    Not applicable, as this is not an AI/ML device involving human interpretation or adjudication of outputs.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    Not applicable, as this is not an AI/ML device.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    Not applicable, as this is not an AI/ML device.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

    For this physical device, the "ground truth" is based on:

    • Standardized laboratory measurements: Physical properties like transverse strength and water sorption are measured objectively using established methods defined in ISO standards (e.g., ISO 10477, ISO 4049).
    • Biocompatibility testing: Compliance with ISO 7405 and ISO 10993-1, which involves standardized biological evaluations to ensure safety when in contact with human tissue.
    • Comparison to predicate device: The characteristics of the legally marketed predicate device (Luxatemp Ultra) serve as a benchmark for substantial equivalence.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    Not applicable, as this is not an AI/ML device. The "training set" concept is not relevant here.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    Not applicable, as this is not an AI/ML device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1