Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K153065
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2016-08-01

    (284 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3040
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    The Hammertoe Correction System

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Life Spine HAMMERTOE Correction System is indicated for small bone reconstruction limited to inter-digital repar and fusion of the lesser toes.

    Device Description

    The Hammertoe Correction System is an implant with dual threaded design and is inserted between the proximal and middle phalanges, so the opposing threads fixate on the phalangeal canal of the toe and compress the joint. The implant is fabricated and manufactured from Titanium (Ti 6A1-4V ELI)

    All implants are intended for single use only and should not be reused under any circumstances. Do not use any of the Hammertoe Correction System components with components from any other system or manufacturer. The Hammertoe Correction System components should never be reused under any circumstances.

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but based on the provided text, there is no information about an AI/ML-driven medical device, its acceptance criteria, or a study proving its performance. The document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for a mechanical medical device called "The Hammertoe Correction System."

    The document primarily covers:

    • The FDA's decision to clear the device based on substantial equivalence.
    • The device's trade name, regulation number, regulatory class, and product code.
    • Contact information for the manufacturer.
    • Indications for use of the Hammertoe Correction System.
    • A brief description of the device and its material (Titanium).
    • Mention of performance data (Finite Element Analysis, Custom Shear Testing, and Bench Top Validations) used to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices, but no specifics about the results or how they relate to acceptance criteria are provided.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving an AI/ML device meets them because the provided text describes a traditional orthopedic implant, not an AI/ML device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1